| Environmental Defense Fund ArchiveCollection 232
 Record Group 3: Washington, D.C. Office   Administrative Information Physical DescriptionTotal length: 333 linear ft.
 Physical format: Papers.
 Dates1971-1986
 ProvenanceTransferred by EDF-Washington D.C. sporadically from 1988 to 1991
 Subject HeadingsAldrin/Dieldrin
 Antarctica
 Air Quality Standards
 Chlordane/Heptachlor
 DDT
 Hazardous Waste Sites
 Insecticides
 Marine Mammal Protection Act
 Mirex
 Oil and Gas leases
 Power Plants
 Radioactive Waste Disposal
 Resources Conservation & Recovery Act
 Superfund
 Tris
 Water Quality
 Water Supply
  Scope and Content Note The records of the Washington office of the Environmental Defense Fund document the
                                 activities of the attorneys, scientists and staff committed to environmental protection
                                 issues of the day such as hazardous waste disposal, toxic chemicals, marine mammal
                                 protection, and air/water quality.  The records begin in 1970 upon the office’s inception
                                 and continue through 1992, with the largest concentration of material emerging from
                                 the 1970s. The records are arranged into six sub-groups, sorted by function and/or program focus.
                                 They are: Administrative Files; Toxic Chemicals Program; Water Resources Program;
                                 Wildlife Program; Energy Program; Transportation Program.   The Administrative Files are divided into Counsels, Public Information/Communications,
                                 and Fundraising Files. Each program subgroup is divided into the following sub-subgroups: Legal Files, Project
                                 Files, and Public Statements.  The Legal Files contain records from litigation & hearings
                                 participation; Project files contain records from committee participation and other
                                 activities; Public statements contain comments, testimony and articles written by
                                 program staff. Topics  Below is a general overview of the collection, but not an exhaustive list.  Please
                                 see the sub-group and series descriptions for more information. Air Quality  Litigation/Hearings Clean Air Act: Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality ProvisionsNew Source Performance Standards (NSPS): Sulfur dioxide emissions from steam electric
                                 generating units
 See: Sub-group II.2, Series 1 Dams & Reservoirs Litigation/Hearings Tennessee/Tombigbee WaterwayTocks Island Dam
 Truman Dam
 See: Sub-group III.2 Series 1 Columbia Dam See: Sub-group IV.2, Series 1 Electricity Rate Design & Energy Conservation Litigation/Hearings Implementation of Conservation Programs--New YorkRate Design for Electric Corporations—New York
 Electric Utilities--California
 Electric Utilities--Michigan
 See: Sub-group V.2, Series 1 Hazardous Waste Management Litigation/Hearings Hazardous Waste RegulationsUranium Mill Tailings Disposal
 See: Sub-group II.2 Series 1
 Projects Hazardous Waste Regulations [State]Hazardous Waste Sites [Subject files by state]
 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act—Comments, Testimony
 Superfund Legislation
 Superfund Program—Community Participation
 See:Sub-group II.3, Series 2
 Marine Mammal Protection Litigation/Hearings  Marine mammals in AlaskaTuna/Porpoise: Regulations Governing Taking of Marine Mammals during Fishing Operations
 Walruses
 See: Sub-group IV.2 Series 1
 Pesticides, Insecticides & Herbicides Litigation/Hearings  2,4,5-T Suspension Hearings before the EPAAldrin and Dieldrin Cancellation Hearings before the EPA
 Chlordane & Heptachlor Cancellation Hearings before the EPA
 DDT Cancellation Hearings before the EPA
 Mirex Cancellation Hearings before the EPA
 Rodenticide Cancellation Hearings before the EPA
 See:Sub-group II.2, Series 1
 Toxic Substances Projects Asbestos in Hair DryersCosmetics Safety
 Hair Dyes—Carcinogenicity
 Toxic substances and the Workplace
 See: Sub-group II.3, Series 2 Water Quality & Water Supply Projects Safe Drinking Water—LouisianaWater Supply—Washington, D.C.
 Long Island Water
 See: Sub-group II.3, Series 2  Sub-group and Series Descriptions  Record Group 3: Washington D.C. Office Subgroup and Series Descriptions SG I    Administrative -- the functions dealing with finances, public relations and organizational policies
                                 and procedures Sub-group I.1 Administrative--Counsels Series 1: William A. Butler 1971-1983 [3 ft, 4in]Arrangement: Divided into chronological files, comments, testimony and subject files
 Routine correspondence with colleagues, memoranda on management of the EDF office,
                                 comments on pesticides, and correspondence regarding EDF cases such as the Trans Alaska
                                 Pipeline System, Supersonic Transport, and DDT Series 2: William Y. Brown 1984 [2 inches]Arrangement: Divided into correspondence and memorandaActing Executive Director in
                                 1984
 Sub-group I.2 Administrative—Public Information/Communications Series 1: Correspondence & Memoranda 1974-1976 [10 inches]Arrangement: Divided into 2 groups: Subjects and Charlene Dougherty files
 Memoranda and correspondence on PCBs, the Fairness Doctrine, electric utility rates
                                 and the film Planning for Floods. Series 2: Press Releases 1971-1984 [10 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Press releases on the projects of the Environmental Defense Fund: pending litigation,
                                 the release of films, and the release of position statements Series 3: Inter-Office Bulletins 1972-1973, 1975-1981 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Inter-Office bulletins documented on-going projects and were released on a weekly
                                 basis Series 4: Subject Files 1972-1980 [1 ft, 3 in]Arrangement: Alphabetical
 Sub-group I.3 Administrative—Fundraising  Series 1: Grant Files 1975-1982 [5 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Correspondence regarding grant applications, largely dealing with hazardous waste
                                 and the Tocks Island Dam Series 2: Membership 1972, 1988-1989 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Samples of brochures and mailings created for fundraising efforts SG II   Toxic Chemicals Program -- concentrates on toxic substances and their effects on human health Sub-group II.1 Toxic Chemicals Program—Staff Files Series 1: Khristine Hall 1979-1983 [2 linear ft]Arrangement: Divided into two groups: Chronological files and subject files
 Attorney
 Correspondence, comments, and subject files covering hazardous waste disposal issues:
                                 Superfund, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as well as EDF personnel policy,
                                 and a report of the activities of the Toxic Chemicals Program
 Series 2: David Lennett 1979-1983 [7 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Attorney
 Comments and correspondence on attempts to implement policy and standards for hazardous
                                 waste disposal; included are EDF comments on RCRA activities, FOIA requests, and internal
                                 EDF memoranda
 Series 3: Robert Rauch 1978-1980 [5 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Attorney
 Correspondence and subject files on the regulation of hazardous air pollutants and
                                 carcinogens in consumer products
 Series 4: Joseph Highland 1976-1982 [10 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Chairman of the Toxic Chemicals Program, Scientist
 Routine correspondence and memoranda on the activities of the program, including budgeting,
                                 program reports, program planning and personnel. Other topics touched upon are: asbestos
                                 in schools, the Superfund Program National Contingency Plan and the Toxic Substances
                                 Control Act
 
 Series 5: Leslie Dach 1977-1979 [10 inches]
 Arrangement: Divided into chronological correspondence and subject files
 Scientist
 Correspondence, comments and subject files regarding hazardous waste site cleanup
                                 efforts, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act implementation and Recombinant DNA
                                 research regulation
 Series 6: Marcia Fine Silcox 1978-1981 [1 ft, 8 in]Arrangement: Alphabetical subject files
 Scientist
 Series 7: Ben Drake 1981-1982 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Field Coordinator, Community Relations [Hazardous waste]
 Correspondence on efforts to include community input on hazardous waste site cleanup
 Series 8: Robert Harris 1974-1976, 1979 [10 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Scientist, Associate Director, Toxic Chemicals Program
 Correspondence, memoranda, and reports dealing with wastewater management and water
                                 quality issues
 Sub-group II.2 Toxic Chemicals Program—Legal Files Series 1: Litigation & Hearings files 1970-1983 [137 linear ft]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Pleadings, transcripts of proceedings and correspondence related to pesticide cancellation,
                                 hazardous waste management, air quality standards, asbestos, and toxic effluent standards Series 2: Background Documents 1974, 1977-1979 [3 ft, 3 in]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Research supporting litigation of the following: Toxic Effluent Standards for aldrin
                                 dieldrin et al.; Tris; Asbestos in school buildings; 2,4,5-T cancellation hearings Sub-group II.3 Toxic Chemicals Program—Project Files Series 1: Committees & Meetings 1977-1983 [4 ft, 6in]Arrangement: Chronological
 Papers from meetings of the Committee on Testing Guidelines (for the Toxic Substances
                                 Control Act), and planning documents for the compilation of the Global 2000 Task Force
                                 Report Series 2: Project Files 1973-1984 [63 linear ft]Arrangement: Grouped by project; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial
                                 involvement
 Collections of reports, testimony, correspondence and clippings on the regulation
                                 of toxics in drinking water, recombinant DNA research, solid waste management, and
                                 food additives and other toxic substances Sub-Group II.4: Toxic Chemicals Program—Public Statements/Texts Series 1: Comments 1973-1984 [20 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Comments present EDF’s positions on issues on toxics substances and their effects
                                 on the environment and health Series 2: Testimony/Speeches 1975-1983 [9 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Testimony by EDF scientists and attorneys on toxic substances and their effect on
                                 natural resources, presented before legislative and regulatory committees Series 3: Writings by Program Staff 1971-1984 [1 linear ft]Arrangement: Chronological
 Articles and reports, both draft and published, on carcinogens, pesticides, and hazardous
                                 waste SG III   Water Resources/Wetlands Program -- concentrates on water quality, water supply, coastal zone management Sub-group III.1 Water Resources/Wetlands Program—Staff Files Series 1: Edward Thompson 1976-1979 [30 inches]Arrangement: Divided into correspondence, EDF documents, speeches and subject files
 Attorney
 Memoranda to the Litigation Review Committee and programming issues, Water Resources
                                 Program reports, comments on water resources and wetlands-related issues Series 2: Langdon Warner 1978 [5 inches]Arrangement: Subject files
 Wetlands Monitor
 Collected files on the Delaware River Basin Sub-Group III.2:  Water Resources/Wetlands Program—Legal Files  Series 1: Litigation & Hearings files 1971-1983 [18 linear ft]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Case files and records from administrative proceedings on topics such as: Federal
                                 water projects, development projects, water quality standards Series 2: Background Documents [30 inches]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Subject Files regarding the Blue Plains Sewage Treatment Plant Sub-Group III.3:  Water Resources/Wetlands Program—Project Files  Series 1: Committees & Meetings [Reserved] Series 2: Project Files 1971-1979 [13 linear ft]Arrangement: Grouped by project; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial
                                 involvement
 A collection of reports, clippings, press releases and correspondence pertaining to:
                                 floodplains management; wetlands protection; soil erosion control projects, coastal
                                 zone management; and the Delaware River Basin Comprehensive Study Sub-Group III.4: Water Resources/Wetlands Program—Public Statements/Texts Series 1: Comments 1971-1979 [6 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Written in response to requests on proposed regulations or policy, comments reflect
                                 EDF’s position on issues related to water supply, water use, dredge & fill activities,
                                 floodplain management and water quality standards Series 2: Testimony/Speeches 1973-1979 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Testimony before governmental and regulatory agencies and speeches at conferences;
                                 the most frequent topics are the water policy, water reclamation, and water supply
                                 for energy use Series 3: Writings by Program Staff 1973-1977 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Articles and reports both draft and published, on water resources development projects
                                 and water pollution SG IV Wildlife Program -- concentrates on toxic substances and their effects on human health Sub-group IV.1: Wildlife Program—Staff Files Series 1: Michael Bean 1976-1981, 1984 [1 linear ft]Arrangement: Chronological
 Attorney
 Summaries of program activities, comments and position statements on the Marine Mammal
                                 Protection Act and wildlife regulatons Series 2: William Y. Brown 1982-1984 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Scientist
 Correspondence & memoranda on the implementation of the Endangered Species Act, the
                                 Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act of 1983, wildlife conservation laws,
                                 Antarctic conservation issues Sub-group IV.2 Wildlife Program—Legal Files Series 1: Litigation & Administrative Hearings Files 1974-1982 [21 linear ft]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Pleadings, transcripts, testimony, and correspondence on issues related to the protection
                                 of marine mammals and other wildlife Series 2: Background Documents [2 ft, 7 in]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement.
 Reports, legislation and workshop papers regarding regulations governing the taking
                                 of marine mammals during fishing operations Sub-group IV.3 Wildlife Program-Project Files  Series 1: Committees & Meetings [Reserved] Series 2: Project Files 1984-1992 [8 ft, 7in]Arrangement:  Alphabetical subject files
 Subject files concerning the conservation and protection of resources of the Antarctic Sub-group IV.4 Wildlife Program—Public Statements/Texts Series 1: Comments 1973-1979 [3 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Written in response to requests on proposed regulations or policy, comments reflect
                                 EDF’s views on the Marine Mammal Protection Act and commercial fishing operations Series 2: Testimony 1971-1984 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Testimony by EDF scientists and attorneys on the management of fisheries, the Marine
                                 Mammal Protection Act, the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
                                 Resources, and wetlands protection Series 3: Writings by Program Staff 1981-1985[2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Articles, and reports, both draft and published, on wetlands protection, endangered
                                 species, and conservation SG V   Energy Program—a small program dealing with the impact of transportation and highway projects Sub-group V.1 Energy Program—Staff Files Series 1: Subject Files 1979-1982 [5 inches]Arrangement: Alphabetical
 Collected files on utility rates, power plants, and coal gasification Sub-group V.2 Energy Program—Legal Files Series 1:  Litigation & Administrative Hearings 1970-1986 [26 linear ft]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Correspondence, media, pleadings, testimony from litigation proceedings on the construction
                                 of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System; the construction of power plants; the Prototype
                                 Oil Shale Leasing Program, and utility rate design Series 2: Background Documents [7 ft, 6 in]Arrangement: sorted by case, chronological by date of EDF’s initial involvement.
 Environmental studies regarding the proposed Canadian alternative to the Trans Alaska
                                 Pipeline System; electric company documents regarding the implementation of energy
                                 conservation programs Sub-group V.3 Energy Program—Project Files [Reserved] Sub-group V.4 Energy Program—Public Statements/Texts  Series 1: Comments 1970, 1982 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Written in response to requests on proposed regulations or policy, comments reflect
                                 EDF’s views on the Atomic Energy Commission, oil shale development and the Nine Mile
                                 Point 2 nuclear plant Series 2: Testimony 1974-1981 [2 inches]Arrangement: Chronological
 Testimony by EDF scientists, economists and attorneys electric utility rate design,
                                 synthetic fuels, oil shale leasing and emissions permits Series 3: Writings by Program Staff 1976-1984 [1 inch]Arrangement: Chronological
 Articles and reports, both draft and published, on sulfur emissions, power plants
                                 and energy demand SG VI Transportation Program—a small program dealing with the impact of transportation and highway projects
 Sub-group VI.1 Transportation Program—Staff Files[Reserved]
 Sub-group VI.2 Transportation Program—Legal Files Series 1:  Litigation & Administrative Hearings 1970-1977 [12 ft, 8 in]Arrangement: Grouped by case; chronological arrangement by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Testimony, statements, correspondence and media from litigation proceedings on supersonic
                                 transport, air quality in Washington D.C. and regulations governing freight rates
                                 for recyclable goods Series 2: Background Documents [22 inches]Arrangement: Grouped by case; Arranged chronologically by date of EDF’s initial involvement
 Collected reports, impact statements, correspondence and media on Supersonic Transport/Concorde
                                 jet Sub-group VI.3 Transportation Program—Project Files [Reserved]
 Sub-group VI.4 Transportation Program—Public Statements/Texts  Series 1: Comments 1971, 1975 [2 items] Draft comments on the control of carbon monoxide in the Washington D.C. area, and
                                 an op-ed piece on supersonic transport Sub-group I: Administrative Sub-group I.1 Administrative--Counsels SERIES 1: William A. Butler  Box 1 Chronological files—Correspondence & memoranda-Sent, April-December 1971Chronological files—Correspondence & memoranda-Sent, January-June 1972
 Box 2 Chronological files—Correspondence & memoranda-Sent, July-December 1972Chronological files—Correspondence & memoranda-Sent, January-March 1973
 Box 3 Chronological files—Correspondence & memoranda-Sent, March 1973-1974 Box 4 Chronological files—Correspondence, 1974Chronological files—Memoranda on land use planning, 1975
 Chronological files—Correspondence-Sent, 1975-1978
 Chronological files—Litigation Review Committee,1976
 Chronological files—Memoranda, 1979-1980
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Box 5 Chronological files—Correspondence & memoranda, 1980Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Chronological files—EDF Virginia office proposal for VA Groundwater Quality Program,
                                 1983
 Comments: Butler, W.A. (1970). Comments on the Council of Environmental Quality’s interim guidelines.Letter to Russell E. Train.
 Adamson, L., Lang S., David O. (1973). Comments on the FDA’s banned hazardous substances-Proposed exemption of certain lead-containing paints and other similar
                                    surface-coating
 materials. Letter to the hearing clerk, Food & Drug Administration.
 Butler, W.A. (1973). Comments on proposed regulations governing classification of pesticides into general & restricted uses. Letter to Lowell Miller & William H. Preston, Environmental
 Protection Agency.
 Butler, W.A. (1974). Comments on the proposed environmental review procedure implementing section 104 of Title I of the Housing & Community Development Act of 1974.  Letter to the
 hearing clerk, Environmental Protection Agency.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1975). Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund on RailReorganization of the Northeast & Midwest pursuant to the Regional Rail
                                    Reorganization
 Act.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1976). Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund at FAA hearing on EPA’s proposed noise standard for SSTs. Typescript.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1980). [Comments on draft recommendations on intragovernmental
                                 communications in informal rulemaking proceedings, 45 Fed. Reg. 69848
 (October 17, 1980)]. Letter to Charles R. Pouncey, Administrative Conference
                                 of the United
 States.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund re: Proposed  regulations for implementation of procedural provisions of NEPA, 43 Fed. Reg. 25230
 (June 9, 1978).
 Testimony: March 18, 1977: Richard A. Frank, on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund et al.,
                                 regarding the implications of deep sea mining, before the Subcommittee on Oceanography
                                 of the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries Box 6 1979: Testimony of James N. Barnes before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on
                                 the Environmental Modification Convention. 1980: Testimony of William A. Butler on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund,
                                 regarding S. 739 and S. 1472 to revise federal venue provisions, before the Senate
                                 Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Matters. Reports: Bonn Conference on Environmental Law-Trip report, 1973EDF-Virginia Project Report, July 16-31, 1973
 Subject Files: Air Pollution-Smoke & haze, 1970Asbestos
 Darien Gap Highway-Memoranda, 1974-1975
 Detergent ordinance, Akron Ohio-EDF court memorandum, 1971
 Discount rate—Memoranda, press releases, 1971
 Environmental Protection Agency-Criticism, 1982
 Box 7 Subject files: Featherstone National Wildlife Refuge-Correspondence & impact statement, 1975Forest Service, 1978
 Nuclear power issues-Correspondence & memoranda, 1975-1977
 Nuclear power issues-Clippings,
 Nuclear power issues-Legislation [S.1439, Export Reorganization Act]
 Recycling-Brochures, pamphlets, ca. 1975
 Reimbursement for public participation in proceedings-Memoranda, comments, reports,
                                 1978-1983
 Box 8 Reimbursement for public participation in proceedings-Memoranda, comments, reports,
                                 1978-1983Reorganization of the federal governments functions re: environmental programs, 1978-1979
 Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge-Effects of water skiing on wildlife, 1976
 Starkweather Watershed Project, Devil’s Lake, North Dakota
 Tinsel-Motion for temporary restraining order in “icicles” containing lead, 1970
 SERIES 2: William Y. Brown  Box 1 Correspondence, June 1984Memoranda, January-February, 1984
 Memoranda, April-May, 1984
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Executive Committee meeting agenda & documents, June 1984
 Sub-group I.2 Administrative—Public Information/Communications SERIES 1: Correspondence / Memoranda Box 1 Correspondence-Action on Smoking & Health (newsletter & brochures)Correspondence-Fairness doctrine (with EDF comments)
 Correspondence-PCBs
 Correspondence-Tuna / Porpoise
 Charlene Dougherty Files [Public Information Officer]:Memoranda-Sent & received, 1974-1976
 Memoranda-Planning for Floods brochure, 1974
 Memoranda-EDF staff participation in radio program, 1975
 Memoranda-Public Service advertisements, 1976
 Box 2 Charlene Dougherty Files [Public Information Officer]:Memoranda, 1978
 Chronological files-Electric utility rates, 1974-1976
 Chronological files-National Flood Insurance Program, 1974
 SERIES 2: Press Releases Box 1 Press releases, 1971-1982 Box 2 Press releases, 1982-1984 Press releases-“Our Environment”-Los Angeles Times, February 1975-February 1976 SERIES 3: Inter-Office Bulletins Box 1 Washington Office bulletins, 1972-1973, 1975-1981 SERIES 4: Subject Files Box 1 Air quality-Copies of testimony on auto emissions standards, 1972Architecture-Environmental impact statements, early 1970s
 Beaches [Conservation]-Press releases
 Birds-Press releases, flyers
 Channelization-Hearings, Press releases, early 1970s
 Chromium standards, 1980
 Box 2 Drugs-FDA regulations, 1979Development-Long Island-Press releases, speech, memorandum, early 1970s
 Feed additives-1976 Feed additive compendium
 Fish & mollusks-Press releases
 Box 3 Economic conversion, 1978Environmental Study Conference Weekly Bulletin, May-December 1977
 Epidemiology, geography-Journal articles
 Food additives-Journal articles, 1970s
 Box 4 Food additives-Testimony, proposed legislation, 1970sHazardous Waste Report, Vol. 1, nos. 1-2, 6, 16-17
 Labeling hazardous waste seminar papers, 1980
 Minorities in the environmental movement/toxic waste concerns, 1982
 Smoking and health-Petitions, 1977-1978
 Vinyl chloride-EPA report-Quantitative risk of exposure, 1975
 Sub-group I.3 Administrative Files—Fundraising  SERIES 1: Grant Files Box 1 Correspondence / Memoranda-General, 1975-1980, undatedTocks Island fundraising, 1976
 Toxics Program community work projects, 1982
 Conservation voltage regulation in Washington D.C., 1983
 SERIES 2: Membership Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund. (ca. 1972). Asbestos in hairdryers [brochure].New York: author.
 Solicitation mailings, 1988-1989 Sub-group II Toxic Chemicals Program Sub-group II.1 Toxic Chemicals Program—Staff Files SERIES 1: Khristine Hall  Box 1 Chronological correspondence-Global 2000 Task Force, 1980Chronological correspondence-Sent, 1981
 Chronological correspondence-Air quality, 1981
 Chronological correspondence-Hazardous waste, 1981-1982
 Box 2 Chronological correspondence-Sent [includes files on hazardous waste], 1982-1983 Box 3 Chronological correspondence-Acid rain, 1981Chronological correspondence-Hazardous waste, 1983
 Clean Air Act-Copies of correspondence-Dept of Justice, 1981Dept of Defense regulations-Comments, 1979
 Federal regulation E.O. 12291-Reports
 Box 4 Federal regulations-E.O. 12291Hazardous waste / Superfund-Post closure liability provisions-Hearing statements,
                                 1981
 Hazardous waste laws, international
 Hyde Park Landfill-Court documents, litigation memorandum, 1981
 Box 5 Hyde Park Landfill-Court documents, litigation memorandum, 1981National Science Foundation workshop papers, regulatory costs and technological innovation
 Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980-Government documents
 Water quality standard-Copies of correspondence, report, 1970s
 SERIES 2: David Lennett Box 1 Chronological correspondence-Hazardous waste, 1979-1983EPA—Budget—Reports, 1981-1982
 Box 2 EPA—Budget—Reports, 1981-1982Hazardous waste management-National Wildlife Federation background papers
 SERIES 3: Robert Rauch Box 1 Chronological correspondence, 1978-1980 Subject Files: Air Pollution-ReadingsAir Pollutants-Long range transport-Reports
 Box 2 Air Pollutants-Sulfur Dioxide-ReportsCoal-Clean Air and increased coal use-Hearings, 1979
 Coal-National Coal Policy Project
 Coal-National Coal Utilization Assessment-Handbook, report
 Environmental Forum VI-Program papers, 1978
 Phosphate Rock Plants-Background information: proposed standards-EPA
 SERIES 4: Joseph Highland Box 1 Chronological correspondence, 1976-1981 Box 2 Chronological correspondence, 1981-1982 Subject files:Monsanto Company ad campaign-EDF rebuttal-Memoranda, 1977-1978
 SERIES 5: Leslie Dach Box 1 Chronological correspondence [Resource Conservation & Recovery Act/Superfund], 1977-1979 Subject files:Public education, 1979
 Environment & inflation, 1978
 Grass roots lobbying, 1978
 Hazardous waste legislation-Congressional testimony, July, September-October 1979
 Box 2 Hazardous waste legislation-Congressional testimony, October 1979 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-Memoranda-EPA, 1977-`979 Solid waste report, Volume 9, nos. 21-22, 24-26, 1978Solid waste report, Volume 10, nos. 1-25, 1979
 Superfund legislation-Memoranda & congressional testimony, 1979 SERIES 6: Marcia Fine Silcox Box 1 Subject Files: Action Seminar on Acid Precipitation-Media, 1979Benzidine derived dyes-OSHA report, 1979
 Cancer & the Environment-Reprints, articles, mid-1970s
 Carcinogens-Testing for identification-Reports, 1979
 Interagency Cooperative Action Plan for Regulation of Chemical Substances
 (CPSC, EPA, FDA, OSHA), 1978
 Box 2 Interagency Cooperative Action Plan for Regulation of Chemical Substances(CPSC, EPA, FDA, OSHA), 1978
 Malignant Neglect-Book reviews, advertisements, 1979
 Methyl Chloride-Reprints, Clippings, 1978
 PCBs-Reprints, 1977-1978
 Radiation-Nuclear energy-Articles, 1970s
 Radiation-X-rays-Articles, 1970s
 Box 3 Radiation-X-rays-Brochures, 1970sRisk assessment-Papers-Robert L. Golberg (EDF Intern), 1978
 Silvex-Report-Biologic & Economic Assessment-RPAR Assessment Team, 1981
 Victims’ Compensation-Scientific history-draft report-Environmental Defense Fund,
                                 1981
 Victims’ Compensation-Fact sheets, reports, 1970s
 Box 4 Water filters-Petition of EDF to the FTC to investigate validity of advertising claims,
                                 1978Women in Science-Symposium papers, 1980
 Women-Exposure to toxic substances in the workplace-Clippings, 1970s
 SERIES 7: Ben Drake Chronological files, September-December 1982 SERIES 8: Robert Harris Box 1 Chronological correspondence, 1974 [Drinking water in New Orleans]Petition of EDF to ban Tris-treated wearing apparel, 1977
 Chronological correspondence, 1979 [Potomac Estuary draft report]
 Chronological correspondence, 1979
 Box 2 Federal Water Pollution Control Act-Memoranda, 1975-1976Federal Water Pollution Control Act-Copies of permits to discharge
 Wastewater management-Long Island-Correspondence, 1974-1976 United States. (1974). Water quality management planning for urban runoff. Colston, N. V. (1974). Characterization and treatment of urban land runoff. Environmentalprotection technology series, 1974, 96. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Environmental
 Research Center.
 United States, Hydroscience, inc, & Malcolm Pirnie Engineers, Inc. (1974). Potomac estuary water supply: A prototype water treatment facility. Westwood, N.J.: Hydroscience.
 United States. (1975). Northeastern United States water supply study: Interim report : critical choices for critical years. New York, N.Y.?: The Division?.
 Meta Systems Inc. (1976). Land use - water quality relationship: Prepared under Contract no.68-01-2622 for the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: Environmental
 Protection Agency, Water Planning Division.
 Sub-group II.2 Toxic Chemicals Program—Legal Files SERIES 1: Litigation & Hearings Mirex—Imported Fire Ant Control (1970); 1 box Box 1 EDF et al. v. Hardin No. 2319-70 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Correspondence, 1970-1973Affidavits
 Pleadings:Complaint for injunction and declaratory judgment, August 1970
 Motion to dismiss, 1970-1971
 Amendment to complaint, 1971
 Pre-trial statements, 1972
 Record items
 Petition for Suspension of Economic Poisons Containing 2,4,5-T (1970); 1 box Box 1 Petition for the immediate suspension of registration of economic poisons containing
                                 2,4,5-T…by Harrison Wellford et al. before the Secretary of Agriculture
 Wellford et al. v. Hardin No. 24,434 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.) Petition for review of the order of the Secretary of Agriculture, July 1970Pleadings—Re: spray project in Globe, Arizona, October 1970
 Brief for the petitioners, October 1970
 Reply brief for the petitioners, November 1970
 Brief for amicus curiae National Agricultural Chemicals Association, November 1970
 Brief of respondent Clifford Hardin, December 1970
 Judgment, January 1971
 Comments and evidentiary submission of Harrison Wellford et al. before the Environmental
                                 Protection Agency; On remand from the U.S. Ct. of Appeals 2, 4, 5-T—Status of the Cancellation Proceedings / Final Policy of the Administrator
                                    (1971-1973); 3 boxes
 Box 1 Dow Chemical v. Ruckelshaus No. PB 71 164 (U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. AR, Pine
                                    Buff Div.) Pleadings:Motion for preliminary injunction, December 1971
 Memorandum in support of preliminary injunction, 1971
 Motion to dismiss or summary judgment, 1972
 Memorandum-Dow Chemical
 Exhibits—Dow Chemical Co. (?) Dow Chemical v. Ruckelshaus No. 72-1441 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 8th Cir.) Briefs:Amicus Curiae—Environmental Defense Fund
 Appellant—Ruckelshaus
 Appellee—Dow Chemical
 Appendix Box 2 Dow Chemical Company v. Ruckelshaus No. 72-1441 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 8th Cir.) Appendix: Exhibit, Volume I (Advisory Committee report)Appendix: Exhibit, Volume II (Brief in Wellford v. Hardin)
 Background documents:Documents—Environmental Defence Society (N.Z.)
 Hearings before the Subcommittee on Energy, Natural Resources & the Environment of
                                 the Committee on Commerce, U.S. Senate. Effects of 2,4,5-T on man and the environment,
                                 April & June 1970. Hearings before the Environmental Protection Agency, I.F.R. Nos. 42, 44, 45, 48—pleadings
                                 and brief of Dow Chemical, 1972 Box 3 Dow Chemical v. Ruckelshaus No. 72-1441 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 8th Cir.) Brief—Environmental Protection Agency, September 1972Brief—Environmental Defense Fund as amicus curiae, September 1972
 Reply brief—Environmental Protection Agency, December 1972
 Opinion, 1973
 DDT Cancellation Hearing before the Environmental Protection Agency Hearing Examiner (1971-1972); 40 boxes
 I.F. & R. Nos. 57, 63, 66 et al., before Edmund M. Sweeney Hearing Examiner Box 1 Correspondence, 1971-1972 Pleadings—Pre-hearing:April 1971
 May 1971
 Brief of intervenor Environmental Defense Fund, June 1971
 Brief of petitioners Cotton Producer Association et al. ca. July 1971
 August 1971
 Pleadings:September-December 1971
 Statement on issues, January 1972
 February 1972
 Box 2 Pleadings:On testimony, February 1972
 Summary of law and analysis of the evidence, March 1972
 Rebuttals to summary of law and analysis of evidence, March 1972
 Proposed findings of fact & conclusions of law—Eli Lilly & Co, March 1972
 Proposed findings of fact & conclusions of law—Group petitioners, March 1972
 Brief of the Environmental Defense Fund (incomplete), April 1972
 Box 3 Pleadings:Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law—Intervenor H.P. Cannon & Son
 Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and order—U.S. Department of Agriculture
 Brief—Respondent EPA’s brief in support of findings of fact, conclusions of law
 Intervenor Environmental Defense Fund’s rebuttal statement of law, analysis of evidence
 Exceptions of intervenor Environmental Defense Fund et al. to Hearing Examiner’s recommended
                                 decision & conduct of hearing, May 12, 1972
 Respondent EPA’s brief in response to Judicial Officer’s questions and to briefs in
                                 support of recommended decision, May 15, 1972
 Box 4 Pleadings:Answers of the Environmental Defense Fund to questions asked during oral argument,
                                 May 24, 1972
 USDA’s reply to respondent’s and EDF’s exceptions and briefs to hearing examiner’s
                                 recommended decision, May 26, 1972
 Group petitioners’ brief in opposition to respondent’s exceptions to the Examiner’s
                                 decision and brief
 Opinion of the Administrator, June 14, 1972
 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 1-Marshall M. Laird on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 1-David F. Young on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 2-David F. Young on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 2-C.R. Jordan on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 2-Farrell Higbee on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 3-James R. Brazzel on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 3-Edward F. Knipling on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Box 5 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 4-Norman B. Akesson on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 4-Edward F. Knipling on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture
 Volume 5-Ted A. Loomis on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 6-Virgil Freed on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 7-Harland Fowler on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 7-Edward R. Laws on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 8-Anne R. Yobs on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 9-Ralph E. Neal on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 9-Samuel E. Simmons on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Box 6 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 10-Thomas McIntyre on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 10-Henry F. Nixon on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 10-Dean F. Lovitt on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 10-Robert H. Altman on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 11-Haruo Tashiro on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 11-Edgar A. Taylor on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 11-Jesse L. Steinfeld
 Volume 12-Lorenzo Tomatis on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 12-John Higginson on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 13-Henry P. Cannon on behalf of H.P. Cannon & Son
 Volume 13-Carlton L. Byrd on behalf of H.P. Cannon & Son
 Volume 13-Charles N. Jackson on behalf of H.P. Cannon & Son
 Volume 13-Douglas M. Greenwood on behalf of H.P. Cannon & Son
 Volume 13-Paul P. Burbutis on behalf of H.P. Cannon & Son
 Volume 14-Kenneth Hill on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 14-Opening statement of the Secretary of Agriculture as intervenor
 Volume 14-Thomas Jukes on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture
 Volume 15-Rudolph D. Radeleff on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 15-Kenneth Hill on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Box 7 Transcripts of testimony:—Witnesses on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture:Volume 15-Clarence Hoffmann
 Volume 16-Clarence Hoffmann
 Volume 16-John E. Davies
 Volume 16-Joseph H. Davis
 Volume 17-Donald P. Morgan
 Volume 17-Clifford Roan
 Volume 18-Wayland J. Hayes
 Volume 19-Leo Dale Newsome
 Volume 19-William G. Eden
 Volume 20-Lloyd Hazelton
 Volume 20-R.L. Ridgway
 Volume 20-Dabney S. Wellford
 Box 8 Transcripts of testimony:--Witnesses on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture:Volume 20-Thomas W. Maren
 Volume 20-Fred T. Cooke
 Volume 21-Norman E. Borlaug
 Volume 22-Kenneth L. Davison
 Volume 23-James Capizzi
 Volume 23-Joseph C. Street
 Volume 23-Thomas F. Leigh
 Volume 24-John R. Beck
 Volume 24-William B. Jackson
 Volume 25-Stuart R. Race
 Volume 25-Gary Booth
 Volume 26-George R. Harvey
 Volume 26-Ned D. Bayley
 Transcript of testimony:--Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Volume 27-Jerry Burke
 Volume 27-David L. Stalling
 Volume 27-H. Page Nicolson
 Box 9 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 28-Tony J. Peterle on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 29-Wayland J. Hayes on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 29-John B. Dimond on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 30-Philip C. Kearney on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 30-Charles Dean Gish on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 31-Philip A. Butler on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 31-Robert E. Reinert on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 32-Robert E. Reinert on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 32-Kenneth J. Macek on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 32-Umberto Saffiotti on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 33-Alice Ottobomi on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 34-Don W. Hayne on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 34-Umberto Saffiotti on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 34-Mark M. Luckens on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Box 10 Transcripts of testimony:—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Volume 34-Croswell Henderson
 Volume 35-William H. Stickel
 Volume 36-Robert G. Heath
 Volume 37-Statement of Alan Kirk, Deputy General Counsel
 Volume 38-Jerry C. Longcore
 Volume 38-Richard D. Porter
 Volume 39-Lawrence J. Blus
 Volume 39-James O. Keith
 Volume 40-James O. KeithVolume 40-Thomas J. Cade
 Volume 41-Thomas J. Cade
 Volume 41-Joseph J. Hickey
 Box 11 Transcripts of testimony:—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Volume 41-Joseph J. Hickey
 Volume 42-Joseph J. Hickey
 Volume 43-David B. Peakall
 Volume 44-Robert R.L. Guillard
 Volume 44-Herman O. Sanders
 Volume 45-Ronald Eisler
 Volume 45-Stephen W. Hitchcock
 Volume 46-Blake F. Grant
 Volume 46-John M. Anderson
 Volume 47-Thomas W. Duke
 Volume 47-Clarence M. Tarzell
 Volume 48-George E. Burdick
 Box 12 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 48-George E. Burdick
 Volume 48-Howard E. Johnson on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 49-Stephen G. Herman on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 49-Denzel E. Ferguson on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 50-Joel Bitman on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 50-David Pimentel on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 51-Supplemental testimony of Henry P. Cannon II
 Volume 51-William B. Campbell on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 52-Joseph C. Headley on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 53-Transcript of proceedings—On 12/10/71 Science article
 Volume 54-Transcript of proceedings—On 12/10/71 Science article
 Volume 55-Robert van den Bosch on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 55-Everet J. Dietrick on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 56-Richard Ridgeway on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 56-Charles G. Lincoln on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 57-Robert F. Metcalf on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 58-Marvin A. Schneiderman on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Box 13 Transcripts of testimony:—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund:Volume 59-Marvin S. Legator
 Volume 61-Robert w. Risebrough
 Volume 62-Dennis Lynn Meadows
 Volume 62-Lawrence R. Cory
 Volume 63-Marvin A. Schneiderman
 Volume 63-George M. Woodwell
 Volume 64-Alden Dexter Hinckley
 Volume 65-Samuel S. Epstein
 Volume 66-Alan Steinbach
 Volume 66-Jerry L. Mosser
 Box 14 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 67-James G. Armstrong on behalf of Eli Lilly & Co.
 Volume 67-Billy Joe Cross on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 67-Fredrick W. Plapp on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Volume 68-Virgil Freed on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 69-Waldemar Klassen on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 70-Denzel Ferguson on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Volume 71-Stanford H. Smith on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 72-Transcript of proceedings
 Volume 73-George B. Craig, Jr. on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Volume 74-Kenneth L. Davison on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture
 Volume 74-Bruce C. Switzer on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture
 Volume 75-E.L. Robert Stokstad on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Box 15 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 76-Robert Risebrough on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Volume 76-James R. Brazzel on behalf of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Volume 77-William F. Gusey on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 78-William H. Butler on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 78-Mitchell R. Zavon on behalf of the Group Petitioners
 Volume 79-Oral argument-Group PetitionersVolume 79-Oral argument-Intervenor H.P. Cannon & Son
 Volume 80-Oral argument-U.S. Dept of Agriculture
 Volume 80-Oral argument-Intervenor the Environmental Defense Fund
 Box 16 Transcripts of testimony:Volume 81-Oral argument-Group Petitoners
 Volume 81-Oral argument-U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
 Hearing Examiner’s recommended findings, conclusions, & orders, April 25, 1972 Exhibits:Environmental Defense Fund
 Group Petitioners
 Counsel’s notes on proceedings, August-September, 1971 Box 17 Counsel’s notes on proceedings, October 1971-February 1972 Box 18 Counsel’s notes on proceedings, March 1972 Environmental Defense Fund v. the Environmental Protection Agency/ Ruckelshaus No. 71-1256 (U.S. Ct. of App, D.C.)
 Renew a petition for review of the failure of the Administrator to suspend all uses
                                 of DDT, June 1972
 EDF v. EPA & Ruckelshaus No. 71-1690 (U.S. Ct. of App, D.C.) Petition for review of the decision of the Administrator of June 14, 1972 EDF v. EPA No. 71-1548/1690 (U.S. Ct. of App, D.C.) Petition for review of the Administrator of the EPA
 Brief for petitioners EDF et al., January 1973Reply brief of petitioners EDF et al., April 1973
 Coahoma Chemical Co. v. William Ruckelshaus No. 72-2663 (U.S. Ct. of App, 5th Circuit)Petition for review of the decision of the Administrator of the EPA
 Pleadings:Motions to intervene, July-August 1972
 Requests for a pre-hearing conference, August 1972
 On jurisdiction
 On transfer of proceeding, November-December 1972
 DDT cancellation hearing before the Environmental Protection AgencyI.F. & R. Nos. 57, 63, 66 et al., before Herbert L. Perlman, Hearing Examiner
 Pleadings:Motion to re-open hearing & stay order, September-October 1972
 Pre-hearing conference, September 1972
 Box 19 EDF et al. v. EPA no. 71-1256Petition for review of the order of the Administrator
 Brief of the petitioners, 1971 Box 20 Coahoma v. Ruckelshaus no. DC7273-S (U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist., MS)
 Petition for review of order of Administrator-Pleadings, 1973 Box 21 DDT cancellation hearing before the Environmental Protection AgencyI.F. & R. Nos. 57, 63, 66 et al., before Herbert L. Perlman, Hearing Examiner
 Transcript of proceedings, November 1972, February 1973Respondent’s exhibits
 Box 22 Respondent’s exhibits Box 23 DDT cancellation hearing before the Environmental Protection AgencyI.F. & R. Nos. 57, 63, 66 et al., before Herbert L. Perlman, Hearing Examiner
 Pleadings, November-December 1972Recommended decision, March 1973
 Order of dismissal, April 1973
 Background documents (journal articles):DDT debate
 Pesticides—Effects on aquatic life
 Box 24 EDF et al. v. EPA & Ruckelshaus No. 72-1548 and 72-1690(U.S. Ct. of App, D.C.)
 Petition for review of the June 14th, 1972 decision of the AdministratorPleadings, April 1973
 Appendix in Nos. 72-1548 and 72-1690
 Coahoma Chemical Co. v. Ruckelshaus No. 72-2142 (U.S. Ct. of App., D.C.) Pleadings, 1972-1973 Briefs and reply briefs:Intervenor National Cotton Growers of America
 Petitioner Coahoma Chemical Company
 Petitioner’s brief on the applicability of NEPA to the Administrator’s order
 Box 25 Coahoma Chemical Co. v. Ruckelshaus No. 72-2142, 72-2183 etc. (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)
 Appendix, Vols. 1 & 2 Box 26 Appendix Vols. 2, 5 & 8 Box 27 Appendix, Vols. 3 & 4 Box 28 Appendix, Vol. 6 Box 29 Appendix Vols. 8-11 Box 30 Appendix Vols. 7-9 Box 31 Appendix Vol. 11 & 12 Box 32 Appendix Vol. 12, 14Joint appendix—EDF exhibits
 Box 33 DDT cancellation hearing before the Environmental Protection AgencyI.F. & R. Nos. 57, 63, 66 et al., before Herbert L. Perlman, Hearing Examiner
 Pleadings, October 1972, January 1973Pleadings—briefs, February-March 1973
 Pleadings—respondent EPA’s proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, March 1973
 Pleadings—Memorandum of the Louisiana Sweet Potato Association, March 1973
 Exhibits—Environmental Defense Fund Box 34 Exhibits:Environmental Defense Fund
 Environmental Protection Agency
 Box 35 Exhibits:Louisiana Sweet Potato Association
 Boxes 36-38 Exhibits—Case unknown: Group petitionersEnvironmental Defense Fund
 Respondents
 United States Dept of Agriculture
 Box 39 Background documents (journal articles):Pesticides—Biological effects
 Pesticides—Effects on birds
 Pesticides—Boll weevil control
 Pesticides—Cotton insect control
 Pesticides—Effects on the environment
 Pesticides—Effects on fish
 Box 40 Background documents (journal articles):Pesticides—Effects on fish
 Pesticides—Residues in food
 Pesticides—Resistance of house flies
 Pesticides in water
 Aldrin & Dieldrin-Suspension / Cancellation Hearings before the EPA (1972-1975); 69 boxes
 Box 1 Petition by the Environmental Defense Fund requesting the cancellation of registrations
                                    of economic poisons contain aldrin / dieldrin  Environmental Defense Fund v. Environmental Protection Agency No. 71-1365 (U.S. Ct.
                                    of App.)Petition for review of an order of the Administrator
 
 Pleadings, 19871-1974
 Brief for petitioners, November 1971
 Brief for respondents, November 1971
 Appendix
 Supplemental appendix
 Aldrin & dieldrin registrations
 Statement of Shell Chemical Company on paper by Dr. Charles F. Wurster entitled“Aldrin / Dieldrin Environmental & Human Health Aspects” submitted to the EPA in
 support of the petition of the Environmental Defense Fund on December 3. 1970
 Box 2 Consolidated Administrative Proceedings involving the Cancellation of Registrations
                                    of Aldrin & Dieldrin Docket nos. 145 et al.  Consolidated Administrative Proceedings involving the Suspension of Registrations
                                    of Aldrin & Dieldrin Dockets 145 et al. [August 1974] Official correspondence:1971-1972
 February-March 1973
 September-October 1973
 November 1973
 January 1974
 February 1974
 March 1974
 April 1974
 May 1974
 June 1974
 Box 3 Official Correspondence:July 1974
 August 1974
 December 1974
 1975
 1976
 Internal Correspondence:1970-1971
 March 1972
 January 1973
 April-December 1973
 January-April 1974
 June-December 1974
 Media: Clippings, Media-Press releases-EDF
 Box 4 Decision re: Docket no. 46, King Paint and Supply Co., RegistrantsRegistrations under appeal
 Labels of products cancelled in accelerated decision
 Pleadings—Shell Chemical Co. witnesses
 Pleadings—Pre-trial briefs, May 1973
 Box 5 Brief of evidence presented at Davenport, Orlando, Kansas City, Indianapolis, and Lubvock field hearings, November 1973
 Brief on benefits of aldrin dieldrin on corn, citrus & seed treatment, November 1973
 Brief on evidence presented at field hearings—EDF, November 1973
 List of alternative insecticides
 Pleadings, January-April 1974
 Box 6 Pleadings:Brief II of Environmental Issues—Shell, February 14, 1974
 Essential use list
 June 1974
 July 1974
 August 1974
 Box 7 Brief of Shell Chemical on the human toxicology evidence presented by EDF / EPABrief of EDF / EPA benefits evidence presented at the Washington D.C. cancellation
                                 hearing
 Brief on EDF / EPA human health evidence presented at the Washington D.C. cancellation
                                 hearings
 Draft brief on  USDA & Keynol Paint benefits evidence—EDF
 Brief on benefits of aldrin & dieldrin & benefits evidence presented by EDF—Shell
 Box 8 Pleadings:September 1974
 Draft brief on benefits & economics evidence presented at the Washington D.C. hearings
                                 on the suspension of the production of aldrin & dieldrin—EDF
 Brief—Shell Chemical Company
 Brief of amicus curiae in support of the registrants
 USDA’s objections to the presiding officer’s recommended decision
 Respondent’s findings of fact of the environmental effects of aldrin & dieldrin
 Opinion of the Administrator on the suspension of aldrin & dieldrin
 Shell Chemical Company v. EPA no. 74-3500 / 3505 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals)
 Pleadings, October 1974 Box 9 Pleadings:October 1974
 November 1974
 December 1974
 January-April 1975
 Transcript of proceedings—Davenport IA, August 7, 1973 Box 10 Transcripts of proceedings—Davenport Iowa:August 8, 1973
 August 9, 1973
 August 10, 1973
 Transcript of proceedings—Indianapolis, IN, August 21, 1973 Box 11 Transcripts of proceedings:Indianapolis, IN, August 22, 1973
 Kansas City, MO, August 28, 1973
 Kansas City MO, August 29, 1973
 Kansas City MO, August 29, 1973
 Statements of farmers on behalf of Shell Chemical Co.
 Witnesses on behalf of Florida Citrus Mutual, September 11, 1973
 Box 12 Transcripts of testimony:Witnesses on behalf of Florida Citrus Mutual, September 10, 1973
 Allen G. Selhime on behalf of the USDA, September 11, 1973
 John R. King on behalf of Florida Citrus Mutual, September 11, 1973
 Diana Lyons on behalf of EDF, September 11, 1973
 Robert C. Bullock on behalf of Florida Citrus Mutual, September 11, 1973
 James Lichtenberg, October 18, 1973
 Douglas Seba on behalf of the EPA, October 25, 1973
 Elaine Georgakis Papagiannes on behalf of the EPA, October 25, 1973
 Alfred J. Wilson on behalf of the EPA, October 25, 1973
 Box 13 Transcripts of testimony:Transcripts of proceedings-Orlando, September 12-13, 1973
 Transcripts of proceedings-Lubbock, Texas, September 18-19, 1973
 M.J. Sloan on behalf of Shell Oil Company, October 16, 1973 Box 14 Transcripts of testimony:David Pimental on behalf of Shell Oil Company, October 16, 1973
 James R. Sanborn on behalf of the EPA, October 17, 1973
 Alan Taylor on behalf of the EPA, October 17, 1973
 Robert L. Morris, October 18, 1973
 Jesse Cohen on behalf of the EPA, October 19, 1973
 Lelyn Stadnick, October 19, 1973
 Douglas Seba on behalf of the EPA, October 24, 1973
 Box 15 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Herman Sanders, October 26, 1973
 Ross Bulkley, October 26, 1973
 Danzel Ferguson, October 30, 1973
 Roscoe Randell, October 31, 1973
 Patrick Rodney Parrish, October 31, 1973
 Robert E. Reinert, November 1, 1973
 Paul M. Mehrle, November 2, 1973
 M.J. Sloan on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, November 6, 1973Charles Lane on behalf of the EPA, November 6, 1973
 Box 16 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Carlos Fetterolf on behalf of the EPA, November 7, 1973
 Charles Deane Gish on behalf of the EPA, November 7, 1973
 William L. Reichel on behalf of the EPA, November 8, 1973
 Larry D. Wing on behalf of the EPA, November 13, 1973
 Lawrence Blus on behalf of the EPA, November 13, 1973
 Raymond Linder on behalf of the EPA, November 14, 1973
 James O.Keith on behalf of the EPA, November 15, 1973
 Jeffrey Lincer on behalf of the EPA, November 27, 1973
 Box 17 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:James Kawatski, November 27, 1973
 Gerlad Myrdal, November 28, 1973
 Leigh H. Fredrickson, November 29, 1973
 Robert Metcalf, November 30, 1973
 Anne R. Yobs, December 4, 1973
 Henry Enos, December 5, 1973
 Daryl H. Bomkamp, December 5, 1973
 Box 18 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Daryl H. Bomkamp, December 5, 1973
 Daryl H. Bomkamp, December 9, 1973
 Morris Fisher, December 9, 1973
 Umberto Saffiotti, December 11 & 12, 1973
 Stevenson Moore III on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, December 13, 1973 Box 19 Transcripts of testimony:Melvin Reuber, December 13 & 14, 1973
 Transcript of proceedings, December 18, 1973
 Joseph G. Cummings, December 19, 1973
 Melvin Reuber, January 14, 16 & 17, 1974
 Emmanuel Faber on behalf of the EPA, January 18, 1974
 Box 20 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Emmanuel Faber, January 18, 1974
 Joseph Cummings, January 18, 1974
 Melvin Reuber, 1974
 Walter Heston, 1974
 Fredrick Kutz, January 22, 1974
 Herbert Seidman, January 25, 1974
 M. Adrian Gross, January 28 & 29, 1974
 Herbert Seidman, January 29, 1974
 Thomas Fears, January 30, 1974
 Box 21 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Thomas Fears, January 30, 1974
 Neil Chernoff, January 31, 1974
 Gary Van Gelder, February 1, 1974
 D.J. Echobichon, February 6, 1974
 David Pimentel, February 7 & 8, 1974
 William Purdy on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund, February 14, 1974
 Box 22 Transcripts of testimony:Brock W. DeLappe on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, February 20, 1974
 William Purdy on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, February 28, 1974
 Howard B. Petty on behalf of the EPA, March 6 & 7, 1974
 Frank Turpin on behalf of the EPA, March 7, 1974
 Donald Chant on behalf of the EPA, March 8, 1974
 Box 23 Transcripts of testimony:Robert van den Bosch, March 4, 1974
 Knutson Shell, May 23, 1974
 John W. Harrison, May 24, 1974
 B.H. Kantack, July 1974
 
 Transcript of proceedings—Motion to consider acclerated decision, August 1974
 Box 24 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Ralph Sechreist, March 12, 1974
 John A. Schnittker, March 13, 1974
 Transcript of proceedings, March 14, 1974
 Wesley W. Gregory, March 14, 1974
 James W. Apple, March 14, 1974
 Roy E. Martin, March 19, 1974
 George Georghiou, March 21, 1974
 Sidney B. Meadows on behalf of the USDA, March 26, 1974 Box 25 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the USDA:Joe H. Klupenger, March 26, 1974
 David R. Dugan, March 26, 1974
 William Flemer, March 27, 1974
 Henry F. Nixon, March 27, 1974
 Howard L. Bruer [incomplete]
 Box 26 Transcripts of testimony:Luis Martorell on behalf of the USDA, April 23, 1974
 Thomas McIntyre on behalf of the USDA, April 23, 1974
 Reo E. Duggan on behalf of the USDA, April 25, 1974
 John C. Owens on behalf of the EPA, April 26, 1974
 Paul F. Porter on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, April 30, 1974
 Box 27 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of Shell Chemical Company:Paul E. Porter, May 1, 1974
 Stanley H. Benedict, May 1-3, 1974
 Frank Folckemier, May 7, 1974
 Box 28 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of Shell Chemical Company:R.G. Yapp, May 8, 1974
 Leo F. Sekula, May 8, 1974
 E.H. Fisher, May 9-10, 1974
 D.L. Shankland, May 15, 1974
 John W. Harrison, May 15, 1974
 Box 29 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of Shell Chemical Company:John W. Harrison May 16, 17 & 22, 1974
 W.B. Yapp, May 21, 1974
 W.F. Gusey, May 30, 1974
 Box 30 Transcripts of testimony:W.F. Gusey, May 30-31, 1974
 John Redston on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 4, 1974
 Thomas McIntyre on behalf of the USDA, June 5, 1974
 Donald L. Hughes on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 6, 1974
 Box 31 Transcripts of testimony:Raymond A. Guidi on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 7, 1974
 William F. Gusey on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 10, 1974
 Transcript of proceedings, June 11, 1974
 Jerry B. Graves on behalf of Shell Chemical company, June 12, 1974
 Douglas B. Manigold on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 18, 1974
 John Robinson on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 19, 1974
 Box 32 Transcripts of testimony:John Robinson, June 20 & 21, 1974
 John J. Birdsall, June 23, 1974
 B.I. Sparr on behalf of Shell Chemical Company
 John Robinson on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 26, 1974
 Box 33 Transcripts of testimony:John J. Birdsall on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, June 27, 1974
 B.I. Sparr, July 1-2, 1974
 D.M. Devries, July 9-10, 1974
 Walter G. Appleby, July 10, 1974
 Box 34 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of Shell Chemical Company:Walter G. Appleby, July 10, 1974
 Vernon M. Kirk, July 14, 1974
 Don C. Peters, July 14 & 17, 1974
 Harold Stockdale, July 22, 1974
 Box 35 Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of Shell Chemical Company:Harold Stockdale, July 22, 1974
 Lyle Goleman, July 23, 1974
 Harold Blain, July 24, 1974
 B.H. Kantack, July 25, 1974
 John A. Lofgren, July 30, 1974
 Box 36 Transcripts of testimony:James W. Lindsay on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, July 31, 1974
 Ivan Wikner on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, July 31, 1974
 John T. Wilkin on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, August 6, 1974
 Consolidated Administrative Proceedings involving the Suspension of Registration of
                                    Aldrin & Dieldrin Docket nos. 145 et al.  Transcript of proceedings—Pre-hearing, August 8-9, 13, 1974Testimony Transcript—M. Adrian Gross on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency,
                                 August 14, 1974
 Box 37 Consolidated Administrative Proceedings involving the Suspension of Registration of
                                    Aldrin  & Dieldrin Docket nos. 145 et al.  Transcripts of testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the Shell Chemical Company:Don E. Stevenson, August 14, 1974
 H.G.S. Van Raalte, August 16, 1974
 E. Thorpe, August 16, 1974
 Alan Wright, August 20, 1974
 Paul Newberne, August 22, 1974
 D.H. Hutson, August 22, 1974
 Box 38 Transcripts of testimony:Steven Sternberg on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, August 23, 1974
 Transcript of proceedings, August 28, 1974
 Robert R. Nathan on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, September 4, 1974
 Morris Fisher on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, September 4, 1974
 Box 39 Transcripts of testimony:Don E. Stevenson on behalf of Shell Chemical Company, September 11, 1974
 Arthur C. Upton on behalf of the EPA, September 11, 1974
 Frank Turpin on behalf of the EPA, September 12, 1974
 Transcript of oral argument, September 13, 1974
 Exhibits:EDF #2, 4, 7-10
 EDF#1-25 (Iowa field hearings?)
 EDF #26-28, 30
 Box 40 Exhibits--EDF:#30f, 31-32
 #40-41, 47-49
 #50-57
 #62-69
 #71-74
 Box 41 Exhibits—EPA Box 42 Exhibits-EDFEpstein
 Exhibits-EPA:#22, 37, 41-42
 Box 43 Exhibits—EPA#30-39
 #43-44, 46-47, 49
 #50
 Box 44 Exhibits—EPA Box 45 Exhibits—EPA Box 46 EPA Exhibits #71-72, 74-79, 80, 82-84Florida Citrus Mutual (Orlando hearings)
 Key Laboratories #1
 Missouri Farmers’ Association #1 (Kansas City hearings)
 The National Grange #4 (Kansas City hearings)
 Shell Chemical Company #1-2
 Box 47 Exhibits:EPA #42
 Shell Chemical Company # 132-133, 136-137
 Box 48 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company # 136, 139-141 Box 49 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company # 141, 148 Box 50 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#4-9
 Box 51 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#10-12, 14-16
 Box 52 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#16a-16j,
 #49-80, 85-100 (Lubbock TX field hearing), #111
 Box 53 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#17-19
 #20-29
 #30-35
 Box 54 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#112, 113-116, 117-121
 #122, 124, 126, 128-129
 #130, 132k, 134a, 143
 Box 55 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#141J, 141K, 141L, 148
 Box 56 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#142, 144-147, 149
 Box 57 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#149, 155
 Box 58 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#156-157, 159-163
 Box 59 Exhibits—Shell Chemical Company:#164-165
 Exhibits to the testimony of Glen Moore (no exhibit numbers)
 Statements of farmers at the Kansas City field hearings (no exhibit numbers)
 Box 60 Data—Shell witness Donald A. Spencer’s fish kill dataInterviews with Shell expert witnesses
 Exhibits—United States Department of Agriculture:#2-9, 11-12
 Box 61 Exhibits—United States Department of Agriculture:#12, 30, 34, 38e
 Documents related to the testimony of Reo Duggan Box 62 Interviews re: use of aldrin & dieldrin in Puerto Rico Exhibits—Field hearings:Seattle—USDA
 Davenport Iowa
 Indianapolis--statements
 Orlando—notes & statements
 Box 63 Exhibits—Party unknown:Raymond O. Labrisky
 Daniel W. Speake
 David Winn
 Notes on Davenport IA hearingsNotes on Indianapolis hearings
 Notes on Orlando hearings
 Human Monitoring Survey; Lab Findings of Pesticide Residues, 1972. Data provided by
                                 Mr. Krulwich, attorney for Shell Chemical Box 64 Human Monitoring Survey; Lab Findings of Pesticide Residues, 1972. Data provided by
                                 Mr. Krulwich, attorney for Shell Chemical Data—Statistical Analysis of the Human Monitoring Survey Box 65 Shell Chemical Company v. Environmental Protection Agency & Russell Train No. 74-2113 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals) Petition for review of an order of the Administrator
 Brief for petitioner Shell Chemical Company, December 1974Reply brief of Shell Chemical Company, January 1975
 Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture v. Train (U.S. Ct of Appeals)Petition for review of an order of the Administrator
 Brief for the petitioner, December 1974 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. EPA & Russell Train No. 74-1924Shell v. EPA/Train No. 74-2113/74-2114
 Brief for respondents, 1975Brief for petitioners EDF and National Audubon Society, 1975
 AppendixJoint Appendix Volume 1
 Box 66 Joint appendix Volumes 2-4 Box 67 Joint appendix Volume 5Supplemental appendix
 Background documents: Journal articles by subject:Aldrin Dieldrin—General
 Carcinogenicity
 Effects on Fish and Wildlife
 Box 68 Background documents: Journal Articles by subject:Effects on fish & Wildlife
 Residues in soil and food supply
 Effects on human health
 Box 69 Background documents: Reports by author:EPA
 Aldrin Dieldrin Advisory Committee to the Administrator, EPA
 The Federal Drug Administration’s Advisory Committee to review established tolerance
                                 levels for residues of aldrin & dieldrin on raw agricultural commodities
 Shell Chemical Company
 Joint FAO / WHO meetings, 1972-1973
 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS): Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from SteamElectric Generating Units (1979-1982); 10 boxes
 Box 1 Sierra Club v. Costle No. 79-1565 (U.S. Ct of Appeals, Dist of Columbia)& consolidated cases
 Certified list of the contents of the record, July 1979 Pleadings:Petition for review
 Motion to reconvene proceedings for reconsideration
 Discovery
 Petition to review action of the EPA
 EDF petition to supplement the record
 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund
 Brief-California Air Resources Board
 Box 2 Pleadings:Brief-Sierra Club
 Brief-Petitioners’ Appalachian Power Company et al.
 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund
 Re: Oral argument
 Environmental Defense Fund’s appendix of lodged documents
 Brief-Missouri Association of Municipal Utilities
 Reply brief-Sierra Club
 Brief-National Coal Association
 Box 3 Pleadings:Brief-Missouri Association of Municipal Utilities
 Reply brief-Sierra Club
 Brief-California Air Resources Board
 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund
 Reply Brief-Appalachian Power Company et al.
 Opinion, April 1981
 Box 4 Pleadings-Attorneys’ fees, 1981-1982 Box 5 Joint appendix Outline for oral argument, undated Rulemaking on proposed performance standards for electric utility steam generating
                                    units Petition for reconsideration-Utility Air Regulatory Group, 1979Comments-Utility Air Regulatory Group, 1979
 Summary of comments in NSPS rulemaking, 1979
 Documents-Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG)
 Boxes 6-7 Joint appendix Box 8 Joint appendixMemoranda (copies)-Environmental Protection Agency, 1977
 Box 9 Memoranda (copies)-Environmental Protection Agency, 1978 Box 10 Proposed standards of performance for electric utility steam generating units Federal Register notices Comments:Environmental Defense Fund
 Natural Resources Defense Council
 U.S. Dept of Energy
 Utility Air Regulatory Group
 Reports by author:Brookhaven National Lab
 Environmental Protection Agency-Sulfur dioxide emission control costs
 Environmental Research & Technology, Inc.
 Pennsylvania Power & Light-Steam electric units
 Documents:Appalachian Research & Defense Fund-Sulfur Dioxide in West Virginia
 California Air Resources Board
 Reserve Mining Co. Plant-Taconite Tailings Discharge (1973-1975); 2 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1974-1975Media-Clippings
 United States et al. v. Reserve Mining Co. et al. Civil no. 5-72 Civ 19(District of Minn., 5th Div.)
 Pleadings, 1973-1974 Box 2 Reserve Mining Co. v. United States No. 74-1291(U.S. Ct of Appeals, 8th Cir.)
 Pleadings, 1974 Predator Control / Rodenticides (1973, 1975); 4 boxesSee also: Record Group IV for records pertaining to Compound 1080
 Box 1 Rodenticide Cancellation Hearings before the Environmental Protection AgencyI.F.R. Docket no. 294
 Correspondence, 1973Responses to notice of hearing
 Application to register sodium cyanide for use in M44 device to control predatorsDocket no. 382 before the Environmental Protection Agency (1975)
 Brief—Environmental Defense FundExceptions of the Environmental Defense Fund et al. to decision of the Administrative
                                 Law Judge
 Box 2 Transcripts:Informal hearing on certain rodenticides, September 17, 1973
 Public hearing-human, urban, & field rodenticides, September 25, 1973
 Informal hearing on use of products containing calcium cyanide, strychnine, et al.,
 September 27, 1973
 Application of the Fish and Wildlife Service to register sodium cyanide for use in
                                    the M-44 device for predator control-FIFRA No. 382 before the Environmental Protection
                                    Agency Correspondence, July-August 1975Transcripts of proceedings, August 12-14, 1975
 Box 3 Transcripts of proceedings, August 14-15, 1975Pleadings, August 1973
 Initial decision of the Administrative Law Judge, August 29, 1975
 Decision of the Administrator, September 16, 1975
 Exceptions to decision, September 1975
 Exhibits:Environmental Defense Fund
 Fish & Wildlife Service
 Box 4 Exhibits:Fish & Wildlife Service
 The Humane Society
 State of Montana
 Documents:Transcript of proceedings of the M-44 Workshop, Denver, July 15-16, 1975
 Summaries of State M-44 Programs
 Tom Garrett (Friends of the Earth) testimony and statements
 2,4,5-T—Suspension Hearings before the EPA (1973-1974); 7 boxes Box 1 Hearings before the EPA, FIFRA Docket no. 295 Correspondence:1972-1974
 Prospective witnesses, 1972
 Letters from the public, 1974
 1975-1976
 Media:Clippings, 1970-1974
 Press releases, 1970-1973
 Newsletters / bulletins,
 Magazine / journal articles, 1971-1973
 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund & Harrison Wellford requesting suspension
                                 of all economic poisons containing 2,4,5-T, 1972 Box 2 Hearings before the EPA, FIFRA Docket nos. 295 et al.  Pleadings:Pleadings, September-October 1973
 Pre-hearing conference—Transcript of proceedings, November 1973
 Pre-hearing conference—Memorandum & notes, November 1973
 Pre-hearing memorandum no. 1—Amchem, December 1973
 Pleadings, December 1973-January 1974
 Statement of National Forest Products Association, January 1974
 Pre-hearing reply brief—American Farm Bureau Federation, January 1974
 Pre-hearing brief—Environmental Defense Fund, January 1974
 Pre-trial brief—Respondent, undated
 Statement of position of Association of American Railroads, January 1974
 Pre-hearing brief—USDA, January 1974
 Pre-hearing memorandum no. 2—Dow Chemical, February 1974
 Box 3 Pleadings:Pre-hearing memorandum no. 3, February 1974
 Reply brief—Thompson Hayward Chemical Company, February 1974
 Reply to submissions—Transvaal, Inc., February 1974
 Reply brief—Environmental Defense Fund, Consumers Union, Harrison Wellford, March
                                 1974
 Pre-trial brief—Respondent, March 1974
 Pre-hearing conference—Transcript of proceedings, March 1974
 Brief in support of consolidation and continuance—Respondent, April 1974
 Pre-hearing memorandum no.6—Dow Chemical Company, April 1974
 Briefs responding to order staying hearing, May 1974
 Box 4 Pleadings:Pre-hearing conference—Transcript of proceedings, June 1974
 Response of Dow Chemical to statement of issues, June 1974
 Withdrawal of hearing, June 1974
 Exhibits:Dow Chemical Company
 Environmental Defense Fund
 Box 5 Exhibits:Environmental Protection Agency
 USDA
 Box 6 Exhibits—Kirk T. Kitchin Box 7 Background Documents:2,4,5-T Scientific Workshop
 Herbicide News Update, Nos. 4-7, 1974—Dow Chemical Company
 Mirex-Hearings to Determine whether Registrations should be Cancelled or Amended (1973-1976); 38 boxes
 Public hearings to determine whether or not registrations should be cancelled or amended
                                    before the EPA I.F. & R. No. 293 Box 1 Correspondence, 1973-1976 Pleadings:On issues to be heard in the hearing,
 Order fixing parties
 Pre-conference pleadings, July-August 1973
 Briefs on scope of proceedings, August 1973
 On motion for discovery, September 1973
 On testimony & cross-examination, November 1973
 Box 2 Pleadings, December 1973-October 1974 Box 3 Pleadings, November 1974-August 1975 Box 4 Pleadings, September 1975-August 1976 Box 5 Pleadings—Proposed findings of fact, September 1976Pleadings—On Mississippi Authority’s plan for the phasing out of mirex, October 1976
 Administrator’s decision to accept plan and suspend proceedings, October 1976
 Witness lists—USDA
 Witness lists—Allied Chemical Corporation
 Box 6 Witness lists—Minor parties Transcripts:Pre-hearing conferences, July-September 1973
 Transcripts of testimony:James R. Gibson on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, December 3, 1973
 Renate Kimbrough, December 4, 1973
 Box 7 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Adrian Gross, December 5, 1973
 Neil Chernoff, December 5, 1973
 Fredrick W. Kutz, December 6, 1973
 James Larry Ludke, December 7, 1973
 M.T. Finley, December 7, 1973
 Adrian Gross, January 7, 1974
 James R. Gibson, January 7, 1974
 Box 8 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Transcript of proceedings, January 7, 1974
 Adrian Gross, January 8, 1974
 Nathan Mantel, January 8 and 10, 1974
 Alfred J. Wilson, January 11, 1974
 Marlin Tagatz, January 14, 1974
 Thomas Duke, January 18, 1974
 Box 9 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Paul Kotin, January 15, 1974
 Alfred J. Wilson, January 15, 1974
 James Lowe, January 17, 1974
 Cazlyn Bookhout, February 21, 1974
 Box 10 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:John Diekman, February 21, 1974
 S. Bradleigh Vinson, February 21, 1974
 John Gart, February 25, 1974
 S.D. Hensley, February 26, 1974
 Walter R. Tschinkel, February 28, 1974
 Box 11 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Walter R. Tschinkel, March 1, 1974
 Karl P. Baetcke, March 4, 1974
 Bruce Wiersma, March 5, 1974
 Dudley Peeler, March 8, 1974
 Jeffrey Lincer, March 7, 1974
 Box 12 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Jeffrey Lincer (exhibits only)
 Jerome A. Jackson, March 11, 1974
 E.V. Komarek, March 12, 1974
 Joe Bowden, March 13, 1974
 Box 13 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:William F. Buren, March 14, 1974
 Earl Alley, March 20, 1974
 Alva Harris, March 22, 1974
 Fredrick Plapp, March 25, 1974
 Robert J. Livingston, March 28, 1974
 Box 14 Robert J. Livingston (exhibits)Joe Yelderman, March 18, 1974
 Gerald A. Carlson, April 10, 1974
 Henry Enos, April 11, 1974
 Gene Fuller, April 17, 1974
 Box 15 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Bart Puma, April 18, 1974
 Norbert Page, April 22, 1974
 Administrative Hearing, April 24, 1974
 William Thomas Hollaway, April 26, 1974
 Box 16 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Leo Newsom, April 30, 1974
 Marvin D. Reuber, May 1 and 2, 1974
 William Thomas Hollaway, May 8, 1974
 Walter R. Tschinkel
 Box 17 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:John Thomas Holloway, May 10, 1974
 Melvin D. Reuber, June 3, 1974
 Box 18 Transcripts of testimony:David Woodside on behalf of the State of Hawaii, June 25, 1974
 David Norbriga on behalf of the State of Hawaii, June 26, 1974
 Alexander M. Dollar on behalf of the State of Hawaii, June 26, 1974
 John J. Tolan on behalf of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii, June 27, 1974
 Kanjyo Sakimura on behalf of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii, June 27,
                                 1974
 John W. Hurdison on behalf of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii, June 27,
                                 1974
 Norman E. Blomberg on behalf of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii, June
                                 28, 1974
 Ronald M. Terry on behalf of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii, June 28,
                                 1974
 John W. Beardsley on behalf of the USDA, July 1, 1974
 Fred T. Arnold, August 15, 1974
 Box 19 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Fred T. Arnold, August 15-16, 1974
 Marvin D. Reuber, September 9, 1974
 Box 20 Transcripts of testimony:—On behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency:Marvin D. Reuber, September 11, 1974
 Roy Clark, September 24, 1974
 Nelson Cooley, October 24, 1974
 Jeffrey Lincer, October 24, 1974
 Administrative conference, October 25, 1974
 Box 21 Testimony on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture:B. Michael Glancey
 William A. Banks, October 31, 1974
 Clifford S. Lofgren, November 1, 1974
 Jerry O’Neal, November 4, 1974
 William A. Banks, November 7, 1974
 Box 22 Transcripts of testimony:William A. Banks (exhibits)
 Neil Chernoff on behalf of the EPA, November 7, 1975
 Raymond Nelson on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation, November 18, 1974
 Box 23 Transcripts of testimony:Raymond Nelson (exhibits)
 Rodney Triplett on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation, November 21, 1974
 B. Michael Glancey on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture, November 22, 1974
 Carl M. Scott on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture, December 6, 1974
 George P. Markin on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture, January 7, 1975
 Box 24 Transcript of testimony:George P. Markin on behalf of the U.S. Dept of Agriculture, January 8, 1975
 Richard Carlton on behalf of the Louisiana Dept. of Agriculture, January 10, 1975
 Halwin L. Jones & Ralph E. Brown, January 13, 1975
 Joseph H. Ford on behalf of the U. S. Dept of Agriculture, January 15, 1975
 Robert Williamson on behalf of the U. S. Dept of Agriculture, January 15, 1975
 Box 25 Transcript of testimony:Robert Williamson (exhibits)
 David Ivie on behalf of the Texas Dept. of Agriculture, January 22, 1975
 Louis Senn on behalf of Clemson University, January 22, 1975
 Gus R. Douglas on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation, January 23, 1975
 Rayford Thompson on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation, January 23, 1975
 Marion Ueltschey on behalf of the MS Dept. of Agriculture, January 24, 1975
 John Anthony Bloch on behalf of the AL Dept of Agricuture, February 25, 1975
 David Ivie, February 27, 1975
 Box 26 Transcripts of testimony:Robert Rhoades on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation, March 28, 1975
 Administrative conferences, April-July 1975
 Daniel M. Embody on behalf of the USDA, August 8, 1975
 Kendall James on behalf of the USDA
 Robert Williamson on behalf of the USDA, August 8, 1975
 Charles Lincoln on behalf of the Arkansas State Plant Board, August 18, 1975
 Box 27 Transcripts of testimony:Administrative conference, September 25, 1975
 Witnesses on behalf of the Alabama Conservancy, January 1976
 Written testimony:Witnesses on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation
 Box 28 Written testimony:Witnesses on behalf of Allied Chemical Corporation
 Witnesses on behalf of Clemson University
 Witnesses on behalf of the EPA
 Witnesses on behalf of the Florida Dept. of Agriculture
 Witnesses on behalf of the Fort Bend Fire Ant Committee
 Witnesses on behalf of the Georgia Dept of Agriculture
 Box 29 Written testimony:Witnesses on behalf of the Georgia Dept. of Agriculture
 Witnesses on behalf of the State of Hawaii
 Witnesses on behalf of the Hon. Joseph Hubenak
 Witnesses on behalf of the Louisiana Dept of Agriculture
 Box 30 Written testimony:Witnesses on behalf of the Louisiana Dept of Agriculture
 Witnesses on behalf of the Mississippi Dept of Agriculture
 Box 31 Written testimony:Witnesses on behalf of the Mississippi Authority for the Control of Fire Ants
 Witnesses on behalf of the North Carolina Dept of Agriculture
 Witnesses on behalf of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii
 Witnesses on behalf of the Texas Dept of Agriculture
 Box 32 Written testimony:Witnesses on behalf of the Texas Dept. of Agriculture
 Witnesses on behalf of the Texas Farm Bureau
 Witnesses on behalf of the USDA
 Box 33 Documentary evidence:Allied Chemical Corporation
 Box 34 Documentary evidence:Allied Chemical Corporation
 National Research Council-Report on the hazards of chemical pesticides
 USDA
 Box 35 Documentary evidence:USDA
 Minor parties
 McGill v. EPA No. 76-4353 (U.S. Ct. of App., 5th Cir.)Petition to appeal administrator’s decision
 Pleadings, March-April 1977Briefs of the Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii
 Box 36 Brief for petitionersReply briefs
 Briefs for the respondents
 Box 37 Opinion and order on use of ferriamicide for control of the fire ant, 1979 Proposed settlement and settlement negotiation documents, 1975-1976 Comments—Environmental Defense Fund—Proposed emergency exemption for use of ferriamicide
                                 to control fire ants, 1978-1979 Box 38 Documents—American Cyanamid Company—AC 217,300 to control fire antsReport—Ad Hoc Imported Fire Ant Committee—NCSU Dept of Entomology, 1971
 Data—Photomirex toxicity
 Rodenticides—Hearing to cancel or amend registrations (1973); 2 boxesSee also: Sub-group IV Wildlife Program for Compound 1080
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1971-1973Media
 Notice of hearing & responses, July 1973Pleadings—Pre-hearing briefs, November 1973
 Notice of withdrawal of hearings, December 1973
 Journal articles-Walter E. Howard Box 2 Journal articles-Walter E. Howard Advisory Committee on Pest Control-Report-Predator Control, 1971 California Vertebrate Pest Committee-Proceedings-Fourth Vertebrate Pest Conference,
                                 1970 National Audubon Society-Report-Status of California Condor, 1965 U.S.D.A.-Environmental Impact Statement-Control of Southern Pine Beetle in Southeastern
                                 U.S., 1974 (draft; incomplete) U.S. D.O.I.-Report-Habitat Management Series-Black-Footed Ferret, 1972 Tussock Moth Control—Request for Use of DDT (1974); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence:Environmental Defense Fund & the Environmental Protection Agency, 1974
 Copies of correspondence of the EPA and USDA, 1974
 Letters to the EPA in support of maintaining DDT ban, 1974
 Media—Press releases & clippings, 1974 Public hearing on the USDA’s request for emergency use of DDT before the EPA—proceedings,
                                 Portland Oregon, January 1974
 Public hearing on the USDA’s request for emergency use of DDT before the EPA—proceedings,
                                 Washington D.C., February 1974
 Testimony:Hearings at Walla Walla Washington
 Environmental groups
 Scientific testimony
 Documents:Environmental Protection Agency—Tussock Moth action memorandum
 Environmental Protection Agency—Order on Forest Service request for emergency use
                                 of DDT
 Environmental Protection Agency—Comments on the draft environmental impact statement
                                 on the
 Douglas fir pest management plan
 Box 2 Documents:Papers from Evergreen State College, Olympia Washington
 U.S. Forest Service—Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Douglas Fir Tussock
                                 Moth Pest Management Plan, March 1974 Box 3 U.S. Forest Service—Cooperative Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth Pest Management Plan, Draft
                                 impact statement, April 1973 U.S. Forest Service—Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Douglas Fir Tussock
                                 Moth Pest Management Plan, March 1974 Box 4 U.S. Forest Service—Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Douglas Fir Tussock
                                 Moth Pest Management Plan, March 1974 Toxic Pollutant Effluent Standards for aldrin-dieldrin et al. Federal Water Pollution
                                    Control Act Sec. 307 Docket no. 2 (1974-1975); 3 boxes Box 1 Transcript of proceedings, October 12, 1976Exhibits—Hercules, Inc.
 Box 2 Exhibits—Hercules Inc. Box 3 Exhibits—Hercules Inc.Exhibits—Velsicol
 Toxic Pollutant Effluent Standards for aldrin-dieldrin et al. Federal Water Pollution
                                    Control Act Sec. 307 Docket no. 1 (1974-1975); 9 boxes Box 1 Proposed toxic effluent standards for PCBs, aldrin-dieldrin, benzidine, cadmium, cyanide,
                                 endrin, mercury, toxaphene—Environmental Protection Agency, January 1974 Correspondence / Memoranda, 1974 Comments on proposed standards—Environmental Defense Fund, January 1974 Box 2 Proposed toxic pollutant effluent standards for aldrin dieldrin, et. al.FWPCA Section 307, docket no. 1
 Pleadings, March 1974Pleadings—Briefs, June 1974
 Transcript of pre-hearing conference, January 25, 1974Transcript of testimony—General Electric—James Wright, May 8, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—General Electric—W.B. Papageorge, May 8, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—General Electric—Edward L. Simons, May 8, 1974
 Box 3 Allied Chemical Company—Kelvin H. Ferber affidavitAllied Chemical Company—James E. Cooper affidavit
 American Cyanamid—Charles P. Preising affidavit
 American Cyanamid—William B. Prescott affidavit
 American Iron & Steel Institute—Sebastian Caruso affidavit
 American Iron & Steel Institute—Peter Doudoroff affidavit
 American Iron & Steel Institute—Walter F. Jackson affidavit
 American Iron & Steel Institute—Earle F. Young, Jr. affidavit
 American Mining Congress—George M. Baker affidavit
 American Mining Congress—Max Katz, written testimony
 American Mining Congress—George J. Capestany, written testimony
 American Mining Congress—Walter W. Weid
 American Petroleum Institute—Testimony
 American Smelting & Refining Company—Robert D. Putnam, written testimony
 Anaconda Company—George M. MacArthur, testimony
 E.I. Dupont de Nemours—affidavits
 Electronic Industries Association—Statement
 Box 4 Environmental Protection Agency—Dwight Ballinger affidavitEnvironmental Protection Agency—Steven Broderius documents (not admitted)
 Box 5 Environmental Protection Agency—Thomas W. Duke statementEnvironmental Protection Agency—James M. McKim statement
 Monsanto Chemical Company—W.B. Papageorge affidavit
 Box 6 Monsanto Chemical Company—W.B. Papageorge affidavitNational Coal Association witness testimony
 Olin Corporation—Louis J. Roznoy affidavit
 Republic Steel Corporation—Perry E. Miller affidavit
 Republic Steel Corporation—Glenn A. Johnson affidavit
 Republic Steel Corporation—John E. Kinney statement
 Reynolds Metals Company witness affidavits
 St. Joe Mineral Corporation—D. Broward Craig affidavit
 St. Joe Mineral Corporation—John G. Reilly affidavit
 Scott Paper Company—Paul L. Busch affidavit
 Scott Paper Company—Leonard Goldwater affidavit
 Scott Paper Company—Nicolas J. Lardieri affidavit
 Shell Oil Company—William F. Gusey statement
 Box 7 Kaiser Aluminum-Robert W. Turner affidavitReynolds Metals—Lawrence C. Tropea affidavit
 American Smelting & Refining Co.—TestimonyGeneral Electric Co.-PCBs  standards
 Kennecott Copper Corporation-Testimony & statements
 NJ Zinc Co.—Testimony on cadmium standards
 Exhibits—Hercules Box 8 Shell Oil Company—William F. Gusey documentTexaco—Albert H. Lasoay affidavit
 Velsicol—Witness testimony
 EDF, NRDC et al. v. Train Civil action 2153-73(U.S. District Ct., D.C.)
 ComplaintPleadings
 NRDC, EDF et al. v. Train No. 74-1538(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.)
 
 Brief—Appellants, 1974
 Brief—Appellees, 1974
 Box 9 EDF, NRDC et al. v. Train Civil action 2153-73(U.S. District Ct., D.C.)
 AffidavitsPleadings-Re: Motion to vacate consent decree, 1978
 Pleadings-Re: Motion to vacate settlement agreement, 1979
 Pleadings, 1981
 Chlordane & Heptachlor—Suspension / Cancellation Hearings before the EPA (1975-1978); 33 boxes
 Velsicol Chemical Corporation et al., petitioners, FIFRA Docket no. 336 Box 1 Official correspondence, 1975-1977 Pleadings:Petition by the Environmental Defense Fund for the cancellation of chlordane & heptachlor
 Motions to intervene, March-April 1975
 Respondent EPA’s list of alternatives to chlordane & heptachlor, April 1975
 Briefs--Respondent EPA
 Briefs—Environmental Defense Fund
 Briefs—Velsicol Chemical Corporation
 Respondent EPA’s motion to take notice of certain facts, June 1975
 Velsicol’s motion to submit…relevant questions of scientific fact to a committee of
                                 the National Academy of Sciences, June-July 1975
 Box 2 Pleadings:Progress reports on status of analysis of uses at issue, July 1975
 On motion to refer questions to a committee of the National Academy of Sciences
 Motion to transfer & consolidate, January 1976
 On motions to intervene, February 1976
 Report on 3rd pre-hearing conference, March 1976
 Box 3 Pleadings:On questions to a committee of the National Academy of Sciences, April 1976
 Motion for accelerated decision recommending dismissal of all non-cancer related issues
                                 from notice of intent to cancel registrations, July 1976
 Pleadings, September-December 1976
 Box 4 Pleadings, January-April 1977Pleadings—Notices of withdrawal, May 1977
 Box 5 Pleadings:Presentation on behalf of registrants for consideration by a committee of the National
                                 Academy of Sciences
 Statement of position of the Environmental Defense Fund on questions of chlordane/heptachlor
 USDA’ statement to the NAS panel convened to consider questions by the Admin. Law
                                 Judge
 Supplemental presentation on behalf of the registrants in reply to a position statement
                                 by the respondent assistant administrator
 Box 6 Pleadings, June-October 1977Pleadings—Briefs—Respondent interim benefits brief, n.d.
 Pleadings—Environmental Defense Fund’s supplemental assessment of evidence of the
                                 1977 corn growing season, March 1978
 Box 7 Transcripts of testimony--on behalf of the EPA:William Reichel, June 22, 1976
 Steven C. Schimmel, June 23, 1976
 Walter Whitford, June 24, 1976
 Kyle Barbehann, June 25, 1976
 David G. Nielson, June 30, 1976
 Charles J. Hennym June 30, 1976
 Daniel Lay, July 1, 1976
 Foster Mayer, July 1, 1976
 Kyle Barbehann, July 2, 1976
 Box 8 Transcripts of testimony--on behalf of the EPA:Donna E. Tegelman, July 7, 1976
 George P. Georghiou, July 8, 1976
 Gary L. Ballard, July 9, 1976
 Donna E. Tegelman, July 13, 1976
 Fred T. Arnold. July 20, 2976
 Arnold L. Aspelin, July 22, 1976
 Roscoe Randell, July 23, 1976
 Box 9 Transcripts of testimony:Arnold L. Aspelin, July 27, 1976
 Lonnie H. Williams on behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation, July 30, 1976
 Harry B. Moore, July 30, 1976
 Richard H. Clevenger on behalf of the EPA, August 24, 1976
 Gary W. Settle on behalf of the EPA, August 24, 1976
 Steven Pavich on behalf of the EPA, August 26, 1976
 Edio Delfino on behalf of the USDA, August 26, 1976
 Ronald M. Hawthorne on behalf of the USDA, August 27, 1976
 Box 10 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the USDA:Ronald M. Hawthorne, August 27, 1976
 Curtis D. Lynn, August 27, 1976
 Ibrahim F. Michael, August 27, 1976
 Bill Callison, August 30, 1976
 Frank S. Morishita, August 30, 1976
 Dean Buchinger  (co-sponsored by Velsicol Chemical Corporation), August 30, 1976
 Carl H. Shanks on behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation, September 1, 1976Norris Pennington on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, September 1, 1976
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the State of Hawaii:John J. Tolan, September 9, 1976
 Richard Y.P. John, September 9, 1976
 Robert M. Ota, September 9, 1976
 Kanjyo Sakimura, September 9, 1976
 Anthony Hepton, September 10, 1976
 John Hurdis, September 13, 1976
 Box 11 Transcripts of testimony:John Hurdis, September 13, 1976
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:H. Tashiro, September 28, 1976
 J. Frank McGill, September 29, 1976
 John C. French, October 1, 1976
 Max H. Bass, October 6, 1976
 Box 12 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Philip J. Spear, October 6, 1976
 Charles J. Hromada, October 7, 1976
 Philip J. Spear, October 7, 1976
 George L. Teets, October 13, 1976
 John Beck, October 13, 1976
 Charles Black on behalf of the USDA, October 14, 1976
 Robert D. Arthur, October 15, 1976
 Dean McBride, October 15, 1976
 James A. Deer, October 19, 1976
 Box 13 Transcripts of testimony:Donald C. Cress on behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation, October 19, 1976
 Angus J. Howitt on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, October 19, 1976
 Leo Dale Newsom on behalf of the USDA, October 21, 1976
 Sidney L. Poe on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, October 27, 1976
 Melvin R. Henninger on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, October 27, 1976
 James E. Dewey on behalf of the USDA, October 28, 1976
 George Patrick Markin on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, October 29,
                                 1976
 Box 14 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the USDA:Ivan McDaniel, November 2, 1976
 Arthur Gall, November 2, 1976
 Arie J. Radder (co-sponsored by Velsicol), November 2, 1976
 Alfred Kay, November 2, 1976
 George T. Fisher (co-sponsored by Velsicol), November 3, 1976
 H. Brenton Teillon, November 3, 1976
 George B. McCollom, November 3, 1976
 Arthur H. Mason, November 4, 1976
 Leighton C. Pratt, November 4, 1976
 James S. Bowman (co-sponsored by Velsicol), November 4, 1976
 Ellsworth H. Fisher on behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation, November 24, 1976
 Howard L. Bruer, December 1, 1976
 Box 15 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:F. Raymond Brush, December 2, 1976
 D.B. Howell, December 3, 1976
 F. Raymond Brush, December 9, 1976
 Joseph H. Rabin, February 17, 1977
 George P. Markin, February 23, 1977
 Transcript of proceedings—Meeting on the order dealing w/ existing stocks, February
                                 1977
 Box 16 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Stanley Nemec, March 1, 1977
 John G. Thomas, March 4, 1977
 August Curley, March 15, 1977
 Robert Lee Welch, March 16, 1977
 Peter C. Orloff, March 18, 1977
 Transcript of proceedings, March 24, 1977
 Virgil H. Freed, March 24, 1977
 Box 17 Transcript of proceedings, March 29, 1977Transcript of proceedings, April 5, 1977
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the EPA:Robert Squire, April 5, 1977
 John F. Ferrell, April 7, 1977
 John J. Gart, April 11, 1977
 Roy E. Albert, April 13 & 22, 1977
 Box 18 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Thomas Evans, June 21, 1977
 Roy E. Albert on behalf of the EPA, September 9, 1977
 F. Thomas Turpin, September 30, 1977
 Brian McMahon, October 5, 1977
 H. Leroy Brooks, October 6, 1977
 John F. Lofgren, October 7, 1977
 Transcript of proceedings, October 17, 1977
 Keith Hora on behalf of the State of Iowa, October 17, 1977
 Box 19 Transcripts of testimony:Virgil Bahnsen on behalf of the State of Iowa, October 17, 1977
 Howard Goodhue on behalf of the USDA, October 17, 1977
 Michael Boehjle on behalf of the USDA (incomplete)
 Richard Schneider on behalf of the State of Missouri, October 18 (?), 1977
 Robert Drewes on behalf of the State of Missouri, October 18 (?), 1977
 Mahon Fairchild on behalf of the State of Missouri, October 19, 1977
 John G. Runyan on behalf of the State of Missouri (incomplete)
 Ivan A. Wikner on behalf of the State of Iowa/Velsicol Chemical Corporation
 Box 20 Transcripts of testimony:Harold J. Stockdale on behalf of the State of Iowa, October 21, 1977
 Robert E. Roselle on behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation, October 27, 1977
 Robert Lounsberry on behalf of the State of Iowa, November 1, 1977
 Transcript of proceedings, November 3, 1977
 Exhibits:Administrative Law Judge, C-3 & C-4
 Box 21 Exhibits—EPA:C-1       Reichel
 C-2       Schimmel
 C-3        Whitford
 C-4       Barbehann
 C-5       Nielsen
 C-6       Henry
 C-7/8    Mayer/Lay
 C-9       Tegelman
 C-10     G.P. Georghiou
 Box 22 Exhibits—EPA:C-11     Ballard
 C-13     Arnold
 C-14     Aspelin
 C-29     NCI technical report
 C-30     NCI technical report
 Albert
 Dubin
 Infante & Epstein
 Box 23 EPA Exhibits without numbers:Council for Agricultural Science and Technology report
 Thomas E. Lodge
 Exhibits—State of Hawaii Exhibits—State of Iowa:C-1       Hora
 C-2       Bahnsen
 C-3       Goodhue
 C-4       Boehjle
 C-5       Wikner
 C-6       Stockdale
 C-7       Lounsberry
 Exhibits—State of Missouri:C-1       Tiemeyer
 C-3       Drewes
 Fairchild
 Exhibits—Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii Exhibits—USDA:Bruer
 Callison
 Condo
 Hawthorne
 Lynn
 Morishita
 Delfino
 Box 24 Exhibits—USDA Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:C-19     Bass
 C-20     Spears
 C-21     Hromada
 C-33     Markin
 Box 25 Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:C-47     Turpin
 C-73     Thomas J. Coleman
 C-77     Evans
 C-86     Brooks
 Beck
 Bouthwell
 William H. Butler
 Box 26 Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Brush
 Butler
 Carman
 Cornfield
 Cress
 Davis
 Deer
 Doull
 Fairchild
 Ferris
 Box 27 Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Fisher
 Freed
 Howell
 Howitt
 Libby
 McBride
 Moore
 Muka
 Nathan
 Box 28 Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Nathan
 Nemec
 Orloff
 Ortman
 Poe
 Rabin
 Reitz
 Box 29 Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Rings
 Roselle
 Shank
 Shindell
 Thomas
 Box 30 Exhibits—Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Thomas
 Vesselinovitch
 Wilkin
 Williams
 Exhibits—Vermont field hearings Box 31 Document production-Velsicol Chemical Co. [confidential]Document production-Chevron
 Box 32 Settlement Box 33 Background documents:Journal articles
 Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Criteria & Evaluation
                                 Division.(1976). Draft environmental impact statement concerning notice of intent to cancel
 registered uses of products containing chlordane & heptachlor.  Washington D.C.: Author.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Criteria & Evaluation
                                 Division. (1975). EPA actions to cancel uses of chlordane & heptachlor as pesticides: Economic and
 social implications. Washington D.C.: Author.
 Hinz, R.K. (1971). F.R. Chlordane & heptachlor notice. Submission of views with respect touses to the Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
                                    D.C.
 Chlordane & Heptachlor Suspension Hearing (1975); 24 boxes Velsicol Chemical Corporation et al., petitioners, FIFRA Docket no. 384 Box 1 Official correspondence, 1976Media—Press campaign, 1975
 Media—Press releases (EDF), 1976
 EPA’s notice of intent to suspend and findings of the imminent hazards posed by registrations
                                 of pesticides containing chlordane & heptachlor, August 1975 Pleadings, August-December 1975Pleadings—Objections and supplemental brief on the recommended decision-EDF, December
                                 1975
 Pleadings—Exceptions to the recommended decision—EPA, December 1975
 Box 2 Recommended decision, December 1975 Pleadings—Briefs:Athena Corporation
 State of Hawaii and the Pineapple Growers Association
 Final brief of the EPA
 Environmental Defense Fund brief on proposed suspension
 National Pest Control Association
 USDA
 Brief of Velsicol Chemical Corporation in support of affirmance of ALJ’s
 recommended dismissal of notice of dismissal
 Box 3 Brief-Benefits of chlordane/heptachlor registrations-Velsicol, 1976 Box 4 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the EPA:Samuel Epstein, August 26, 1975
 Morris A. Fisher, August 29, 1975
 M. Adrian Gross, August 29, 1975
 Ann E. Carey, September 3, 1975
 Joseph G. Cummings, September 3, 1975
 Box 5 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the EPA:Thomas Oren Munson, September 4, 1975
 Fredrick W. Kutz, September 5, 1975
 Henry F. Enos, September 5, 1975
 Alan Taylor, September 10, 1075
 Han Tai, September 11, 1975
 Alan Taylor, September 11, 1975
 James R. Sanborn, September 11 & 12, 1975
 Box 6 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the EPA:Douglas Seba, September 16, 175
 Arnold L. Aspelin, September 18-19, 1975
 Donald Chant, September 20, 1975
 Reo E. Duggan, September 23, 1975
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Kenneth J. Macek, September 24, 1975
 Box 7 Reo E. Duggan, September 25, 1975Robert Fink, September 26, 1975
 Herman Feltz, September 26, 1975
 Frank P. Cleveland, October 2, 1975
 Wayland J. Hayes, October 2, 1975
 John H. Rust, October 7, 1975
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Robert G. Geil, October 8, 1975
 Klaus Stemmer, October 14, 1975
 Philip J. Spear on behalf of the National Pest Control Association, October 15, 1975
 Robert F. Brooks, October 15, 1975
 Box 8 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Robert C. Bullock, October 16, 1975
 Richard L. Lipsey, October 16, 1975
 Hardin B. Jones, October 17, 1975
 Frank William Carlborg, October 17, 1975
 Hardin B. Jones, October 18, 1975
 James E. Dewey, October 21, 1975
 George B. McCollom, October 21, 1975
 James L. Brann, Jr., October 22, 1975
 Richard L. Miller, October 22, 1975
 Box 9 H. Tashiro, October 22, 1975D.E. Howell, October 23, 1975
 Harry R. Gross, October 23, 1975
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the USDA:Ralph G. Nash (co-sponsored with the EPA), October 24, 1975
 William Flemmer, October 24, 1975
 Dean R. Lovitt, October 24, 1975
 Richard L. Cowden, October 24, 1975
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Roy J. Ledbetter, October 29, 1975
 Herbert Womack, October 29, 1975
 J.L. Lancaster, Jr., October 29, 1975
 Charles Lincoln, October 30, 1975
 Glenn Moore, October 31, 1975
 Box 10 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Glenn Moore, October 31, 1975
 Gerald J. Musick, November 7, 1975
 Sidney Schindell, November 7, 1975
 Reo Duggan on behalf of the EPA, November 11, 1975
 John H. Rust, November 11, 1975
 Y.H. Attalah, November 11, 1975
 Joseph H. Thortensen, November 12, 1975
 C.W. Marshall on behalf of Dettlebach, November 12, 1975
 R.W. Schery on behalf of PBI-Gordon, November 12, 1975
 Samuel H. Sandifier, November 12, 1975
 Witnesses on behalf of Athena Chemical Corporation, November 12, 1975
 Robert R. Ruppel on behalf of the USDA, November 14, 1975
 Peter Stent, November 14, 1975
 Box 11 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of Velsicol Chemical Corporation:Kenneth L. Knight, November 5, 1975
 Norman E. Blomberg, November 5, 1975
 Mahlon L. Fairchild, November 6, 1975
 Rodney F. Triplett, November 6, 1975
 Box 12 Transcripts of testimony: Peter Stent on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, November 14, 1975
 Transcripts of testimony—On behalf of the EPA:Nathan Mantel, November 24, 1975
 Walter F. Heston, November 24, 1975
 Marvin F. Schneiderman, November 25, 1975
 David L. Stalling, November 25, 1975
 Stanley H. Margrove, November 25, 1975
 Fred T. Arnold. November 26, 1975
 Box 13 Transcripts of testimony:Samuel Epstein on behalf of the EPA, November 28, 1875
 Oral argument, December 1975
 Fred T. Arnold, December 1975
 Box 14 Exhibits:Administrative Law Judge
 Athena Corporation
 EPA #2-14
 Box 15 Exhibits—EPA #16-26 Box 16 Exhibits—EPA #28, unlabeledUSDA
 Box 17 Exhibits—Velsicol #5-41 Box 18 Exhibits—Velsicol witnesses A-L Box 19 Exhibits—Velsicol witnesses M-S Box 20 EDF v. Environmental Protection Agency / Train No. 75-2259 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals)
 Decision of the Administrator, December 1975Pleadings—Motions to dismiss, February 1976
 Pleadings, February-March 1976
 Box 21 EDF v. Environmental Protection Agency / Russell E. Train No. 75-2259Butz v. Train No. 76-1181 (U.S. Ct of Appeals)
 Petition for review of order of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Petition for review of the order denying the suspension of registrations of chordane/heptachlor Pleadings:Motions to dismiss
 Motions to transfer
 Motion for stay pending review
 EDF Appendix, Vols, 1&2 Reply brief—EDFReply brief—Velsicol Chemical Corporation
 Box 22 EDF v. Environmental Protection Agency / Russell E. Train No. 75-2259Butz v. Train No. 76-1181 (U.S. Ct of Appeals)
 Petition for review of order of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Briefs:Petitioner EDF
 Petitioner Earl L. Butz
 Reply brief—EDF
 Reply brief—Velsicol Chemical Corporation
 Briefs for respondent
 Pleadings, April-November 1976
 Box 23 EDF v. Environmental Protection Agency / Russell E. Train No. 75-2259Butz v. Train No. 76-1181 (U.S. Ct of Appeals)
 Petition for review of order of the Environmental Protection Agency
 Brief-Pineapple Growers Association of Hawaii et al.Brief-Velsicol Chemical Corporation
 EDF Appendix
 Joint appendix
 Box 24 Joint appendix Tobacco Budworm Control—Request for use of DDT (1975); 2 boxes Application for Emergency Exemption to use DDT to control tobacco budworm on cottonApplication by the State of Louisiana; Hearings before the Environmental Protection
                                    Agency
 Box 1 Petition of the State of Louisiana, January 1975 Transcript of proceedings:February 27, 1975
 February 28, 1975
 March 3, 1975
 Comments on application, March 3-4, 1975
 March 4, 1975
 Box 2 Transcript of proceedings:March 4, 1975
 March 5, 1975
 Exhibits Order and determination of the Administrator that reconsideration of prior orderis not warranted, March 1975
 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance (1975); 1 box Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund v. Mathews et al. No. 75-1811 (U.S. District Ct.. D.C.) Complaint for regulatory judgment, injunctive relief and mandamus, October 1975 Pleadings, 1975-1976 Toxaphene & Endrin-Effluent Standards (1976); 9 boxes EPA’s proposed effluent standards for aldrin/dieldrin, DDT, endrin and toxaphene;Hearing before the Environmental Protection Agency
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1976 Pleadings, July-October 1976 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s notice of rebuttable presumption
                                 against re-registration and continued registration of pesticide products containing
                                 endrin, November 1976
 Box 2 Pleadings, November 1976:Proposed findings of fact, proposed modifications—Hercules, Inc.
 Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law—Environmental Protection Agency
 Brief of the Natural Resources Defense Council
 Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law—Velsicol Chemical Company
 Reply brief—Hercules, Inc.
 Reply brief—Velsicol Chemical Company
 Reply brief—Environmental Protection Agency
 Transcript of testimony-Donald Mount on behalf of the EPATranscript of testimony-Leonard J. Guarraia on behalf of the EPA
 Box 3 Transcripts of testimony:Leonard J. Guarraia on behalf of the EPA (cont.)
 Foster L. Mayer on behalf of the EPA
 Steven C. Schimmel on behalf of the EPA
 Alfred F. Meiners on behalf of the EPA
 Joseph L. Rizzo on behalf of the EPA
 Box 4 Transcripts of testimony:Joseph L. Rizzo
 Keith Sweeney on behalf of the EPA
 William A. Brungs on behalf of the EPA
 Leonard J. Guarraia on behalf of the EPA
 David J. Hansen on behalf of the EPA
 Transcript of proceedings, September 13, 1976
 Billy Joe Copeland on behalf of Hercules Inc.
 Transcript of proceedings, September 13, 1976
 Charles L. Dunn on behalf of Hercules Inc.
 Box 5 Transcripts of testimony:Kenneth J. Macek on behalf of the Velsicol Chemical Corporation
 Melvin D. Reuber on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Robert J. Reimold on behalf of Hercules Inc
 Exhibits:Environmental Defense Fund
 EPA exhibits #1-2
 Box 6 Exhibits:EPA #3-4, 8-9, 24
 Box 7 Exhibits:EPA #24-25, 27, 29
 EPA #32-33, 35-26
 EPA-Lichtenberg testimony
 Box 8 Exhibits:EPA-Schimmel testimony
 EPA-Stalling testimony
 EPA-Sweeney testimony
 Hercules Inc.-Reimold testimony
 Hercules Inc.-Bennett testimony
 Velsicol Chemical Company #4
 Box 9 Exhibits:Velsicol Chemical Company-Macek testimony
 Velsicol #7, 9, 11
 Clean Air Act: Emissions Standards for Vinyl Chloride (1976-1978); 1 box Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund v. Train No. 76-2045 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)Petition for review of the National Emission Standard for Vinyl Chloride
 Pleadings:Motions for leave to intervene, November 1976-January 1977
 Re: Motion for interim stay pending review, January 1977
 Re: Joint motion of EDF and EPA for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, March 1977
 Re: Motion to re-open proceedings, 1978
 Reports: Environmental Protection Agency. (1975). Scientific and technical assessment report on vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride. Scientific and technical assessment reports (STAR).
 Washington: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
                                 Agency.
 Environmental Protection Agency. (1981). Flexible vinyl coating and printing operations:Background information for proposed standards. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation, Office of Air
                                 Quality
 Planning and Standards.
 U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, T. a. F. (1973). Final environmental impact statement: Polyvinyl chloride liquor bottles. Washington: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
 TRIS: Proposed Ban on Sales of Treated Apparel (1977-1978); 4 boxes Box 1 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund et al. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. section 2059
                                 to the Consumer Product Safety Commission to commence a proceeding for the issuance
                                 of a consumer product safety rule, March 1976 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund to the Consumer Product Safety Commission
                                 to ban the sale of TRIS-treated wearing apparel, February 1977 Petition of the independent cutters & sewers of children’s sleepwear to the Consumer
                                 Products Safety Commission for reconsideration of the form of the April 8, 1977 ban
                                 on sales of children’s sleepwear containing TRIS Environmental Defense Fund & Robert H. Harris v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCivil action no. 77-0517
 Memorandum—Case approval memorandum for suit against the CPSC, March 1977Complaint for declaratory, injunctive and mandatory relief, March 1977
 Pleadings, June-July 1977
 American Apparel Manufacturers’ Association v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCivil action no. 77-682 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.)
 Complaint for declaratory judgment & injunctive relief, April 1977 Pleadings--Motions to intervene, April-May 1977Pleadings--Re: Plaintiff’s motion for restraining order & preliminary injunction,
                                 April 1977
 American Apparel Manufacturers’ Association v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
                                    No. 77-1407 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.)
 Pleadings:Appellees motion for reconsideration, May 1977
 Re: Appellant’s motion for stay pending appeal, May 1977
 Box 2 American Apparel Manufacturers’ Association v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
                                    No. 77-1407 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.)
 Pleadings—May-June 1977Pleadings—Motion of the Consumer Product Safety Commission for clarification of order
 Springs Mills v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Civil action no. 77-891(U.S. Dist. Ct., S.C., Rock Hill Div.)
 Pleadings:Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, May 1977
 Hearing on motions, May 1977
 Motion for limited intervention—EDF, May 1977
 Re: Plaintiff’s request for admissions & exhibits, June 1977
 Brief of defendant, June 1977
 Findings of fact, conclusions of law & order, June 1977
 Re: EDF’s motion for stay of judgment pending appeal, June 1977
 Order of final judgment & motion for clarification, August-October 1977
 Discovery, March 1978
 Defendant’s motion for a protective order, April 1978
 Box 3 Springs Mills v. Consumer Product Safety Commission et al. No. 77-8209/8219(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 4th Cir.)
 Index to record on appeal Pleadings:Re: Motions for stay pending appeal, July 1977
 Re: EDF’s motion for leave to supplement record, July-October 1977
 Springs Mills v. Consumer Product Safety Commission No. 77-1969Springs Mills v. EDF No. 77-1970 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 4th Cir.)
 Pleadings:Pleadings, August-September 1977
 Brief of amicus curiae American Yarn Spinners Association, October 1977
 Brief of Consumer Product Safety Commission, October 1977
 Brief of appellant EDF, September 1977
 Brief of Springs Mills, October 1977
 Brief of the American Yarn Spinners Association, December 1977
 Brief of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, December 1977
 Brief of appellant EDF, December 1977
 Box 4 Springs Mills v. Consumer Product Safety Commission No. 77-1969Springs Mills v. EDF No. 77-1970 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 4th Cir.)
 Brief of Springs Mills, December 1977Pleadings—Re: CPSC’s motion to dismiss as moot, December 1977-January 1978
 Order of final judgment, January 1978
 Pleadings—Re: motion to dismiss, September 1978
 AppendixJoint appendix & exhibits
 Clean Air Act: Policy Governing Regulation & Classification of Carcinogenic Air Pollutants (1977-1979); 2 boxes
 Box 1 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund for the initiation of rulemaking proceedings
                                 to establish a policy governing regulations and classification of carcinogenic air
                                 pollutants, November 1977 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund-Summary-EPA, 1977 Testimony-Environmental Defense Fund-On recommendations useful in developing a comprehensive
                                 program for the regulation of carcinogenic air pollutants, March 1978 Policy and procedures for the identifying, assessing & regulating substances posing
                                 a risk of cancer in ambient air-Environmental Protection Agency, 1978 Comments-Environmental Defense Fund-On EPA draft policy-Procedures for identifying,
                                 assessing, & regulating substances posing a risk for cancer in ambient air, February
                                 1979 Clean Air Act-LegislationClean Air Act-Media
 Clean Air Act-Correspondence
 Clean Air Act-Amendments
 Clean Air Act-Amendments-Testimony on behalf of the American Lung Association
 Mahoney, J. et al. (1977). Technical evaluation of the non-deterioration portions of proposedClean Air Act amendments. Concord, MA: Environmental Research & Technology, Inc.
 Fuller, B. (1976). Preliminary scoring of selected organic air pollutants. Appendix I. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and
                                 Waste Management,
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
 Box 2 Fuller, B. (1976). Preliminary scoring of selected organic air pollutants. Appendices II-IV.. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and
                                 Waste Management,
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
 Asbestos in Schools (1977-1978); 2 boxes Box 1 Petition for immediate action under Section 303 of the Clean Air Act to abate asbestos
                                 pollution in Montgomery County, Maryland, 1977 Petition to the Environmental Protection Agency to control asbestos emissions from
                                 spray-onmaterials which have been applied in public school buildings for insulation, fireproofing,
                                 decorative or other purposes, 1978
 Response to the petition of the Environmental Defense Fund to control asbestos emissions
                                 from spray-on materials which have been applied in public schools Box 2 Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle et al. Civil action no. 79-1360 (U.S. Dist Ct.,
                                    D.C.) Complaint for injunctive relief under the Toxic Substances Control ActPleadings re: Motion to dismiss
 Stipulation of facts & voluntary dismissal
 Clean Air Act Amendments-Prevention of Significant DeteriorationProvisions (1978-1980); 9 boxes
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle No. 78-0281 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Box 1 Pleadings: Intervenor’s motion to dismiss, February 1978
 Motion for temporary restraining order, February 1978
 Motions to intervene, February-March 1978
 Motions to dismiss, March 1978
 Re: Motion for preliminary injunction, March 1978
 Findings of fact for the intervening defendants, March 1978
 Box 2 Pleadings:Motions to intervene, February-March 1978
 Motion for stay pending appeal, March 1978
 Findings of fact-Texas Industries / Motion for preliminary injunction, March 1978
 Motions to intervene, March 1978
 Box 3 Citizens to Save Spencer County v. Environmental Protection Agency No. 78-1002(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.) & consolidated cases
 Pleadings:Petition to review rule of the EPA, January 1978
 Motion of the Environmental Defense Fund for injunction pending appeal, March 1978
 Motions to intervene, March 1978
 Motions to consolidate, March 1978
 Motion for stay pending appeal, March 1978
 Consolidation of cases, April 1978
 Brief of petitioners Citizens to Save Spencer County, June 1978
 Box 4 Pleadings:Re: Consolidation, June-July 1978
 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund et al., August 1978
 Brief-Petitioners, August 1978
 Re: Consolidation, August 1978
 Supplemental record, August 1978
 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund, August 1978
 Brief-Petitioner Northern Cheyenne Tribe, August 1978
 Brief-Petitioners
 Box 5 Pleadings:Brief for intervenor / respondents & industry amici curiae, September 1978
 Consolidated certificates of counsel, September 1978
 Brief of intervenors in opposition to petitions, September 1978
 Reply brief for petitioners, September 1978
 Box 6 Pleadings:Reply brief of petitioners, October 1978
 Brief-Northern Cheyenne Tribe, October 1978
 Brief-Sierra Club / Environmental Defense Fund, March 1979
 Attorneys’ fees, April-July 1979
 Box 7 Pleadings:Attorneys’ fees, July-September 1979
 Box 8 Pleadings-Brief of respondents, undatedBrief of intervenor respondents Environmental Defense Fund, undated
 Supplemental appendix, Vols. 1 & 2 Box 9 Appendices Resource Conservation & Recovery Act-Litigation (1978-1981); 4 boxes Box 1 Federal hazardous waste case summaries-EPA Hazardous Waste Task Force, 1980RCRA briefing papers-Environmental Defense Fund, 1980-1981
 EDF v. Steffan Plehn No. 78-1715 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Correspondence, 1978Complaint, September 1978
 Pleadings, October 1978-1981
 United Technologies Corporation v. Thomas No. 85-- & consolidated cases Case approval request, September 1985 Box 2 United Technologies Corporation v. Thomas No. 85-1654 & consolidated cases Pleadings:Statement of the issues, January 1986
 Appendices-Environmental Defense Fund / Natural Resource Defense Council
 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund / Natural Resources Defense Council, June 1986
 EDF v. Thomas No. 85-1747 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.)Regulations on underground tanks containing hazardous wastes
 Pleadings:Re: Motion for summary judgment, July 1985
 Discovery, July-September 1985
 Box 3 EDF v. Thomas No. 85-1747 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.)Regulations on underground tanks containing hazardous wastes
 Pleadings:Re: Plaintiffs’ motion to file amended complaint, October 1985
 Discovery, October-November 1985
 Re: Motion for summary judgment, December 1985
 Box 4 Pleadings—Memorandum of Edison Electric Institute, December 1985Appendices—Environmental Defense Fund/Natural Resources Defense Council
 PCBs: Informal Hearings on Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce & Use Bans, before the Environmental Protection Agency (1978); 1 box
 Transcript of proceedings, August 1978 PCBs in Fish & Shellfish: FDA’s Order Reducing Tolerances in Fish (1979-1982); 4 boxes Box 1 Hearings before the Food and Drug Administration No. 77N-0080 Pleadings:Request for a public hearing by the National Fisheries Institute, 1979
 1980-1981
 Submission of testimony of the National Marine Fisheries Service, 1981
 Notice of withdrawal of the Environmental Defense Fund, October 1981
 Brief—Bureau of Foods, January 1982
 Initial decision, February 1982
 Post hearing brief—Environmental Defense Fund & National Marine Fisheries Service
 Exceptions to initial decision, April 1982
 Reply Brief—Environmental Defense Fund, May 1982
 Reply brief—National Fisheries Institute, May 1982
 Decision of the Commissioner, 1984Index to exhibits—G11-G19; G37M-G37LL
 Box 2 Exhibits:G10—G19
 Box 3 G20-G29G37
 Box 4 Exhibits:G37S—G37Y
 G37AA, G37CC-G37LL
 PCBs:  Regulations pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act section e  (1979)3 boxes
 Box 1 EDF v. the Environmental Protection Agency No. 79-1580 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.
                                    Cir.)Petition for Review
 Pleadings:July 1979
 Order of consolidation & index to the record, August 1979
 Brief—Respondent
 Brief—Intervenor Aluminum Company of America
 Reply Brief--Petitioners
 Opinion & joint motion for clarification, November 1980
 Joint petition for issuance of the mandate, December 1980
 Motions for leave to intervene, December 1980-January 1981
 Status report of the EPA et al. re: activities required by orders
 Box 2 Pleadings-Brief of petitioner EDF, 1979Certified index
 Box 3 Re: Attorneys’ fees, August 1981Pleadings & orders, 1982-1983
 2,4,5-T: Emergency Suspension Orders for 2,4,5-T & Silvex (1979); 2 boxes Box 1 Emergency suspension orders for 2,4,5-T & Silvex, before the EPADocket nos. 409-410
 Pleadings, March-April 1979 Box 2 Pleadings, April-May 1979 Dow Chemical Co. v. Blum No. 79-10064 (U.S. Dist. Ct., E.Dist. MI, No. Div.) Affidavits in support of Plaintiff’s motion for stay of EPA’s Emergency Suspension
                                 orders. 2,4,5-T: Cancellation Hearings before the Environmental Protection Agency (1979-1984)35 boxes
 Cancellation Hearings before the EPA FIFRA Dockets nos. 415 et al.Please see Sub-group II.2 Series 2 for Background documents
 Box 1 Pleadings—Pre-hearing & discovery, April-July 1979 Box 2 Pleadings—Pre-Hearing & Discovery, August-November 1979 Box 3 Pleadings:Motion for consolidation, December 3, 1979
 Witness lists et al., December 17, 1979
 Pre-hearing, December-January 1980
 Pre-hearing conference, January 1980
 Discovery, January 1980
 Box 4 Pleadings:Discovery / Pre-hearing, January-February 1980
 Pre-trial briefs, January 1980
 Box 5 Pleadings:Discovery / Pre-hearing, February-April 1980
 Box 6 Pleadings, March-April 1980 Box 7 Pleadings:Discovery, May 1980
 Re: Protective order, June 1980
 Re: Witness testimony, June 1980
 Box 8 Pleadings:Exhibits lists, July 1980
 August-September 1980
 Box 9 Pleadings:Pre-hearing, November 1980
 Exhibit lists, November 1980
 Brief—Pre-hearing benefit brief—American Farm Bureau, January 1981
 Brief—Pre-hearing benefits brief—Dow Chemical Company, January 1981
 Brief—Pre-hearing benefits brief—National Cattlemen’s Association, January 1981
 Brief—Pre-hearing benefits—EPA, January 1981
 Pre-hearing, February 1981
 Box 10 Pleadings:Re: Motion to vacate subpoenas duces tecum against the University of Wisconsin, March
                                 1981
 October 1981-April 1982
 Box 11 Pleadings:Motions to terminate participation in proceedings, 1984
 Index to pleadings (incomplete)
 Exhibits:American Council on Science & Health
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Robert R. Bumb
 Dow Chemical Company— Direct testimony of  David Buzzelli
 Dow Chemical Company— Direct testimony of Robert Kirkpatrick
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Francis J.C. Roe
 Dow Chemical—Direct testimony of James G. Wilson
 Box 12 Exhibits:Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Bernard A. Schwetz
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Colin N. Park
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of E. Marshall Johnson
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Steven H. Lamm
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of E.G. McQueen
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Alan Argesti
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Sheldon L. Wagner
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of R.G. Reggiani
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of H. Tuchmann-Duplessis
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of John C. Ramsey
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Werner H. Braun
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Philip G. Watanbe
 Box 13 Exhibits:Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Michael A. Ibrahim
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Ralph R. Cook
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Philip Cole
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Kenneth D. Crow
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Ralph T. Ross
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Ford L. Baldwin
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Lewis A. Shadoff
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Hyland R. Johns
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Richard Wilson
 Dow Chemical Company—Direct testimony of Perry J. Gehring
 Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of Roy E. Albert
 Box 14 Exhibits:Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of Roy E. Albert
 Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of K. Diane Courtney
 Box 15 Exhibits:Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of K. Diane Courtney
 Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of Mary B. Paxton
 Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of Gary Hodgen
 Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of Wilbur P. McNulty
 Environmental Protection Agency—Direct testimony of Michael Luster
 Box 16 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Direct testimony of Michael Luster
 Direct testimony of Renate D. Kimbrough
 Direct testimony of Fredrick Kutz
 Direct testimony of William M. Upholt
 Direct testimony of Robert M. Maxey
 Direct testimony of Thomas E. Dixon
 
 Box 17
 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Environmental Protection Agency—Morton Beroza
 Environmental Protection Agency—Robert W. Baughman
 Exhibits #186-191
 Box 18 Exhibits—Environmental Protection AgencyRobert W. Baughman
 Direct testimony of Aubry E. Dupuy
 Direct testimony of Gunter Zweig
 Direct testimony of Robert R. Harless
 Direct testimony of Thomas Tiernan
 Michael L. Gross
 Box 19 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Direct testimony of James J. Boland
 Michael J. Dellarco
 Direct testimony of Emil Regelman
 Box 20 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Emil Regelman
 Direct testimony of Charles Lewis
 William Edgar Matthews
 Lester Barker
 Direct testimony of Richard Petrie
 #310-328
 George W. Keitt
 Direct testimony of William Loy
 John Anderson
 Christina Hutchinson
 Box 21 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Direct testimony of Bernard Smale
 Direct testimony of Roy E. Albert
 Direct testimony of Thomas Harrison
 Direct testimony of Thomas Ellwanger
 Direct testimony of Daniel Elam
 Direct testimony of Neil T. Skill
 Direct testimony of Ugo E. Pezzi
 Direct testimony of Jack D. Griffith
 Thomas J. Keefe
 Box 22 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Thomas J. Keefe
 Direct testimony of Robert C. Duncan
 Direct testimony of Renee Stringham
 Bonnie Hill
 Direct testimony of Ian Nisbet
 Direct testimony of James R. Yowell
 Direct testimony of Frank P. Beck, Jr.
 Rainer Frentzel-Beyme
 Box 23 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Rainer Frentzel-Beyme
 Joseph Franklin Holson
 Direct testimony of George Streisinger
 Roy E. Albert
 Direct testimony of Arthur Galston
 Direct testimony of Matthew Meselson
 Olav Axelson
 Box 24 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Olav Axelson
 Direct testimony of Robert Alfred Squire
 Direct testimony of Lennart Hardell
 Direct testimony of Richard R. Monson
 Michael L. Gross
 Direct testimony of Morton Beroza
 Direct testimony of Renate Kimbrough
 Direct testimony of Joseph S. Carra
 Direct testimony of John C. Bailar
 Robert G. Heath
 Box 25 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Robert G. Heath
 Craig Gerald Hall
 Ian Nisbet
 Lennart Hardell
 Julie K. Goetz
 Philip Sollins
 David A. Perry
 James  Burton Hart, Jr.
 Box 26 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:John Hoffmann
 Direct testimony of James Michael Frazier
 Direct testimony of Bruce E. Wilson
 Direct testimony of Chris Maser
 Direct testimony of Richard C. Koven
 Direct testimony of Howard Horowitz
 Direct testimony of Hugh Mobley
 Direct testimony of Howard Biswell
 Box 27 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Direct testimony of Will D. Carpenter
 Direct testimony of Jan Marie Newton
 Direct testimony of Anne Barton
 Direct testimony of Henry Freiser
 Direct testimony of Michael Newton
 Direct testimony of Dawn G. Porter
 Box 28 Exhibits—Environmental Protection Agency:Dawn G. Porter
 Direct testimony of Kenneth G. Thimann
 Direct testimony of Ronald Thomas
 Direct testimony of Wilbur D. Wise
 Exhibits—Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides:Direct testimony of Norma Grier
 Direct testimony of Irene Durbin
 Direct testimony of Pat Clary
 Box 29 Exhibits—Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides:Direct testimony of Phyllis Cribby
 Direct testimony of Paul Prensky
 Direct testimony of Gail Slentz
 Direct testimony of Lionel Youst
 Exhibits—U.S. Department of Agriculture:Jere Christner
 Logan Norris
 Box 30 Exhibits—U.S. Department of Agriculture:Rodney W. Bovey
 Lavell Stanger
 #68 (Source unknown)-“Biological and Economic Assessment of 2,4,5-T, 1979
 Direct testimony of Alvin Young
 Box 31 Exhibits—U.S. Department of Agriculture:Alvin Young
 Direct testimony of David A. Graham
 
 Box 32
 Exhibits—U.S. Department of Agriculture:David Graham
 Direct testimony of Roy J. Smith
 Direct testimony of Philip C. Kearney
 Direct testimony of Louis F. Bouse
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description Box 33 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description Box 34 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description Box 35 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description PCBs; 1 box National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. EPA No. 82-3166 and related cases(U.S. Ct of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)
 Pleadings, September-October 1982 Lead in gasoline (1982); 1 box EDF v. EPA No. 82-2010 (U.S. Ct of Appeals)Petition for review
 Pleadings, 1982 EPA-Report-Reducing Lead in Gasoline, costs & benefits, 1984 Clean Air Act Amendments: Regulations Preventing the Significant Deterioration of
                                    Air Quality (1978); 4 boxes Box 1 Alabama Power Co. v. Costle No. 78-1006 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.) Pleadings—Briefs of industry petitioners Alabama Power et al., December 1978 Box 2 Pleadings:Briefs of industry petitioners Alabama Power et al.
 Brief of respondents
 Brief of the American Paper Institute & National Forest Products Association
 Brief of petitioner Iron & Steel Institute
 Consolidated certificates of counsel for industry petitioners
 Box 3 Pleadings:Briefs of industry petitioners
 Box 4 Brief-Intervenor / RespondentPleadings, 1980-1982
 Land Disposal Regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(1982); 1 box
 EDF et al. v. Dietrich No. 82-1041 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.) Pleadings-Re: Application for stayPleadings-Re: Motion by the Environmental Defense Fund to supplement the record
 Pleadings-Brief for the Federal Appellants
 Pleadings-Brief of Appellee Environmental Defense Fund
 Index
 Hazardous Waste Regulations-Access to Records (1982-1983); 1 box Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund v. Office of Management & Budget No. 82-0360(U.S. District Ct., D.C.)
 Pleadings:Complaint for injunctive relief
 Motion to compel preparation of a Vaughn index
 Re: Motion for summary judgment
 Order
 Notice of appeal
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Office of Management & Budget No. 82-1265(U.S. Ct of Appeals, D.C. Circuit)
 Pleadings-Brief of appelleesPleadings-Reply brief of appellant
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Environmental Protection Agency No. 82-0362(U.S. District Ct., D.C.)
 Pleadings: Complaint for injunctive relief
 Re: Motion for summary judgment
 Order of dismissal
 Hazardous Waste Regulations (1982-1983); 1 box Box 1 Land disposal of liquid waste Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. the Environmental Protection Agency No. 82-1207(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.)
 Pleadings-Motions to intervenePleadings-Motions for stay pending appeal
 Reporting requirements Environmental Defense Fund v. the Environmental Protection Agency No. 82-1346 (U.S.
                                    Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Circuit) Pleadings-Motion for stay pending appealPleadings-Attorneys fees & costs
 Hazardous Waste Site Clean-up—Kansas City, MO (1982-1983); 2 boxes Box 1 United States of America v. Conservation Chemical Company et al. No. 82-0983-CV-W-5(U.S. District Ct., Western Dist, MO, Western Div.)
 ComplaintPleadings-Re: Defendant’s motion to dismiss, February 1983
 Box 2 Pleadings-Re: Defendant’s motion to dismiss, February 1983Memorandum of Amicus Curiae Environmental Defense Fund, May 1983
 Lead Phase-Down (1982-1983); 3 boxes Small Refiners Lead Phasedown Task Force v. Gorsuch no. 82-2308  (U.S. Ct of Appeals, D.C.)
 Box 1 Exhibits to SRTF (Small Refiner Task Force?) letter of July 30, 1982 Statements on EPA lead regulations, September 1982:On behalf of Gasoline Blenders & Terminal Operators Association
 On behalf of South Hampton Refining Company
 Comments on EPA’s proposed rule on lead in gasoline:Summary of comments on EPA’s proposal on fuel and fuel additives
 American Petroleum Refiners Association
 Caysen Corporation
 Crown Central Petroleum
 Dorchester Gas Company
 Environmental Defense Fund
 Independent Refiners Association of America
 Kern Oil and Refining Company
 Indiana Farm Bureau
 Evangeline Refining Company
 Uni Refining Company
 Mountaineer Refining Company
 Penzoil
 Box 2 Comments on EPA’s proposed rule on lead in gasoline:Sun Refining & Marketing Company
 South Hampton Refining Company
 Marion Corporation
 Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force
 Texaco
 United Refining Company
 U.S. Dept of Energy
 U.S. Dept of Justice
 U.S. Oil & Refining Company
 Wickland Oil Company
 Background & assumptions used in analyses of lead phase-down submitted to the EPA
                                 October 1982 Natural Resources Defense Council-Supplemental Appendix, January 1983 Box 3 Natural Resources Defense Council-Supplemental Appendix, January 1983 Uranium Mill Tailings (1982-1985); 2 boxes Box 1 EDF et al. v. Ruckelshaus No. 80-2039 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 10th Cir.)Petition for review of final rulemaking on disposal of uranium mill tailings
 Pleadings-Re: motion to dismiss or transfer complaint, October-November 1983 American Mining Congress v. Ruckelshaus et al. No. 83-2226 & consolidated cases(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 10th Cir.)
 Pleadings-Re: motion for summary disposition, June-July 1984 Box 2 American Mining Congress v. Ruckelshaus et al. No. 83-2226 & consolidated cases(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 10th Cir.)
 Pleadings-Brief for respondents, October 1984, undatedPleadings-Reply brief of petitioners, undated
 United Nuclear Corporation v. Ruckelshaus No. 83-2504 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 10th Cir.)
 Pleadings-Brief of appellants, December 1984 AMAX v. Ruckelshaus No. 83-2524 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 10th Cir.)
 Pleadings, 1985AMAX’s supplement to the Joint Appendix
 SERIES 2:  Background Documents Toxic Pollutant Effluent Standards for aldrin-dieldrin et al.  Federal Water Pollution
                                    Control Act Section 307 (1974-1975); 4 boxes Box 1 Carcinogens:Testimony of Robert H. Harris before the House Cttee on Public Works and Transportation,
                                 1975
 Aromatic Animes—Journal Articles
 Benzene—Journal articles
 Benzidine—notes
 Carcinogens in the environment—draft paper, n.d.
 Compounds investigated for mutagenicity—notes
 Mutagens—Journal articles
 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Section 307 Consent decree--Papers Box 2 Environmental Protection Agency:Effluent guidelines—Federal Register
 Effluent guidelines—Memoranda
 Box 3 Environmental Protection Agency:Effluent guidelines—Development—Correspondence
 Draft development document for effluent guidelines for industry—Comments
 Mercury effluent standards
 Box 4 Environmental Protection Agency:Mercury standards
 Thermal discharge standards—Federal Register & correspondence
 Tris (1977); 4 boxes Box 1 Memoranda:Memoranda to files
 Memorandum to the Consumer Product Safety Board in support of EDF’s petition to ban
                                 sales of Tris-treated wearing apparel, March 1977
 Copies of Consumer Product Safety Board’s memoranda
 Correspondence:Bruce Ames’ letter re: carcinogenicity
 EDF correspondence with consumers
 EDF correspondence with Consumer Product Safety Board
 EDF correspondence with garment industry
 EDF correspondence with press
 EDF correspondence with scientists
 Media:Press releases—EDF
 Letter to the editor of Science article: “Tris Controversy” Vol. 197, no. 4299
 Harris, R. (1977). The trouble with tris. The Fire Independent, pp. 2-3, 18-20.
 Reports:American Apparel Manufacturers’ Association—Report to garment industry, 1975-1976
 Box 2 Reports:Consumer Product Safety Commission—Animal studies & risk assessment
 Institute of Environmental Medicine—Carcinogenic potential
 Testimony:April 1977: Statement of Robert Rauch before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer,
                                 & Monetary Affairs of the Committee on Government Operations
 April 1977: Testimony of Robert H. Harris before the Consumer Subcommittee of the
                                 Senate Committee on Commerce, Service & Transportation May 1977: Statement of Robert H. Harris & Robert Rauch before the Subcommittee on
                                 Commerce, Consumer & Monetary Affairs of the Committee on Government Operations May 1977: Statement of Robert H. Harris before the Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations
                                 of the House Committee on Interstate & Foreign Commerce September 1977: Statement of Robert H. Harris before the Subcommittee on Consumer
                                 Protection & Finance Committee on Interstate & Foreign Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives
                                 & Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigation Data:Carcinogenicity & dose / response for Tris
 Estimate of human lifetime carcinogenic risk from exposure to Tris
 NCI-Carcinogenic bioassay experimental design status report
 Meetings:National Advisory Committee for the Flammable Fabrics Ac—minutes, 1971
 Consumer Protection Safety Board meeting with Environmental Defense Fund, 1977
 Data Evaluation Sub-group of the Clearinghouse on Environmental Carcinogens—2nd meeting
                                 minutes, 1977
 Surveys:Market survey, 1977
 Box 3 Surveys:NYS Consumers Protection Board—1977 Infant & Children’s Sleepwear Survey
 Consumer Protection Safety Board questionnaire
 Subject Files:Chronic Issue Statement—Consumer Protection Safety Board
 Export of tris-treated fabrics
 Flame retardants—alternatives to tris
 Flammability standards
 Organophosphates
 Tris—Skin absorption
 Tris—Toxicity
 Box 4 Flammable Fabrics:Chronology / History
 Trade journal articles
 Reports-National Bureau of Standards
 Vinyl Chloride Emissions (1977); 1 box Box 1 Publications removed to be cataloged: Baille, R.C., Riley, B.T., Zaltzman, R. (1973). Environmental impact assessment of polyvinylchloride as packaging material for distilled spirits. [Washington, D.C.]: Bureau of Alcohol,
 Firearms & Tobacco, Treasury Dept, Internal Revenue Service.
 Environmental Protection Agency. (1974). Preliminary assessment of environmental problemsassociated with vinyl chloride & polyvinyl chloride: Report of the activities
                                    & findings of the Vinyl Chloride Task Force. Washington D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency Office of Toxic
 Substances.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Standards & Engineering Division. (1975).
                                 Organicchemical processing volume 7: Selected processes.  Research Triangle Park, NC:
 Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air, Noise & Radiation, Office of
                                 Air Quality
 Planning & Standards.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Planning Standards, Emission Standards
                                 & Engineering Division. (1976). Standards support & environmental impact statement: Volume 2: Promulgated emission
                                    standard for vinyl chloride. Research Triangle Park, NC:  Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air & Waste
                                 Management, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Engineering & Technology.
                                 (1977?). A sulfate episode: August 16 to August 29, 1976. Washington D.C.: Author.
 Evans, L.B. (1975). Vinyl chloride monomer emissions from the polyvinyl chloride processingindustries. Cambridge MA: Arthur D. Little, Inc.
 Hushon, J. Kornreich, M. (1976). Air pollution assessment of vinylidene chloride. McLean, VA:MITRE Corporation.
 Landau, E., Brinkman, C.P., Manos, N.E. (1975). Epidemiology studies: Task III, vinyl chloride.Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency Office of Toxic Substances.
 United Nations Environment Programme. (1981). Annual Review 1981. Nairobi, Kenya: Author. Filed in document case: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development. (1975). Scientific & technicalassessment report on vinyl chloride & polyvinyl chloride. Washington D.C.: Author.
 Meeting of Environmental Protection Agency & Society of Plastics Industry Inc. Transcript
                                 of proceedings, June 1977. Public Hearing on vinyl chloride before the Environmental Protection Agency. Transcript
                                 of proceedings, July 1977. Houston Research, Inc. (1975). Progress report: Ozone / UV process in 100 percent elimination ofvinyl chloride. Houston, Texas: Author.
 State of California, Air Resources Board, Research Division. (1977). Staff report #78-1-1: Effectsof airborne vinyl chloride. Unpublished.
 State of California, Air Resources Board, Research Division. (1978). Public hearing to consider alimitation on ambient concentrations of vinyl chloride.  Unpublished.
 Asbestos in Schools (1979); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1979Correspondence—Purchase inquiries for manual
 Media:Press releases—EDF
 Articles—EDF
 Re: community outreach
 Petition to the Environmental Protection Agency to control asbestos emissions from
                                 spray on materials which have been applied in public school buildings for insulation,
                                 fireproofing, decorative or other purposes, December 1978 Comments of EDF on EPA’s Advanced Notice of proposed rulemaking on asbestos-containing
                                 materials in public schools, November 5, 1979 Brochures Journal articles by subject:Effects on health
 Ingested asbestos
 Asbestos in public schools
 Reports by author:Consumer Product Safety Commission
 Environmental Protection Agency
 Box 2 Reports:EPA--Asbestos in schools identification & notification rule
 National Institute on Environmental Health Sciences
 United States Geological Survey
 Conference papers Box 3 Manuals:Asbestos Abatement/Control Guidance Manual—NYC Board of Education, n.d.
 Manual for Asbestos-Sprayed Materials in Schools—EDF (?)
 Draft chapter of “Clearing the Air” a guide to the asbestos problem in schools, ca.
                                 1981 Legislation Publications—Removed for cataloging:Bradfield, REN. (1977). Asbestos: Reviews of uses, health effects, measurement & control.
 Surrey England: Atkins Research and Development.
 Environmental Protection Agency. (1979). Asbestos-containing materials in school buildings:A guidance document. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency,
 Office of Toxic Substances.
 Environmental Protection Agency. (1980). Asbestos containing materials in school buildings:Guidance for asbestos analytical programs. Washington D.C.: Environmental
 Protection Agency, Office of Toxic Substances.
 Levine, R.J., editor. (1978). Asbestos: An information resource. Washington,D.C.:Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
 NIOSH, OSHA Asbestos Working Group. (1980). Workplace exposure to asbestos. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services.
 Box 4 Batelle Corporation-Report to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1978Environmental Protection Agency-Memorandum-Numerical system for assessing exposure
                                 to asbestos in schools, 1979
 Environmental Analysis Laboratories-Information packet, 1979
 Environmental Protection Agency-Technical support document-Asbestos containing materials
                                 in public school buildings, 1980
 Johns-Manville Sales Corporation-Annual Report, 1977
 League of Women Voters-Pamphlets, handbooks, 1970s
 U.S. Dept of Justice-Attorney General’s liability report to Congress, 1981
 2,4,5-T Background documents; 4 boxes Box 1 Subject File—Silvex Adamson, L. (1974). Spray now, pay later? Environmental Action. Comments of the Dow Chemical Company on the paper, Spray now, pay later?
 Environmental Protection Agency—Papers on the Dioxin Monitoring Program, 1974-1975 Box 2 Environmental Protection Agency:Papers on the Dioxin Monitoring Program, 1974-1975
 EPA Meeting to discuss monitoring of TCDD in the environment [correspondence], 1974
 Minutes & reports of the Toxicology Working Group , 1976
 Silvex and 2,4,5-T position documents
 Box 3 Hickey, G.C. (1974). The effects of herbicides in South Vietnam. Washington D.C. 5 parts. Box 4 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description Sub-group II.3 Toxic Chemicals Program-Projects SERIES 1:  Committees and Meetings  Toxic Substances Control (1977-1980) Box 1 Toxic Substances Control Act-Committee on Testing Guidelines—Meeting papers, 1977-1978EPA-Administrator’s Toxic Substances Advisory Committee—Meeting papers, 1978
 Conservation Foundation-Dialogue Group Steering Committee—Meeting papers, 1980
 Conservation Foundation-National Citizens Program on Toxic Substances Control—Meeting
                                 papers
 Conservation Foundation-International Toxics Steering Committee—Meeting papers, 1980
 Global Resources & Environment Task Force (1980); 9 boxes Box 1 Correspondence-Global 2000 Report follow-up-List of priority issues, 1980Memoranda-Tasks, 1980
 Media-on Global 2000
 Box 2 Task Force Scope—Memoranda, August 1980White House EOP Information Center—database printouts, August 1980
 Program Inventory—Responses of federal agencies to information request, August-September
                                 1980
 Box 3 Executive Order 12114 (Environmental effects abroad of major federal actions)-Documents,
                                 September 1980Hearing on Global 2000 Report before the Subcommittee on International Economics &
                                 Joint Economics Committee, September 1980
 Global 2000 Report—Comments, October 1980
 Box 4 Global 2000 Report—Comments, October-November 1980Global 2000 meeting papers, October 1980
 Global 2000-Science, Technology & Development-Memoranda, October 1980
 Averting catastrophe: The global challenge. Report of the Subcommittee on International
                                 Economics of the Joint Economic Committee, October 10, 1980 Managing the Federal Government: Role of the President—National Academy of Public
                                 Administration, October 1980 Task I: Data collection & modeling Box 5 Task I: Data collection & modeling—draft reports, collected articlesTask II: Underdevelopment & poverty—draft reports
 Task III: Ensuring priority federal attention—Recommendations
 Task IV: International organizations—Report
 Task V: Population—Report
 Task VI: Food & loss of agricultural land—Recommendations
 Box 6 Task VI: Food & loss of agricultural land—soil conservationTask VII: Tropical deforestation—Draft recommendations
 Task VIII: Species extinction & genetic diversity—Report
 Task IX: Global environmental contamination problem—Meeting papers
 Task X: Atmospheric & climate problems—Comments
 Task XI: Water supply & management—Report
 Task XII: Conservation of coastal & marine resources—Recommendations
 Task XIII: Renewable energy & energy conservation--Recommendations
 Task XIV: Public awareness—Recommendations
 Box 7 Office of Technology Assessment—Memoranda, November 1980Desertification initiatives—Memoranda, November 1980
 Conference reports—Memoranda, November 1980
 Draft statement of the Task Force to the President, November 1980 American Foreign Policy: More global, less Fun—Harlan Cleveland, U of Minnesota Global 2000 Report & Task Force activities—Brief comments from Congress, November
                                 1980 The Global future: Ours to create –Task Force report, November 1980 Report of the President’s Task Force on Resources & the Environment (incomplete?) Draft report of the Global Resources & Environment Task Force—Comments Global 2000 Citizens Committee, December 1980 U.S. Arms Control & Disarmament Agency—Task Force report submission, December 1980 Box 8 Global Future: Time to Act -Report to the President on Global Resources, Environment & Population, January 1981
 Leadership Conference on Population, Resources, & Environment, January 1981 Box 9 Global Coalition—Agendas, bylaws, February 1981 Entering the 21st Century: The Global 2000 Report. Harry R. Marshall, Acting Assistant
                                 Secretary, Bureau of Oceans & Internaitonal, Environmental, & Scientific Affairs,
                                 U.S. Dept. of State. Speech before the American Astronautical Society, March 1981 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description (3 boxes) SERIES 2:  Project Files Potomac River Basin Water Quality—Collected Reports (1969-1975) Box 1 U.S. Dept of the Interior Publications: Lear, D. W., & Jaworski, N. A. (1969). Sanitary bacteriology of the upper Potomac Estuary. [Washington, D.C.?]: Chesapeake Technical Support Laboratory, Middle Atlantic
                                 Region,
 Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, U.S. Dept. of the Interior.
 Jaworski, N. A., Villa, O., & Hetling, L. J. (1969). Nutrients in the Potomac River Basin. [S.l.]: Chesapeake Technical Support Laboratory, Middle Atlantic Region, Federal
                                 Water Pollution
 Control Administration.
 Jaworski, N. A., & Clark, L. J. (1970). Physical data, Potomac River tidal system, includingmathematical model segmentation. [Washington]: Chesapeake Technical Suppert
 Laboratory, Middle Atlantic Region, Federal Water Quality Administration,
 U.S. Dept. of the Interior.
 Aalto, J. A., Jaworski, N. A., & Lear, D. W. (1970). Current water quality conditions andinvestigations in the Upper Potomac River tidal system. [Annapolis, MD]: Chesapeake
 Technical Support Laboratory, Middle Atlantic Region, Federal Water Pollution Control
                                 Administration, U.S. Dept. of the Interior.
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Publications: Clark, L. J. (1972). Mathematical model studies of water quality in the Potomac estuary. [S.l.]:Annapolis Field Office, Region III, Environmental Protection Agency.
 Clark, L. J., & Jaworski, N. A. (1972). Nutrient transport and dissolved oxygen budget studies in the Potomac Estuary. Environmental Protection Agency.
 Aalto, J. A. (1972). The Potomac River estuary in the Washington metropolitan area: A history of itswater quality problems and their solution. Philadelphia: U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency, Annapolis Field Office, Region III.
 Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Palmer, R. N., & Delp, E. (1976). Critical areas in the Potomac River basin: A review of water pollution control in 1975. ICPRB technical publication, 76-4. Bethesda, Md: Interstate
 Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
 PCBs; 3 boxesNote: See also: Proposed toxic pollutant effluent standards
 Box 1 Legislation, 1975 Army Engineer District-Comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. 
                                 on proposal for maintenance dredging of the Hudson River from New York City to Waterford,
                                 1975 Environmental Protection Agency-Toxic pollutants-Correspondence, statements, 1975 Environmental Protection Agency-Report-Monitoring of the General Electric Hudson Falls
                                 facility, 1975 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Section 307—Memoranda, Federal Register, 1973-1974 Food & Drug Administration/HEW-Final environmental impact statement on rulemaking
                                 on polychlorinated biphenyls, 1972 Interdisciplinary Task Force on PCBs—PCBs in the Environment (report), 1972 Monsanto Chemical Corporation-Comments to the U.S. Dept of Commerce, 1974 Box 2 Natural Resources Defense Council-PCBs in the Hudson River-Statements, correspondence,
                                 1975 N.O.A.A.-Letter to the EPA on effluent discharge, 1974 Proposed toxic pollutant effluent standards-FWPCA Section 307:Transcript of testimony-Gerald J. Lauer
 Transcript of testimony-Paul Wright
 Transcript of testimony-E. Scott Tucker
 Transcript of testimony-W.B. Papageorge
 Reports/Reprints:Monsanto Chemical Company
 Science journals-PCBs in animals
 Science journals-PCBs in fish
 Science journals-PCBs in soil
 Box 3 PCB data Toxic Substances and the Workplace (1972-1978); 2 boxes Box 1 Subject Files: Farm worker health & safety:Correspondence, 1972
 Hearing before the House Subcommittee on Agricultural Labor, September 1972
 Pleadings (non-Environmental Defense Fund), 1972
 Report—Pesticide exposure & protection of California workers-Stanford University,
                                 1970
 Report—Impact of Federal programs to improve living conditions of workers—Comptroller
                                 General, 1973
 OSHA proposed rules for the identification, classification & regulation of toxic substances
                                 posing a potential occupational carcinogenic risk:Federal Register, October 1977
 OSHA’s cancer policy—Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund, January 1978
 OSHA’s generic carcinogen proposal—Report on alternatives—American Industrial Health
                                 Council
 OSHA Hearing on proposed rules, Docket no. 090:Notice of intention to appear
 Comments—Natural Resources Defense Council, February 1978
 Comments—Marvin A. Schneiderman, April 1978
 Post hearing brief—Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund,
                                 Urban Environment Conference, October 1978
 Box 2 Benzene exposure:Clippings, 1978, 1980
 OSHA standard-draft brief?, no author, no date
 Draft letter to Solicitor General Wade H. McCree, Jr., 1978
 Lead:Proposed OSHA standard for exposure to lead, public hearing agenda, 1977
 Lead in the Human Environment-Workshop papers, 1978
 Journal articles, reports
 Occupational Safety & Health—Journal articles, bulletins, 1970s Wastewater Management-Reports (1973-1975); 2 boxes Box 1 Bauer Engineering. (1974). Wastewater management opportunities, Boulder, Colorado: A study of alternatives. Boulder, CO: Bauer Engineering.
 District of Columbia Dept of Environmental Services—Wastewater treatment plant, 1976 Box 2 United States. (1974). Final environmental impact statement District of Columbia water pollutioncontrol plant: (expansion and upgrading). Philadelphia, PA: Environmental Protection
 Agency Region III.
 United States. (1973). Potomac Estuary emergency water pumping station: Draft environmentalstatement.
 Ralph M. Parsons Co. (1975). Pumped storage project W-133, Montgomery County, MD. [Washington, D.C.?]: Ralph M. Parsons Co.
 Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1974-1977); 3 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1974, 1977 Federal Water Pollution Control Act—U.S. Dept of the Interior, 1970 Amendments:Interim staff report of the Subcommittee on Investigations & Review on the amendments
                                 to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
 Water quality strategy papers—Environmental Protection Agency, 1974
 Legislation—clean water, 1975
 Clean Water Coalition meeting papers, ca. 1976
 Toxics regulation—testimony of Robert Harris before the Cttee on Public Works & Transportation
 Box 2 Amendments:Toxics regulation—Subcttee on Investigation & Review staff memorandum, 1977
 Toxics regulation—Documents—Environmental Protection Agency
 Section 208 Planning:Correspondence—Environmental Defense Fund, 1974
 Correspondence—Natural Resources Defense Council, 1974
 Non-point source control—Documents—Environmental Protection Agency
 Section 404:Oversight Hearings—Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund, 1976
 Disposal of dredged or fill material—Documents—Environmental Protection Agency
 Consent decree—Correspondence—Natural Resources Defense Council, 1977 Box 3 Consent decree—Meeting on consent decree/TSCA monitoring proposal, 1977National Commission on Water Quality—Report, 1975
 Waste treatment facilities—Report—Environmental Protection Agency, 1975
 Safe Drinking Water—Louisiana (1974-1977); 3 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1974-1977Memoranda, 1973-1974
 Media:Clippings
 Press releases—EPA / EDF
 American Water Works Association Press Conference [Memoranda], 1974
 Harris, R.H., Epstein, S.S (1975). Cancer causing substances in drinking water.Draft article for The New York Times.
 Department of the Interior—Water Situation in Louisiana, 1975-1976Ecology Center of Louisiana & other citizen groups—Newsletter & correspondence
 Environmental Defense Fund (1974). The implications of cancer-causing substancesin the Mississippi River. Report.
 Statement by Ralph Nader, Robert Harris on the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1973 before the Subcommittee on the Environment, Committee on Commerce, U.S. Senate.
 Box 2 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund on behalf of the Ecology Center of Louisiana
                                 & Citizens for Lake Action for emergency action on drinking water under the Safe Drinking
                                 Water Act, n.d. EPA—Ad Hoc Study Group to consider organics in drinking waterEPA—Drinking water brochures
 Subject Files—Jefferson ParishSubject Files—Industrial sources of carcinogens in the Mississippi River
 Box 3 Data Vegetation Management with Herbicides (1974-1975); 3 boxes Box 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1973). Vegetative management project using selective herbicides: Colville National Forest, Okanogan & Wenatchee National
                                    Forests.
 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1973). Vegetative management project using selective herbicides: Mt. Hood, Rogue River & Willamette National Forests.
 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1974). Vegetative management project using selective herbicides: Deschutes, Fremont, Ochoco & Winema National Forests.
 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1974). Vegetative management project using selective herbicides: Gifford Pinchot, Mt. Baker, Olympic, & Snoqualmie
                                    National Forests.
 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1975). Vegetative management project using selective herbicides: Malheur, Umatilla, & Wallowa-Whitman National Forests.
 Box 2 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1975). Vegetative management project using selective herbicides: Siskiyou, Siuslaw, & Umpqua National Forests.
 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service. (1976). Vegetation management with herbicides. Final environmental statement.
 Box 3 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service-Southern Region. (1975). Vegetation managementwith herbicides: Ozark-St. Francis National Forests. Draft environmental
                                    statement.
 U.S. Forest Service-Alaska Region. (1975). Herbicide use on national forests of Alaska. Final environmental impact statement.
 U.S. Forest Service-Alaska Region. (1975). Herbicide use on national forests of Alaska. Environmental statement, final addendum.
 Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (1975-1977); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1975, 1977Memoranda, 1975-1977
 Media—ClippingsMedia—Press releases—EPA
 Drinking water standards—Federal Register, 1974Drinking water standards—EPA Advisory Committee, 1973
 Box 2 Drinking water standards—Environmental Protection Agency:Proposed drinking water standards, 1975
 National drinking water strategy, 1975
 Safe drinking water annual report (incomplete?), 1975
 Underground injection control program
 Statement of basis and purpose for an amendment to the National Interim Drinking Water
                                 Standards for trihalomethanes, 1977 Proposed regulation for chloroform & thms in drinking water Economic impact analysis of a trihalomethane regulation for drinking water, 1977 Regulations to control organic contaminants in drinking water, ca. 1976 Box 3 Drinking water standards:Report—Federal Drinking Water Regulation, Nicholas A. Robinson, Esq., 1975
 Comments—Clean Water Coalition
 Comments--Environmental Defense Fund
 Petition for review of interim drinking water standards—Environmental Defense Fund,
                                 1975
 Box 4 Drinking water standards:Petition for review of interim drinking water standards—Environmental Defense Fund,
                                 1975
 EPA—National Drinking water Advisory Council Drinking Water / Water Supply (1975); 7 boxes Box 1 Subject Files:Fluoride in water
 National Drinking water survey—Environmental Protection Agency
 Box 2 National Drinking Water Survey—EDF mailingOhio River Basin Commission, Letter of Robert Harris to President Carter, 1978
 Organic compounds in drinking water
 Second Task Force on Research Planning in Environmental Health Science
 Utility company lands—Connecticut
 Wastewater—recycling—California
 Wastewater—Activated carbon treatment of raw sewage
 Box 3 Wastewater—Survey of Two Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants for Toxic SubstancesWater Quality—California
 Water Quality—Florida
 Water Quality—Illinois
 Water Quality—Maryland
 Water Quality—Massachusetts
 Water Quality—New Mexico
 Water Quality—New York
 Box 4 Water Quality—New YorkWater Quality—Ohio
 Box 5 Water Quality—OhioWater Quality—Philadelphia
 Box 6 Water Quality--TennesseeWater Quality—Virginia
 Water Quality—Wyoming
 Box 7 Nader, R., Harris. R.H. (1973). Sorry for the inconvenience, this water is poisoned.
                                 Typescript submitted to The Nation.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1974). A summary and evaluation of selected state drinking water systems. Report.
 Harris, R.H., Epstein, S.S. (n.d.). Cancer-causing substances in drinking water.Typescript.
 Plastic Bottles / Bottle Deposit Legislation (1975, 1977) Box 1 Correspondence, 1975, 1977 Testimony-Arthur P. Cooley on behalf of EDF on solid waste management, 1977 Reports by topic:Environmental & health problems of plastic bottles-Natural Resources Defense Council,
                                 1976
 Final Environmental Impact Statement-Plastic bottles for carbonated beverages & beer—Federal
                                 Drug Administration, 1976
 Bottle deposit legislation in Vermont—Jeffords / Webster, 1977
 X-rays / Radiation-Collected Reports (1975-1977) Box 1 United States. (1976). Radiation protection guidance for diagnostic x rays. Federal guidance report,            no. 9. Washington: The Agency.
 Federal Radiation Council (U.S.). (1961). Background material for the development of radiation protection standards. Staff report of the Federal Radiation Council, report no. 2.
 Washington, D.C.: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. (1975). Review of the current state of radiation protection philosophy: Recommendations of the National Council
                                    on Radiation
 Protection and Measurements. Washington: The Council.
 United States. (1972). Report on program for control of electromagnetic pollution of theenvironment; the assessment of biological hazards of nonionizing electromagnetic
                                    radiation.
 Washington: United States, Office of Telecommunications Policy].
 Gitlin, J. N., & Lawrence, P. S. (1966). Population exposure to X-rays, U.S. 1964; A report on thePublic Health Service X-ray exposure study. [Washington]: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education,
 and Welfare, Public Health Service; [for sale by the Superintendent of
                                 Documents,
 U.S. Govt. Print. Off.
 Center for Devices and Radiological Health (U.S.), & United States. (1976). Regulations for the administration and enforcement of the Radiation Control for Health and
                                    Safety Act of 1968.
 Rockville, Md: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
                                 Service,
 Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health.
 Water Supply—Washington D.C. (1975-1977); 9 boxesNote: see also Sub-group III.2 Series 1 & 2-Blue Plains Sewage Treatment Plant
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1975 American Fisheries Society:A Review of the EPA Red Book: Quality Criteria for Water, 1978
 D.C. Department of Environmental Services:Position papers (drafts), 1972
 Environmental Defense Fund:Testimony at hearing on Emergency Pumping Station, Potomac Estuary, 1976
 Hearings before the House Cttee on the District of Columbia—Correspondence, 1976
 Environmental Protection Agency:Report—Potomac River Enforcement Conference progress meeting, 1972
 Report—Potomac Estuary nutrient transport & dissolved oxygen budget studies, 1972
 Box 2 Environmental Protection Agency:Conference proceedings—Pollution of the interstate waters of the Potomac, Vols 1-2,
                                 1970
 Water resource-water supply study of the Potomac Estuary, April 1971
 Final environmental impact statement-upgrading & expansion of the WSSC Piscataway
                                 Wastewater Treatment Facility, 1974
 Box 3 Fairfax County Water Authority:Proposed water supply facilities—Report & map, 1975
 Subject file—Green Briar Waste Treatment Facility Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin:Potomac Basin Reporter, 1974-1975
 Report—Water quality, 1974
 Report—Water supply, n.d.
 Maryland Environmental Services:Report—Water resource analysis, 1973
 Report--Potomac-Metropolitan Area Water Quality Management Plan, 1974
 Box 4 Maryland Environmental Services:Report--Potomac-Metropolitan Area Water Quality Management Plan, 1974
 Maryland Water Resources Administration:Report--Patuxent River Basin Water Quality Management Program, 1977
 Box 5 Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments:Report—modeling
 Documents—Chlorophyll a
 Montgomery County Advanced Sewage Treatment Plant National Society of Professional Engineers:Report—Water supply, 1972
 U.S. Department of the Army:Memorandum—Preliminary program for water supply, n.d.
 Box 6 U.S. Department of the Army:Report—Potomac Estuary as water supply, 1971
 Proceedings of public meetings, re: dam and lake projects, 1973
 Impact statement supplement—Sixes Bridge Dam & Lake
 Box 7 U.S. Department of the Army:Report—Water supply program alternatives, 1974
 Reports—Water supply studies, 1975
 Report—Estuary water treatment plant, 1976
 U.S. Department of the Interior:Conference proceedings—Pollution of the interstate waters of the Potomac River Vol.
                                 1, 1969
 Box 8 U.S. Department of the Interior:Conference proceedings—Pollution of the interstate waters of the Potomac River Vols.
                                 2-3, 1969
 Progress evaluation meeting—Pollution of the interstate waters of the Potomac River,
                                 1969 Transcript of conference—Pollution of the interstate waters of the Potomac River…,
                                 1958 Box 9 Washington Area Interstate Water Resources Program:Report—Action program for the metropolitan area, 1972
 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission:Report—Potomac River, 1974
 Report—Wastewater treatment, 1977
 Report—Feasibility of land treatment of wastewater, Prince George & Montgomery Counties,
                                 1977
 Recombinant DNA Research Regulations (1976-1979); 3 boxes Box 1 Correspondence—Environmental Defense Fund, 1976-1978Memoranda—Environmental Defense Fund, 1976-1977
 Media—Draft rebuttal to James D. Watson’s May 14, 1978 Washington Post editorialMedia—Journal articles,
 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund and the Natural Resources Defense Council
                                 to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to hold hearings & promulgate regulations
 under the Public Health Service Act governing recombinant DNA activities, 1976
 Recombinant DNA research—NYS:Testimony of Burke K. Zimmerman (EDF) before a hearing of the NYS Attorney General’s
                                 Office
 on recombinant DNA research, October 1976
 Report of the New York State Attorney General Louis J. Lefkowitz on recombinant DNA
                                 research, 1977 Hearings before the Senate Health Subcommittee on recombinant DNA research:Comments of Burke K. Zimmerman, September 1976
 Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Senate
                                 Committee on Human Resources:Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund, April 1977
 Testimony of Friends of the Earth
 Testimony of Donald S. Fredrickson, Director, NIH
 Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on Science, Technology & Space of the Committee
                                 on Commerce, Science and Transportation:
 Testimony of Roy Curtis III
 Testimony of Bruce R. Levin
 Testimony of Marc Lappe
 Testimony of Paul Berg
 Testimony of Philip Handler, National Academy of Sciences
 Box 2 Legislation:Interim Report of the Federal Interagency Committee on Recombinant DNA Research: Suggested
                                 Elements for Legislation, 1977
 Senate & House bills H.R. 111792 (Recombinant DNA Act)—Comments, 1978S.1217--Comments
 National Institutes of Health—Guidelines for Recombinant DNA Research:Recombinant DNA research project, Harvard Medical School—FOIA request of the Environmental
                                 Defense Fund, 1977
 Correspondence—1977, 1979 Proposed guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules, 1976Comments on proposed guidelines
 Hearings on revised NIH guidelines:Testimony & statements, September 1978
 Box 3 National Institutes of Health—Guidelines for Recombinant DNA Research:Administrative practices supplement to the NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant
                                 DNA molecules, 1978
 Federal Register—Department of Health, Education and Welfare—NIH:Proposed revised guidelines, 197-1978
 Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH:Copies of correspondence, 1978-1979, 1981
 Meeting documents, February 1976
 Meeting documents, December 1977
 Meeting documents, March 1980
 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act-Regulations (1976-1984); 3 boxes Box 1 Proposed regulations on disposal standards-EPA documents, 1976Hazardous waste regulations meeting-Summary materials-EPA, 1977
 Proposed regulations for classification of solid waste facilities-Comments of Environmental
                                 Action
 Proposed regulations for classification of solid waste facilities-EPA documents, 1977
 Proposed schedule for promulgating regulations under RCRA
 Proposed regulations on confidential information-Federal Register, 1978
 Guidelines for state solid waste management plans-EPA, 1978
 Proposed standards for generators of hazardous waste-EPA, 1978
 Proposed regulations for classification of hazardous waste disposal facilities, 1978
 Standards for owners & operators of facilities, 1978
 RCRA reauthorization amendments-drafts, 1979
 Box 2 RCRA reauthorization amendments-Copies of correspondence, 1979Regulations promulgated May 1980-Copies of correspondence, 1980-1981
 Hazardous waste facilities siting-Reports, 1980
 Standards applicable to owners & operators of facilities-Comments of the EPA, 1980
 Hazardous waste facilities siting-Statute-Chemical Manufacturers Association, 1980
 H.R. 7020-Hazardous waste facilities-Letter of EDF to Jeff Goodman, 1980
 Box 3 RCRA Hazardous Wastes Handbook, 3rd Ed., Volume 1Groundwater protection-Notes
 RCRA performance goals-Environmental Defense Fund memorandum, 1984
 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)-Testing Materials for Carcinogenicity (1977-1978);6 boxes
 Box 1 Carcinogenesis Testing Program-National Cancer Institute-National Institutes of Health: Bioassays:1,2-Dichloroethane
 1,4-Dioxane
 1,5-Naphthalenediamine
 2-Aminoanthraquinone
 1-Amino-2-Methylanthraquinone
 2-Amino-5-Nitrothiazole
 3-Amino-9-Ethylcarbazole
 3-Sufolene
 4-Chloro-o-Phenylenediamine
 5-Nitro-Anisidine
 Acronycine
 Aniline Hydrochloride
 Aspirin, Caffeine, Phenacetin mixture
 Daminozide
 Box 2 Bioassays:ICRF-159
 L-Tryptophan
 m-Cresidine
 N-Phenyl-p-Phenylenediamine
 p-Cresidine
 Phenoxybenzamine
 Phensterin
 Trichlorofluoromethane
 TRIS
 List of chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the Bioassay Program, 1977 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1977). Bioassays of aldrin and dieldrin for possible carcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institutes
 of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.), & Steinberg, M. (1977). Bioassay of photodieldrin for possiblecarcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institutes
 of Health, Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.), & Steinberg, M. (1977). Bioassay of dapsone for possiblecarcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institutes
 of Health, Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention.
 Box 3 NIH-Clearinghouse on Environmental Carcinogens-Experimental Design Sub-group:Meeting minutes, November 2, 1977
 NIH-Clearinghouse on Environmental Carcinogens-Chemical Selection Sub-group:Meeting minutes, November 1 & December 19, 1977
 NIH-Clearinghouse on Environmental Carcinogens-Data Evaluation/Risk Assessment Sub-group:Meeting minutes, January 18, 1978
 Clement Associates-Dossiers:1,1,1-Trichloroethane
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether
 2,6-Dichloro-4-Nitroaniline
 Alkyl Epoxides
 Alkyl Phthalates
 Alpha-Chlorotoluene
 Antimony Trioxide
 Benzoyl Chloride
 Bis (2-Chloro Ethoxy Methane
 Carbon Tetrabromide
 Chlorinated Benzenes
 Chlorinated Naphthalalenes
 Chlorinated Paraffins, 35-64% Chlorine
 Chloroethane
 Cresols
 Box 4 Dossiers:Ethylene, 1,1-Dichloro-
 Formamide
 Hexabromobenzene
 Hexachloro-1, 3-Butadiene
 Hydroquinone
 meta-Nitroaniline
 meta-Chloroaniline
 para-Chloroaniline
 N-Phenyl-2-Naphthylamine
 Nitrobenzene
 Pigment Yellow 12
 Polychlorinated Terphenyls
 Pyridine
 Titanium Dioxide
 Toluene
 Xylenes
 TSCA Interagency Testing Committee:Initial report to the Administrator, EPA [Federal Register], October 1977
 Interagency Collaborative Group on Environmental Carcinogenesis-Meeting minutes,October 19, 1977
 Box 5 TSCA Interagency Testing Committee:Meeting agendas and papers, 1977-1978
 Box 6 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1978). Bioassay of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane for possible carcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
 Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division
                                 of Cancer Cause
 and Prevention.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1978). Bioassay of 2-methyl-1-nitroanthraquinone for possiblecarcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
 Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division
                                 of Cancer Cause
 and Prevention.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1978). Bioassay of 3,3'-iminobis-1-propanol dimethanesulfonate (ester) hydrochloride (IPD) for possible carcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health,
 Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of
                                 Health, National Cancer
 Institute, Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1977). Bioassay of lindane for possible carcinogenicity:[CAS no. 58-89-9]. DHEW publication, no. (NIH) 77-814. Bethesda, Md: U.S. Dept. of
 Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, NIH.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1978). Bioassay of nitrofen for possible carcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National
                                 Institutes of
 Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention.
 National Cancer Institute (U.S.). (1977). Bioassay of tetrachloroethylene for possible carcinogenicity. Bethesda, Md: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
 Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division
                                 of Cancer Cause
 and Prevention, Carcinogenesis Program, Carcinogen Bioassay and Program
                                 Resources
 Branch.
 Clement Associates. (1977). Information dossiers on substances designated by TSCA InteragencyTesting Committee. Washington: Clement Associates.
 Benzene-Emissions Standards / Effects on Health—Collected Reports (1977-1981); 4 boxes
 Box 1 EDF—Petition to the Environmental Protection Agency to add benzene to list of major
                                 pollutants under section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 1977 EPA—Copies of correspondence re: health effectsEPA—Copies of correspondence from oil & chemical companies
 United States. (1978). Standard support environmental impact statement for control of benzene from the maleic anhydride industry. [Draft Report, 1978]. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: The Agency.
 EPA—Draft proposed standards for benzene emissions from coke by-product recovery plants,
                                 1981 Boxes 2-3 Mawn, P. E. (1976). Economic impact of stage II vapor recovery regulations: Working memoranda.Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Waste
 Management, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
 Walker, P. (1976). Air pollution assessment of benzene. McLean, Virginia: the Mitre corporation. United States. (1977). Benzene health effects assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
 Pellizzari, E. D. (1978). Quantification of chlorinated hydrocarbons in previously collectedair samples. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: The Office.
 Turner, F. C., Felten, J. R., & Kittrell, J. R. (1978). Cost of benzene reduction in gasoline to thepetroleum refining industry. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Environmental Protection
 Agency, Office of Air and Waste Management, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
 Box 4 Manning, J. A., & Johnson, R. (1977). Atmospheric benzene emissions. Cincinnati, OH: PEDco Environmental.
 Mara, S. J., & Lee, S. S. (1977). Human exposures to atmospheric benzene. Menlo Park, Calif: Stanford Research Institute.
 Toxic Substances Control Act (1977-1980); 5 boxes Box 1 General:Toxic substances print comparing S.426 as passed by the Senate & House
 Federal Register, 1979-1980
 Environmental Protection Agency—brochure, 1977
 Media—articles
 Section 4e-Interagency Testing CommitteeInteragency Testing Committee-Federal Register-Report to the Administrator, 1977
 Interagency Testing Committee-Citizens for a Better Environment-Comments on reporting
                                 regulations, 1978
 Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group-Report-Scientific Bases for Identifying Potential
                                 Carcinogens & their Risks, n.d.
 Section 5-Pre-manufacture Notification:Pre-manufacture notification rules, draft--EPA
 Pre-manufacture notification requirements—EDF comments
 Pre-manufacture testing guidelines—EDF draft comments
 Box 2 Section 5- Pre-manufacture Notification:Pre-manufacture testing—EPA draft document, 1979
 Pre-manufacture notices-Conservation Foundation-Report, 1980
 Section 5 (h)(4)-EPA-Analytical reports, 1982
 Pre-manufacture notices-Office of Technology Assessment-Report, 1982
 Section 8-Inventory Reporting:Requirements-Federal Register, 1977
 Work group meeting notes, 1977
 Letter of environmentalists to Douglas Costle, 1977
 American Petroleum Institute-List of generic terms, 1977
 Natural Resources Defense Council-Comments, 1977
 Substantial risk reporting-EDF-Comments, 1977-1978
 Box 3 Section-Pre-manufacture Notification: Conservation Foundation-Report on PMNs, 1980EPA-TSCA Chemicals-in-Progress Bulletin, Vol. 1, nos. 2&4, Vol.2, nos. 1-2
 Arthur D. Little, Inc. (1978). Impact of TSCA proposed premanufacturing notification requirements. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Planning and Evaluation.
 United States. (1980). Regulatory analysis proposed premanufacture notification and review procedures: Toxic Substances Control Act, section 5. Washington, D.C.: Chemical Control
 Division, Office of Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
 United States. (1980). Economic impact analysis of proposed section 5 notice requirements. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticides
                                 and Toxic
 Substances.
 
 Box 4
 Section 12(b):Chemical Manufacturers Association-Petition to amend regulation respecting compliance,
                                 1980
 Labeling:EDF-Petition to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1978
 Conference on Labeling & Distribution in the Workplace-papers, 1978
 National Poison Center Network-information packet, n.d.
 Council on Environmental Quality:Toxic Substances Strategy Committee-Federal Register / notices, 1977
 Toxic Substances Strategy Committee-Report-Toxic Chemicals & Public Protection, 1980
 Environmental Defense Fund:Monitoring activities-summaries, 1977
 Oversight Hearings on the Toxic Substances Control Act-Testimony, 1978
 EPA-Office of Toxic Substances-Activity reports, 1982 U.S. International Trade Commission-Reports-Production of selected synthetic organic
                                 chemicals, 1977-1980 Box 5 Chemical use classification system [EPA]-MemorandaChemical use classification system-Phase II report
 Fyrol (1977)See also: TRIS
 Box 1 Flame retardants (General)-LegislationFlame retardants-(General)-Correspondence & notes
 Correspondence:Memoranda, notes, 1977
 Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1977
 Copies of correspondence-retailers, chemical companies
 Media-Press releases, clippings, 1977 Consumer Product Safety Commission:Internal memoranda on fyrol, 1977
 Public meeting on fyrol-Testimony of Robert Harris (Environmental Defense Fund), October
                                 1977
 Meeting on fyrol-Transcript excerpt, October 1977
 Data (reports & letters)-Mutagenicity, 1977 Food Additives / Saccharin (1977); 2 boxes Box 1 Food Additives: Hearings before the Senate Select Committee on Small Business-Food additives: Competitive,
                                 Regulatory & Safety Problems, Part 1, January 1977 Food additives—Journal articles, magazine articles, 1976-1977Diet & cancer—Journal articles, 1976-1977
 Box 2 Saccharin: Correspondence, 1979Media-Clippings & press releases, 1977
 Hearings before the House Subcommittee on Health & the Environment of the Committee
                                 on Interstate & Foreign Commerce-Proposed saccharin ban-Oversight, March 1977 Comments—Environmental Defense Fund on the FDA’s rules on use & reclassification,
                                 1977Testimony & statements—Non-Environmental Defense Fund, 1977
 Conference announcement-Society for Occupational & Environmental Health on saccharin
                                 policy issues, 1977
 Articles
 Women and Toxic Chemicals (1977-1980); 2 boxes Box 1 Subject Files: Breast milk—Report—Environmental Defense Fund, 1977Breast milk—Senate Committee Hearings—Testimony, June 1977
 Breast milk—Articles
 Des—Media clippings, 1979Des—Research notes, undated
 Des—Brochures—U.S. Dept of Health & Human Services
 Des—Journal articles
 Box 2 Subject Files: Hormones & cancer—Journal articlesToxins & pregnancy—Teratoggenic prevention—Journal articles
 Toxic chemicals & reproduction—papers—Friends of the Earth, 1980
 Women & the environmental movement—Articles
 Women & workplace exposure—Newsletters, 1980
 Hair Dyes—Toxicity (1977-1978); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence—Legislation, 1977Memoranda—Legal issues, 1978
 Memorandum—Toxicity of hair dye, 1978
 Memoranda—FDA—Risk assessment, 1978
 Press releases—EDF, 1978 Citizen petition for warning labels on hair dye—EDF, 1977 Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations:Environmental Defense Fund
 Statements by the Industry
 NCI
 NIOSH
 FDA
 Recommendations to the Federal Trade Commission re: hair dye risk, draft report, 1978 Food & Drug Administration:Proposed regulations re: 4MMPD in coal tar hair dyes—Comments of Cosmetic, Toiletries
                                 &
 Fragrances Association
 Review of 4MMPD National Cancer Institute Study, 1978
 Journal articles:Benzidine
 Box 2 Journal articles:Hair Dyes—General
 Hair Dyes—Epidemiology—Hair dyes & cancer
 Mutagenicity
 Teratogenicity
 Lead Acetate:Correspondence & Minutes of the FDA, Petitioners for lead acetate
 Federal register notices
 FDA’s proposal to postpone closing date for lead acetate—EDF comments
 Box 3 Lead Acetate:Documents—skin absorption
 Data:Chemicals found in hair dye
 Box 4 Journal articlesMedia—Clippings
 Consumer Product Safety Commission: Carcinogen Regulation (1978); 1 box Box 1 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund for rulemaking under Section 27 (b) and
                                 (e) of the Consumer Product Safety Act to require the identification and testing of
                                 ingredients in certain consumer products, before the Consumer Product Safety Commission Proposal for a statement of policy and procedures for classifying and regulating carcinogens,
                                 Commissioner R. David Pittle, February 1978 Memorandum-Proposed draft guidelines for a carcinogen policy-CPSC, December 1977Memorandum-Proposed carcinogen policies, 1978
 Memorandum-Proposed policy and procedures on carcinogens-CPSC, 1978
 Memorandum-Carcinogen Program resource planning options, 1978
 Report-Project to obtain information for chemical consumer products-for the CPSC,
                                 1976 Cosmetics Safety (1978-1979); 2 boxes Box 1 Correspondence—FDA Cosmetic Program budget, 1979Cosmetics legislation, lobbying coalition, 1979
 Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, July 19, 1979
 Proposed legislation
 Subject files—Cosmetics, general
 Subject files—1,4 Dioxane
 Subject files--AETT
 Subject files—Captan
 Subject files--Coumarin
 Subject files—Nitrosamines
 Subject files—Safrole
 Box 2 Walrath, J. (1977). Cancer incidence amongst cosmetologists. A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in candidacy for the degree of Doctor
                                 of Philosophy
 New Source Performance Standards (1978-1979); 1 box Box 1 Kraft Pulp Mills—Draft guideline document: Control of TRS emissions—Environmental
                                 Protection AgencyGrain Elevator Industry—Standards support and Environmental Impact Statement: Promulgated
                                 standards for performance
 Non-Metallic Mineral Processing plants emissions—Proposed Rule—Environmental Protection
                                 Agency
 Non-Metallic Mineral Processing plants—Standards support and Environmental Impact
                                 Statement
 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: Comments & Testimony (1978-1981); 2 boxes Box 1 Comments: Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s proposed rule for public participation in
                                 programs under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Safe Drinking Water
                                 Act, and the Clean Water Act, October 6, 1978. Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Environmental Protection Agency’s
                                 draft regulations of section 3010 (a) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,
                                 1978 Manufacturing Chemists Association comments on EPA’s proposed RCRA sections 3001,
                                 3002, 3003 and 3004 regulations, March 1979 California Dept of Health Services, Comments on proposed part 250 federal hazardous
                                 waste guidelines and regulations, March 1979 National Governor’s Association-Hazardous Waste Management Task Force, Subcommittee
                                 on Waste Management, comments and recommendations to the U.S. Environmental Protection
                                 Agency regarding the proposed rules for hazardous waste management 40 CFR part 250
                                 subparts A,B,D, March 1979 Comments of the National Wildlife Federation on the Environmental Protection Agency’s
                                 proposed regulations implementing section 3002 and 3004 of the Resource Conservation
                                 and Recovery Act, March 1979 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Environmental Protection Agency’s
                                 proposed regulations implementing sections 3001, 3002 and 3004 of the Resource Conservation
                                 and Recovery Act, March 1979 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s proposed consolidated permit
                                 regulations, 40 CFR sections 122, 123 and 124, 1979 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fun on the technical and economic reports concerning
                                 the proposed small generator exemption from the requirements of section 3002 of the
                                 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, February 1980 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the interim status requirements for
                                 underground injection pursuant to section 3004 of RCRA, July 1980 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund and the Natural Resources Defense Council
                                 on the interim final domestic sewage exemption from the subtitle C requirements of
                                 RCRA July 1980 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Stablex Corporation’s request for
                                 clarification and / or petition to exclude a hazardous waste and request for temporary
                                 exclusion, January 1981 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the interim standards for owners and
                                 operators of new hazardous waste land disposal facilities, as published at 46 Fed.
                                 Reg. 12414, April 1981 Supplementary comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Stablex Corporation’s
                                 request for clarification and / or petition to exclude hazardous waste and request
                                 for temporary exclusion, May, 1981 Box 2 Testimony: Testimony of the Leslie Dach on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund before the
                                 House Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations of the Committee on Interstate and
                                 Foreign Commerce on the Subject of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act., October
                                 30, 1978 Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Environmental Protection Agency’s
                                 proposed regulations implementing section 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
                                 Act, February 1979 Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s proposed regulations implementing
                                 section 3002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, February 22, 1979 Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s proposed regulations implementing
                                 section 3004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, February 22, 1979 Statement of Thomas C. Jorling before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Commerce,
                                 Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, March 27,
                                 1979 Statement by Bruce D. Davis, Executive V.P., Industrial Chemicals Group, Hooker Chemical
                                 Company on Love Canal, before the U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Oversight
                                 & Investigations of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, April 10, 1979 Testimony of Dr. Beverley Paigen on health hazards at Love Canal, presented to the
                                 House Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, March 21, 1979 Testimony of William C. Hennessey, Commissioner of Transportation and Chairman of
                                 the Governor’s Task Force on Love Canal, presented to U.S. House Subcommittee on Oversight
                                 & Investigation, March 21, 1979 Statement of Robert F. Flacke, Commissioner, NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation
                                 before the House Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, March 21, 1979 Testimony of Lois M. Gibbs, President, Love Canal Homeowners Association, before the
                                 House Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, March 21, 1979 Statement of Hon. Albert Gore, Jr. on Love Canal before the House Subcommittee on
                                 Oversight & Investigations, Committee on Interstate & Foreign Commerce, March 21,
                                 1979 Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s implementation of RCRA before
                                 the Subcommittee on Transportation & Commerce, Committee on Interstate & Foreign Commerce,
                                 March 27, 1979 Statement of Leslie Dach on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s
                                 proposed consolidated permit regulations, July 24, 1979 Statement of A. Blakeman Early on behalf of the Sierra Club on the EPA’s implementation
                                 of hazardous waste regulations, August 1979 Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund & the Sierra Club on issues relating to
                                 the creation of a post-closure liability fund, before the House Subcommittee on Transportation
                                 & Commerce, Interstate & Foreign Commerce Committee, July 1980 Testimony of Louis P. Gaeta, Assistant Executive Officer, NJ Board of Public Utilities,
                                 on New Jersey landfills, presented to the House Subcommiteee on Oversight & Investigations
                                 of the Committee on Energy & Commerce, June 9, 1981 Statement of Richard T. Dewling, Deputy Regional Adminstrator, EPA Region 2, on New
                                 Jersey landfills, before the House Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, Committee
                                 on Energy & Commerce, June 9, 1981 Testimony of Frederick E. Jahn, Administrator, Freehold Township, New Jersey, on New
                                 Jersey landfills, before the House Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, Committee
                                 on Energy & Commerce, June 9, 1981 Hazardous Waste-Surface Impoundment Assessment (1978-1981); 3 boxes Box 1 Reports: Mid-Atlantic region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources—U.S. Geological Survey
                                 South Atlantic Gulf region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological
                                 Survey
 Pacific NW-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Rio Grande region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Souris-Red-Rainy region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological
                                 Survey
 Great Basin region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Great Lakes region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Caribbean region-Summary of appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Alaska-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Arkansas-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Arizona-Surface Impoundment Assessment-AZ Dept of Health Services
 California-Summary appraisal of groundwater assessment-U.S. Geological Survey
 California-Citizens for a Better Environment-Hazardous waste management in the San
                                 Francisco Bay Area
 Upper Colorado region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources—U.S. Geological Survey
 Box 2 Lower Colorado region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological SurveyConnecticut-Surface Impoundment Assessment-CT Dept of Health Services
 Florida-Surface Impoundment Assessment-FL Dept of Environmental Regulation
 Hawaii region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources
 Illinois-Surface Impoundment Assessment-IL EPA
 Massachusetts-Surface Impoundment Assessment-Dept of Environmental Quality Engineering
 Lower Mississippi region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological
                                 Survey
 Missouri Basin region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Montana-Surface Impoundment Assessment-Environmental Protection Agency
 Box 3 North Carolina-Surface Impoundment Assessment-Dept of Natural ResourcesOhio-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Tennessee-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Texas Gulf region-Summary appraisal of groundwater resources-U.S. Geological Survey
 Virginia-Surface Impoundment Assessment
 Surface Impoundment Assessment-Guidance-EPA
 Hazardous Waste Sites—Tennessee (1978-1983); 1 box Box 1 Subject Files:Bumpass Cove—Correspondence (copies)
 Hardeman County—Reports
 Hardeman County Landfill—Reports, 1978-1979
 Hardeman County Landfill—Closure Plan, 1979
 Hardeman County Landfill—Biological Water Quality Survey, 1979
 Republic Builders Products Corporation—Correspondence (copies), 1983
 Acid Rain Subject Files (1979-1983); 2 boxes Box 1 Acid Rain—Memoranda, 1980Acid Rain—Conferences-Memoranda, 1980
 Acid Rain control—Memoranda, reports, statements, 1983
 Acid rain control-Interstate effects-Reports, articles
 Acid rain-Legal strategy-Memoranda, 1983
 NCAC meeting papers
 National Wildlife Federation statements, 1981
 Box 2 CFCs—Testimony, memoranda, 1981Acid rain in Minnesota-EPA reports
 Motor vehicle emissions of nitrogen oxides-Report of the Office of Technology Assessment,
                                 1981
 Water Quality Classification and Standards—New York State (1979); 1 box Box 1 Correspondence-Received from Tom Whyatt, Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New York State Dept of Environmental Conservation Hearings-Testimony Proposed water quality standards—Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.-Memoranda, 1980Proposed water quality standards—NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation documents
 Asbestos in Hair Dryers (1979); 2 boxes Box 1 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund for an order under s. 15 (c) and (d) of
                                 the Consumer Product Safety Act prohibiting the further sale of hair dryers containing
                                 asbestos materials, and requiring the repair and replacement of such dryers which
                                 have already been distributed in commerce; Before the Consumer Product Safety Commission,
                                 March 29, 1979 Response to the petition of the Environmental Defense Fund by the Consumer Product
                                 Safety Commission, June 1979 Media—Press releases—Environmental Defense FundMedia—Clippings
 Media—EMV & WRC-TV documents on asbestos in hair dryers
 Correspondence—Letters from the public Hearings before the House Subcommittee on Consumer Protection & Finance of the Committee
                                 on Interstate and Foreign Commerce—Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund, April
                                 1979 Johns-Manville Corporation:Presentation of Paul Kotin before the Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1977
 Report of the Johns-Manville Corporation on Hair Dryer Asbestos Emissions, April 1979
 Response of the Environmental Defense Fund to the Johns-Manville report
 Box 2 Consumer Product Safety Commission:Review of asbestos use in consumer products, April 1978
 Memoranda & correspondence, 1979
 April 2, 1979: Statement of Susan B. King, Chairman, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
                                 Commission before the Subcommittee on Consumer of the Senate Committee on Commerce,
                                 Science and Transportation CPSC Bulletin, May 1979List of hair dryers & manufacturers
 EMV Associates-Reports, 1979 National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health:Hair Dryer test results
 Final report for the testing of hair dryers for asbestos emissions, October 1979
 Review of NIOSH testing of 30 hand held & standing hair dryers for asbestos release—William
                                 Nicholson, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description (8 boxes) Hazardous Waste Sites / Superfund Sites—Michigan; 2 boxes Box 1 Media-ClippingsDioxins-Citizens petition for investigation-EDF recommendation for Government Accountability
                                 Project
 Local environmental groups-Correspondence
 Granger Landfill-Report-Peoples Action League, 1981
 Gratiot County Landfill-Reports, 1979-1982
 Box 2 Impacts of hazardous waste sites—Report—Southeast Michigan Council of GovernmentsOtt/Story Chemical Company—Reports, copies of correspondence
 Hazardous Waste Sites / Superfund Sites—New York (1979-1980); 2 boxes Box 1 Subject Files:
 Argyle, New York-notes
 Binghamton State Office Building-clippings
 Hyde Park-Bloody Run-Court documents
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Box 2 New York State Hazardous Waste Program-Progress report, December 1979New York State Dept of Environmental Conservation-Reports
 New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation
 Pollution Abatement Services site, Oswego-Work plan
 Superfund Legislation (1979-1984); 2 boxes Box 1 H.R. 7020 (Superfund) bill-SummariesSuperfund-EDF memoranda, fact sheets, 1979-1982
 National Contingency Plan-National Response Team meeting minutes, 1981
 Victims’ compensation-Memoranda, 1980
 Oversight Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on Environmental Polltuion:Testimony on behalf of the Chemicals Manufacturers Association
 Testimony on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council
 Liability provision-Memoranda (copies), 1983Site cleanup-Work group memorandum, 1984
 Public participation-Community correspondence, 1983
 Box 2 Superfund Reauthorization:Correspondence / Press release-EDF, 1984
 Before the Commerce, Transportation & Tourism Subcommittee-Energy & Commerce Committee:American Insurance Association, November 16, 1983
 Environmental Defense Fund
 Environmental Law Institute
 Chemical Manufacturers Association
 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
 Crum & Forster Insurance Companies
 Before the Commerce, Transportation and Tourism Subcommittee-Energy & Commerce Committee:Testimony—Janet S. Hathaway, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch, March 1984
 Testimony-Leslie Dach, National Audubon Society
 Testimony-National Wildlife Federation
 Dioxins (1979-1987); 4 boxes Box 1 Chronological Files:1979-Rulemaking under the Toxic Substances Control Act
 1980-Chlorinated Dioxins Work Group
 1980-Miscellaneous
 1981-Chlorinated Dioxins Work Group-EPA (?)
 1981-Dioxins in water- Canada
 1982-Hazardous waste clean up
 1982-Dioxins Work Group-EPA (?)
 1983-Miscellaneous
 1984-Petition by the EDF / NWF pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act section
                                 21
 Box 2 1984-Petition by the EDF / NWF pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act section
                                 211985- Petition by the EDF / NWF pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act section
                                 21
 Box 3 1985- Petition by the EDF / NWF pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act section
                                 211985-Petitions pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act
 1985-EPA-Status of Dioxin research
 1985-Proposed rules under the Toxic Substances Control Act
 1986-Incinerators
 1987
 Box 4 1987-Miscellaneous Hazardous Waste Sites—Memphis, Tennessee (1980-1981) Box 1 Correspondence:FOIA request
 Brother Greene (copies)
 People of Woodstock (1 item)
 Shelby County
 David Wilson & the EPA
 Media-Clippings Comments—EDF-Memphis Study Project Technical Plan Meetings-Partial transcript-EPA?-Shannon Elementary SchoolMeetings-Notes of a meeting with Bill Morris
 Meetings-EPA Metro Area Environmental Task Force
 Hearings on issues affecting Memphis before Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations:Statements, April 1980
 Box 2 Hearings on issues affecting Memphis before Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations:Transcript, April 1980
 Depositions from local citizens on health concerns, pesticides disposal, 1980 Subject Files:Center for Disease Control Health Survey
 Chlordane
 Dental Studies (journal articles)
 Box 3 Subject Files:Frayser, Memphis
 Frayser, Memphis-Studies
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Box 4 Subject Files:Hollywood Dump-Clean-up
 Hollywood Dump-EPA reports
 Memphis-Toxics data
 Memphis-EPA reports
 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Memphis-Water
 Pesticides-Reprints
 Boxes 5-7 EDF Bibliography of Environmental Data:Subject index
 Background documents
 Frayser / Steele Street area
 Hollywood Site area
 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act-Section 3004 (Financial Requirements ofOwners & Operators of Hazardous Waste Facilities (1980); 1 box
 Box 1 Environmental Protection Agency—Correspondence (2 items), 1980 International Research and Technology Corporation. (1979). Hazardous waste management issuespertinent to Section 3004 of the Resource conservation and recovery act of 1976.
 Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
 Comments & testimony, 1980 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act-Extraction Procedure (ca. 1980-1981); 1 box Box 1 Memoranda-Environmental Defense Fund, 1981 Reports & documents by author:American Society for Testing & Materials
 Electric Power Research Institute
 Environmental Protection Agency
 Water quality criteria-Federal Register, 1975, 1980Chemical Manufacturers Association-Position paper on EPA’s 1980 water quality criteria
 Notes Resource Conservation & Recovery Act-Leachates (ca. 1980-1981); 1 box Box 1 Reports arranged by author/contractor: American Petroleum Institute-Comments on hazardous waste guidelines-extraction procedure,
                                 1979Electric Power Research Institute-ASTM LEachate Test Evaluation Program, 1979
 Environmental Defense Fund-Extraction procedure-Correspondence, 1981
 Environmental Protection Agency-Leaching test methods
 Environmental Protection Agency-Leachate generation procedures, 1980
 National Bureau of Standards-Analysis & modeling of the leaching process, undated
 U.S. Dept of Commerce-Evaluation of leaching test methods, 1978
 U.S. Dept of Energy-Fossil energy waste, general sampling guideline, 1981
 U.S. Dept of Energy-Phase II Supp. Leaching Program-Leachate from Reference Fly Ash,
                                 1981
 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act-Hazardous Waste Disposal (ca. 1980-1982);2 boxes
 Box 1 Hazardous waste disposal—MediaHazardous waste disposal-Technology-Report
 Incinerator standards-Copies of correspondence, fact sheets, articles, brief, 1981
 Box 2 Industrial boilers-Memorandum, reportNational Campaign on Toxics-Media
 Operation CLEAN (organization)
 Vulcanus (Incineration vessel)-Copies of correspondence
 Hazardous Waste—New Jersey (1980-1981); 2 boxes Box 1 Media—ClippingsMedia—Newsletters
 Media—Coalition for a United Elizabeth-newsletter, testimony
 Hearing on landfill sites before the Committee on Oversight & Investigations-testimony,
                                 1981 Solid Waste Management ActRules concerning discharges of Petroleum & other hazardous substances-NJ Dept of Environmental
                                 Protection
 Bridgeport Oil & Rental Services facility-Report, correspondenceBurnt Fly Bog-Reports
 Hazardous Waste Advisory Commission-Draft report, 1979
 Lipari Landfill-Reports, clippings
 Box 2 Rollins Environmental Services Logan Plant Hazardous waste-Conferences & Meetings (1980-1982); 1 box Box 1 Waste Alert Conference-Memorandum, background papers, 1980Ohio Waste Alert Conference-Background papers, 1980
 Financial requirements for hazardous waste facilities-Meeting on re-proposed regulations,
                                 1980
 EPA-Emergency Response Work Group-Discussion papers, 1981
 Superfund Update Conference-Agenda, June 1982
 American Insurance Association Annual Meeting-Proceedings, 1982
 Hazardous Waste Sites (1980-1985); 9 boxes Box 1 Arkansas-Fort Smith-EPA correspondence (copies) 1982Arkansas-Vertac Chemical Corporation-Assessment Proposal, 1981
 Arkansas-Gramlich Site-PCB removal-Correspondence, 1982
 California-Toxic chemicals-EDF letter to Governor Brown, undatedCalifornia-McColl dump site-Clippings, correspondence (copies), 1980
 California-Stringfellow Acid Pits-Testimony of Peggy Newman
 Calfornia-Stringfellow Acid Pits-Closure-Reports
 Illinois-Bureau Co. hazardous waste dump-DocumentsIllinois-Hillside Stone Quarry-Documents
 Illinois-Sheffield Facility-Closure & post-closure plan
 Box 2 Illinois-Sheffield Facility-Closure & post-closure plan Box 3 Closed or Retained Document, Closed DescriptionIndiana-Seymour Site-Cleanup-Memoranda (copies), 1981
 Indiana-Seymour Site-Groundwater Survey-EPA, 1980
 Kansas-Arkansas City Site-Remedial action feasibility study, 1981 Kentucky-Conference on land disposal, incineration & treatment of h.w.-agenda & notes,
                                 1982 Box 4 Louisiana-Hazardous Waste Management Plan, ca. 1978Louisiana-Calcasieu Parish Coastal Management Plan, undated
 Louisiana-Calcasieu Site-Correspondence, 1982
 Louisiana-Calcasieu Site-Clippings
 Louisiana-Calcasieu Site-Site Boring Master Plan 1977-1982 (excerpts)
 Maryland-Landfills-Clippings Massachusetts-Hazardous waste sites in Woburn-Report-Tufts University, 1980 Minnesota-Fridley Plant-EDF letter to Robert Dunn, 1983Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Missouri-Dioxins-EPA documents Box 5 Missouri-Dioxins-EPA documents Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description New York-Hyde Park landfill-Court documents Ohio-Jackson County- Deep injection well-dataOklahoma-Scipio Farms-data
 Oregon-Eugene dump sites-Clippings
 Texas-Motco-Monitoring of receptors-Draft report-For the EPA, 1981 Box 6 Utah—Chevron facility—Groundwater Protection Standard, 1985 West Virginia-Fairmont Coke Works-Environmental Reconnaissance Report Box 7 Arizona-Artley Flue facility-Closure plan, 1984California-Witco Chemical Corporation-Copies of correspondence, 1983
 Colorado-Lowry Landfill-Closure plan-Correspondence, 1984
 Colorado-Lowry Landfill-Groundwater-Copies of correspondence, 1984
 Georgia-Wilkinson County Site-Copies of correspondence, legislation
 Missouri-Armco-Groundwater monitoring-Copies of correspondence, 1983
 Box 8 Missouri-Armco-Groundwater monitoring-Copies of correspondence, 1983Missouri-Armco-Closure plans, 1983
 Texas-Texas Eastman facility-Groundwater monitoring-Copies of correspondence, 1983
 Texas-Vistron/Green Lake-Closure/Post-closure plan, 1983
 Wyoming-Blake’s Pits facility-Closure plan, 1983
 Wyoming-Husky Oil Co. facility-Closure plan, 1983
 Wyoming-Little America Refining Co., 1984
 Wyoming-Texaco facilities-Copies of correspondence, 1985
 Box 9 Congressional testimony-Toxic effects of dioxin, 1982Montana-Silver Bow Creek Site-Remedial action, 1983
 New York-Hyde Park/Bloody Run
 New York-Hooker Durez Toxic Waste Problem-Report of the Durez Area Residents Assoc.
                                 Ecumenical Task Force, 1982
 Washington-International Paper Co. , Longview site-Copies of correspondence, 1985
 Superfund Program—Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites (1981); 1 box Box 1 Forms submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to section 103 (c)
                                 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation & Liability Act of 1980 (Superfund):
 California
 Colorado
 Delaware
 Illinois
 Montana
 Nebraska
 New York
 North Dakota
 South Dakota
 Texas
 Utah
 Virginia
 Wyoming
 Stablex Corporation-Hazardous Waste Treatment (1981); 3 boxes Box 1 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Stablex Corporation’s request for
                                 clarification and / or petition to exclude a hazardous waste & request for temporary
                                 inclusion, January 1981 Petition of the Stablex Corporation to exclude Stablex from being considered a hazardous
                                 waste, January 1981 Proposed hazardous waste management site in New Hampshire:Application for permit for the Merrimack Waste Management & Reclamation Center
 Media-Clippings
 Reports—Re: Merrimack Waste Management & Reclamation Center:Examination of Stablex samples, determination of extractable components using the
                                 EPA toxicity test extraction procedure
 Hyrdogeologic Impact Assessment for the Merrimack Waste Management Center
 Evaluation of environmental data
 Gulf Coast Waste Management Authority (Texas):Agreement between Stablex Corporation & the Authority
 Media-Clippings
 Box 2 Gulf Coast Waste Management Authority (Texas):Waste management center concept paper
 Application for Class I permit to store, handle & process waste
 Application for Class III permit to deposit Stablex
 Construction permit application to construct waste management center
 Report—Hydrogeologic evaluation of waste management center
 Box 3 Stablex Corporation—Hazardous waste management—Michigan:Groveland v. Jennings No. 75-132-253-Proceedings Volume XV
 Groveland v. Jennings No. 75-132-253-Proceedings Volume XVI
 Groveland v. Jennings No. 75-132-253-Proceedings Volume XVII
 Groveland v. Jennings No. 75-132-253-Proceedings Volume XVIII
 Stablex Corporation—UK Sites:Memoranda
 Media—Clippings
 Leigh Interests Ltd. Annual Report 1980
 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: Proposed Amendments on the Disposal of Containerized Liquids in Landfills (1981-1982); 1 box
 Box 1 Memoranda / Correspondence, 1981-1982Media-Press releases, 1982
 Media-Clippings, 1982
 Federal Register excerpts, 1982
 Statements-Environmental Defense Fund
 Comments-Hazardous Waste Treatment Council, 1982
 Comments-New York State Attorney General
 Superfund Program-Priority Hazardous Waste Sites (1981-1982); 5 boxes Box 1 National priority list of hazardous waste sties—Environmental Protection AgencyProposed Superfund priority list—Environmental Protection Agency
 Stringfellow Acid Pits-Correspondence (copies)
 Statements—Implementation of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
                                 Liability Act (Superfund)
 Box 2 Site cleanup methods-notes Interim priority sites-Summaries:Alabama sites
 Arizona sites
 California sites
 Colorado sites
 Connecticut sites
 Delaware sites
 Florida sites
 Box 3 Interim priority sites-Summaries:Florida sites
 Georgia site
 Kentucky sites
 Maine site
 Massachusetts sites
 Michigan site
 Missouri site
 Minnesota sites
 New Hampshire sites
 New Jersey sites
 Box 4 Interim priority sites-Summaries:New Jersey sites
 New Mexico site
 New York site
 North Carolina site
 Ohio site
 Pennsylvania site
 Rhode Island site
 South Carolina site
 South Dakota site
 Tennessee site
 Texas site
 Utah site
 Box 5 Virginia siteWashington site
 West Virginia site
 Superfund Program-National Contingency Plan (1981-1982); 1 box Box 1 Clippings, articles, 1981-1982Federal Register, 1982
 Environmental Defense Fund-Correspondence, memoranda, 1981-1982
 Press release, 1982
 EPA-National Contingency Plans (drafts), 1981
 EPA-Memorandum-Hazardous waste sites
 Hearings before Congressional committees-Statement, testimony
 Proposed revisions to the National Contingency Plan-Comments of the Chemical Manufacturers
                                 Association, 1982
 Hazardous Waste Sites / Superfund Sites—Subject Files (ca. 1982-1983); 3 boxes Box 1 Hazardous waste disposal alternativesHazardous waste disposal-ASTM Committee minutes, 1980
 Hazardous waste disposal-Site surveys
 Hazardous waste export-United Nations Environment Programme report
 Hazardous waste exposure-Statute of limitations
 Hazardous waste exposure-Health effects
 Hazardous waste siting
 Box 2 Hazardous waste sites-Cleanup-Journal articlesHazardous waste sites-design technology
 Box 3 IncinerationIncinerator standards
 Liability
 PCB destruction
 Superfund Program—Public Participation (1982-1983); 4 boxes Box 1 Environmental Protection Agency: Memoranda-Public participation, 1981-1982Guidelines for public participation under RCRA
 Interim guidelines for public participation under RCRA-Comments, 1978
 Expanded guidelines for public participation in the transportation-air quality process
 Report-Siting of hazardous waste facilities & public opposition, 1979
 Hazardous waste manual-draft
 Report-Analysis of community involvement in hazardous waste problems, 1981
 Community relations in Superfund: A handbook (draft), 1981
 Box 2 Environmental Protection Agency: Community relations in Superfund: A handbook (interim), 1983 Environmental Defense Fund: CorrespondenceRequests for assistance
 Citizens Manual for Hazardous Waste-Memoranda
 Northeast Conference on Hazardous Waste, 1981
 Hazardous waste disposal-Woburn MA (notes), 1981
 Press release-Guidelines, 1982
 Minimum guidelines for public participation for implementing CERCLA, 1982
 Conference-Superfund: Promise & reality-evaluations
 Box 3 Environmental Defense Fund:
 Southeastern Toxics Action Conference-planning notes, 1982
 Public hearing announcement re: Brown’s Lagoon, Blackwell PA, 1983
 Miscellaneous:Citizens Clearinghouse on Hazardous Waste
 Citizen newsletters
 Community relations plans
 Hazardous waste site, Kingston NH-Clippings
 Hazardous waste siting-articles
 Superfund & public participation-articles
 Box 4 United States, & ICF Incorporated. (1983). Community relations in Superfund: A handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
                                 Waste and
 Emergency Response.
 EDF-Comments on handbook Community relations plans Hazardous Waste State Regulations (1982-1985); 14 boxes Reports listed by author-subject Box 1 Arizona: Dept. of Health Services-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1984 Arkansas: Dept of Pollution Control & Ecology- Hazardous waste management code, 1984 California: California Administrative Code: Criteria for identification of hazardous wastes, 1983Draft minimum standards for management of hazardous waste, 1983
 California Department of Health Services: Hazardous Materials Management Section-Industrial waste compositions in California,
                                 1978Hazardous waste selection criteria, Memorandum, 1981
 Criteria for identification of hazardous wastes-Notice of public workshop, 1982
 Recycling hazardous waste in California, 1982
 Regulations for hazardous waste management draft volume 1, 1983
 Hazardous waste enforcement guidelines, Memorandum, 1983
 Regulations for the identification of hazardous waste, 1983
 Recycling hazardous waste, 1983
 Draft statement of reasons for proposed hazardous waste regulations, 1983
 Box 2 California: Department of Health Services: Draft regulations regarding closure / post-closure, 1983Financial responsibility regulations, 1984
 Notice of proposed changes re: hazardous waste property & border zone property, 1984
 Regulations regarding special wastes, 1984
 Criteria for identification of hazardous & extremely hazardous waste, 1985
 Author unknown (Dept of Health Services?): Informal digest & statement of reasons for financial responsibility regulations, undatedInformal digest & statement of reasons for monitoring, closure, & post-closure care
                                 of hazardous waste facilities regulations, undated
 Informal digest & statement of reasons for RCRA authorization regulations, undated
 California Environmental Protection Agency-Method for determining compatibility of
                                 hazardous waste, 1980 Hazardous Waste Management Council-Draft hazardous waste management plan, 1984 Hazardous Substances Task Force-Toxics management, undated. State Water Resources Control Board-Waste discharge requirements for non-sewerable
                                 waste disposal to land, 1980 Box 3 Colorado: Geological Survey et al.—Hazardous wastes in Colorado, 1980 Connecticut: Department of Environmental Protection—Hazardous waste management, 1983 Illinois: State of Illinois Rules and Regulations: Title 35, Subtitle G, Chapter I-Pollution
                                 Control Board State of Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 1983 Hazardous waste management legislation (bills) Committee on Transportation & Handling-Hazardous Waste Task Force reports, 1983 Dept of Energy & Natural Resources-Chlorinated solvents in sanitary landfills, 1983 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency-Multimedia toxics control strategy, 1983Illinois Environmental Protection Agency-Newsletters, 1983
 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency-Land pollution control program, 1984
 Box 4 Illinois: Illinois Legislative Investigating Commission-Hazardous waste in Illinois, 1981 Pollution Control Board—Waste hauling regulations, 1979Pollution Control Board—Land-filling of halogenated solvents, 1984
 Pollution Control Board-Liquid hazardous waste, 1984
 Indiana: Indiana Administrative Code amendments-Indiana Register, 1983 Louisiana:
 Department of Natural Resources-Hazardous waste management plan, 1983
 Maine: Roy F. Westin, Inc for the Maine Task Force on Hazardous Waste Facilities-Hazardous
                                 waste disposal in Maine, 1980 Maryland:
 Code of Maryland Regulations-Disposal of hazardous waste regulations, ca. 1983
 Box 5 Maryland:
 Code of Maryland Regulations-Disposal of hazardous waste regulations, ca. 1983
 
 Massachusetts:
 Department of Environmental Management-Hazardous waste management in Massachusetts,
                                 1982 Department of Environmental Quality Engineering—Hazardous waste regulations, 1982-1984 Box 6 Massachusetts: Department of Environmental Quality Engineering-Hazardous waste management regulations,
                                 1983 Hazardous Waste Advisory Committee—Memoranda, 1983 Michigan: Air Pollution Control Commission-Special Air Advisory Committee-Processing permit
                                 applications, 1981 Department of Natural Resources: Michigan air priority chemicals list, 1980Critical materials register, 1980
 Hazardous waste management regulations, 1981
 Groundwater contamination assessment, 1982
 Hazardous waste generation & disposal, 1982
 Processor & generator lists, 1983
 Box 7 Michigan: Department of Natural Resources: Hazardous waste disposal, 1983Michigan Priority Ranking System-Site Assessment System, 1983
 Hazardous Waste Management Act-Revisions, 1984
 Air emission standards, undated.
 Minnesota: Legislative Commission on Waste Management-Waste Management Act of 1980 Pollution Control Agency: Certification of site suitability-form, 1982Proposed rules governing facilities, 1983
 Meeting with the Environmental Defense Fund-notes, 1983
 Hazardous waste regulations, ca. 1983
 State Planning Agency-Solid & hazardous waste study, 1979 Waste Management Board-Hazardous Waste Management, 1983 Box 8 Minnesota: Waste Management Board-Security of sites, 1984Waste Management Board-Liability of site owners, 1984
 Missouri: Waste Management bill, 1982 Department of Natural Resources-Annual Report, 1982Department of Natural Resources-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1983
 Hazardous Waste Management Task Force-Report to Missouri General Assembly, 1981 Author unknown-Hazardous waste management in Missouri, undated. New Jersey: American Lung Association of New Jersey-Waste disposal, 1983 Solid waste facilities inspection bill, 1981 Department of Environmental Protection: Proposed hazardous waste regulations, 1980Classification of flue gas residue-Letter, 1981
 Non-hazardous waste regulations, 1982
 Hazardous waste regulations, undated.
 Box 9 New Jersey: Department of Environmental Protection: Proposed hazardous waste management regulations, 1982-1983Division of Water Resources-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1983
 New Jersey-Federal hazardous waste regulations, 1983
 Environmental Defense Fund hazardous waste report—Comments, undated
 Hazardous waste management-Rules & programs, 1984
 Waste oil as hazardous waste, undated
 Environmental Defense Fund / NJ DEP meeting notes, 1983
 Department of the Public Advocate—Land disposal regulations Hazardous Waste Advisory Commission—Report to Governor Byrne, 1980 New York: Department of Environmental Conservation: Industrial hazardous waste generation, 1979Hazardous waste disposal sites, 1980
 Hazardous waste collection and transport, 1981
 Solid waste guidelines, 1981
 Box 10 New York: Department of Environmental Conservation: Constructing & operating permit applications, 1981, undatedHazardous waste management plan, 1982
 Hazardous waste manifest guidance manual, 1982
 Hazardous waste regulations-Siting of facilities, 1982
 Hazardous waste regulations-solid waste management facilities, 1982
 Hazardous waste regulations-Hazardous waste manifest system recordkeeping, 1982
 Hazardous waste regulations-Identification & listing of hazardous waste, 1983
 EDF meeting with the Department (?)-meeting notes, undated
 Box 11 New York: Department of Environmental Conservation:Long Island Groundwater Program, 1983
 Comments on the hazardous waste report by the Environmental Defense Fund, 1984
 Upstate New York Groundwater Management Program, 1985
 Hazardous Waste Treatment Task Force—Final report, 1985 North Carolina: Legislation, 1983-1984 Department of Health Services-Waste Management Advisory Note, Vol. 16, 1983 Governor’s Waste Management Board-Annual Report, 1982Governor’s Waste Management Board-Waste Line, nos. 3-7, 11, 1983, 1985
 Institute for Environmental Studies-UNC-Hazardous waste management facility—Cost &
                                 benefits to local government, 1985 North Carolina Academy of Sciences-Committee on Land Disposal of Hazardous Waste-Hazardous
                                 waste management in North Carolina, 1983 Oklahoma: Department of Health-Industrial waste management regulations, 1982-1983 Box 12 Oregon: Hazardous waste management regulations, draft, 1983 Pennsylvania: Department of Environmental Resources: Hazardous waste regulations, 1981, undatedSolid wastes & hazardous wastes regulations, 1982
 General Battery Corp. request for delisting of emission control sludge, 1982
 Environmental Defense Fund-meeting notes, undated
 Rhode Island: Department of Environmental Management: Hazardous Waste Task Force-Meeting minutes, March, June 1979Proposed hazardous waste facility operating rules & regulations, 1979
 Extremely hazardous waste rules & regulations, 1981
 Hazardous waste transporter permit rules & regulations, 1981
 Manifesting rules & regulations, 1982
 Hazardous waste storage facilities permitting rules & regulations, 1982
 Hazardous waste generator rules & regulations, 1983
 Rules & regulations for permitting & operating hazardous waste storage facilities,
                                 undated
 Tennessee: Department of Public Health-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1981 Box 13 Texas: Department of Health-Solid waste regulations, ca. 1984 Virginia: State Board of Health-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1980 Washington State: Department of Ecology: Dangerous waste regulations (incomplete), 1982Classification & designation of hazardous waste, 1982
 ABASCO copper smelter, 1982
 Hazardous waste regulations, 1983
 Dangerous waste regulations, 1984
 West Virginia: Department of Natural Resources-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1983 Box 14 West Virginia: Department of Natural Resources-Hazardous waste management regulations, 1984 Wyoming: Department of Environmental Quality-Water quality, 1974, 1976, 1978-1981 Wise, D. (1980). Hazardous waste management: a survey of state laws, 1976-1980 (update).Washington: National Conference of State Legislatures.
 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act—Groundwater / Mud & Brine (1982-1984); 1 box Box 1 Groundwater files:E.I. DuPont De Neumours-Chambers Works-Memoranda, 1982
 Groundwater monitoring-IBM memorandum to the Environmental Protection Agency, 1982
 Groundwater monitoring-Cessna/ARC Avionics-Report to the Environmental Protection
                                 Agency, 1982
 RCRA floor amendment on surface impoundments-Memorandum to Ctte on Environment & Public
                                 Works, 1984
 Texas Eastman Facility-Summary of groundwater contamination-Environmental Defense
                                 Fund
 Mud & brine files:Journal articles
 Hazardous Waste Disposal-Land Disposal Regulations (1983); 1 box Box 1 Reports prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency:Clay Cap and Liner Systems-Draft final interim report 1
 Synthetic Cap and Liner Systems-Draft final interim report 2
 Expected Life of Synthetic Liner Caps
 Assessment of Technology for Constructing & Installing Cover & Bottom Liner Systems
 Hazardous Waste Sites—Pennsylvania (1983); 1 box Memoranda-EPA (copies)Media-Clippings
 Meeting announcements
 Pennsylvania Citizens Dumpsite Conference:Correspondence
 EDF proposal for a Pennsylvania meeting on Superfund
 Conference planning papers
 Conference evaluations
 Pennsylvania dumpsitesSunny Farms Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility
 Municipal & residual waste management regulations (drafts) Air Pollutants: Analysis of Emissions & Ambient Air Concentrations (1983); 1 box Box 1 Lazaro, Michael. (1983). Survey and review of anthropognic emissions, ambient concentrations,and exposure and risk levels for known or suspected carcinogenic or mutagenic
 substances. Draft manuscript.
 Hazardous Waste Sites—Massachusetts (1983); 2 boxes Box 1 Woburn Environmental Studies, Volume 1: Environmental Assessment, Stauffer Chemical
                                 Co., 1983Woburn Environmental Studies, Volume 2: Appendices, Stauffer Chemical Co., 1983
 Woburn Environmental Studies, Volume 3: Subsurface: Data/Maps/Figures, Stauffer Chemical
                                 Co., 1983
 Box 2 Ecology and Environment, Inc. Field Investigation Team. (1981). Interim report of the groundwater quality of East    and North Woburn, Massachusetts. Task report to the
                                    Environmental
 Protection Agency.
 Fred C. Hart Associates, United States, & Massachusetts. (1980). Plan for investigation of hazardouswaste problems: Woburn, Massachusetts area. Massachusetts: Dept. of Environmental
 Quality Engineering.
 Cook, D., DiNotto, R. (1981). Inventory and analysis of existing well data for East
                                 and NorthWoburn Massachusetts. Task report to the Environmental Protection Agency.
 Model Hazardous Waste State Regulatory Program (1983); 1 box Correspondence, 1983-1984Pre-proposal for developing a model program
 Draft reports--EDF:Regulated Universe of Hazardous Waste
 State Regulation of Hazardous Waste
 Datanotes
 Sub-group II.4 Toxic Chemicals Program—Public Statements / Texts SERIES 1: Comments Box 1 1973Environmental Defense Fund. (1973).  Asbestos should be listed as a toxic pollutant.
 1974Environmental Defense Fund. (1974). Comments on the environmental impact statement draft
 on the Cooperative Douglas-fir Tussock Moth Pest Management Plan for Oregon,
 Washington, and Idaho, dated December 28, 1973. Letter to T.A. Schalpfer,
 U.S.D.A. Forest Service.
 1975Environmental Defense Fund. (1975). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the
 Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed regulations for State Public
                                    Water Supervision
 Program grants and for drinking water proposed implementation of standards
                                    as published
 August 7, 1975 [40 Fed. Reg. 33224]
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1975). Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency’s
                                 proposed interim drinking water standards.
 1976Zimmerman, B.K. (1976). Comments and questions on the National Institutes of Health proposed
 guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1976). [Environmental Protection Agency’s cancer policy].
                                 Letter to Russell Train, Administrator, EPA.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1976). [Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce:
                                 Application for experimental use permit to use Mirex. Letter to the EPA.
 Harris, Robert H. (1976). Contamination of well water with chemical carcinogens from HookerChemical Company.
 1977Environmental Defense Fund. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund in response
 to the Food & Drug Administration’s proposed ban on saccharin.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1977). Comments on the proposed regulations for compiling the chemical substance inventory (section 8b) of the Toxic Substances Control
                                    Act.
 Warren, J. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on re-proposed rules for inventory report under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
 Fine, M.E. (1977). Comment on the proposed OHSA lead standards. Environmental Defense Fund. (1977). Comments on the proposed amendments to the final emission standard for vinyl chloride.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Food and Drug Administration’s regulations for the use of chemical compounds
                                    in food
 producing animals.
 1978Environmental Defense Fund. (1978). Comments on proposed manufacturing, processing,
 distribution in commerce and use bans on polychlorinated biphenyls.
 Butler, W.A. (1978). [Re-opened comment period on Mississippi Authority for the Control
                                 ofFire Ants’ proposed emergency exemption for use of ferriamicide to control
                                 fire ants.]
 Letter to Federal Register Section, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Box 2 1978Dach, L., Highland, J. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the OSHA
 “Cancer Policy” (42 Federal Register 54148).
 Jaffe, A. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the solid waste disposal facilitiesproposed criteria for classification (40 CFR 257) and the accompanying
                                    environmental
 impact statement.
 Butler, W.A. (1978). [Re: Proposed amendment and expansion of experimental use permitissued to Mississippi Authority for Control of Fire Ants for the use of
                                 ferriamicide
 bait.] Letter to Federal Register Section, Office of Pesticide Programs,
                                 EPA.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1978). Comments the preliminary drafts of the National EmissionStandard for benzene emissions from the Gasoline Distribution System and
                                    the standard
 support environmental impact statement for control of benzene from the
                                    gasoline
 marketing industry. Submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1978). [On the amended new source performance standards
                                 forsteam electric power plants and the prevention of significant deterioration
                                 program].
 Letter to Douglas M. Costle, EPA.
 Butler, W.A., Hinkle, M. (1978). Comments on EPA’s notice of rebuttable presumption againstregistration & continued registration of pesticide products containing
                                    2,4,5-T.
 43 Federal Register, 17115-57 and 43 Federal Register 24379-80.
 Letter to Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Rauch, R. (1978). [Comments on the EPA’s criteria for approval of 1979 SIP revisions].Letter to David Hawkins, EPA.
 Dach, L. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s proposed regulations implementing section 3010 (a) of the Resource Conservation
                                    &
 Recovery Act.
 Hinkle, M. (1978). Comments on EPA’s proposed guidelines for registering pesticides
                                 in the United States. 43 Federal Register 29695-29741.  Letter to the Office
                                 of
 Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Hinkle, M. (1978). Comments on EPA’s notice of determination concluding the rebuttablepresumption against registration of pesticide products containing Chlorobenzilate
 and position document no. 3. 43 Federal Register 29824-28.  Letter to
                                 the Office of
 Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Butler, W.A. (1978). [Re: Applications of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia et al.
                                 to use ferriamicide to control the imported fire ant; 43 Fed. Reg. 380854].
 Letter to Mr. James Touhey, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Dach, Leslie. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the proposedrevised NIH guidelines for recombinant DNA research;
 43 Federal Register 33041-33178.
 Johnson, A. (1978). [TRIS Indemnities bill]. Letter to Hon. Thomas P. O’Neill. Johnson, A. (1978). Veto the tris indemnities bill. Memoranda. Butler, W.A. (1978). [Re: Mississippi Authority for the Control of Fire Ants:Proposed emergency exemptions for use of ferriamicide to control fire
                                 ants].
 Letter to Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Fine, M.E. (1978). [Comments on Shell Chemical Company’s “The Cancer problem in perspective”]. Memoranda.
 1979Butler, W.A. (1979). [Mississippi Authority for the Control of Fire Ants; Proposed
 emergency exemption for use of ferriamicide to control fire ants: Additional
 comment period on photomirex data—44 Federal Register 14633]. Letter
 to Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Butler, W.A. (1979). [Mississippi Authority for the Control of Fire Ants: Proposed
                                 emergency exemption for use of ferriamicide to control fire ants; Response to additional
 information submitted since October 28, 1978.]. Letter to Office of Pesticide
 Programs, EPA.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1979). Comments on EPA draft policy and procedures for identifying, assessing and regulating substances posing a risk of cancer
                                    in ambient
 air.
 Butler, W.A. (1979). [Proposed emergency exemptions for use of ferriamicide to control
                                 fire ants in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina,
                                 South Carolina
 and Texas]. Letter to the Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1979). [Preliminary determination concerning the rebuttable presumption
                                 againstregistration & continued registration of pesticide products containing
                                 endrin]. Letter to
 the Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Rauch, R.J. (1979). [On the Consumer Product Safety Act sections 27 (a) and (e) requiring
                                 the identification and testing of ingredients in certain consumer products].
                                 Letter to Susan King,
 Chairperson, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1979).  Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’sproposed regulations implementing sections 3001, 3002, and 3004 of the Resource
 Conservation & Recovery Act.
 Warren, J.M. (1979). [Re: North Carolina citizens’ petition on the disposal of PCB
                                 contaminated soils resulting from spills…]. Letter to Harold J. Snyder, Jr., Office of Toxic
                                 Substances, EPA.
   Rauch, R.J. (1979). [Request for formal reconsideration of the Agency’s final rule
                                 revising the new source performance standards for electric utility steam generating
                                 units promulgated
 June 11, 1979]. Letter to Douglas M. Costle.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1979). [Comments on EPA’s proposed policy on regulations of biorational
                                 pesticides, 44 Federal Register, 28093-95, May 14, 1979]. Letter to the Office of
                                 Pesticide Programs,
 EPA.
 Butler, W.A., Zimmerman, K. (1979). [Rulemaking proceedings, 21 CFR Part 10, Proposed
                                 reimbursement of participants, 44 Federal Register, 23044, April 17, 1979].
                                 Letter to
 the Hearing Clerk and Alexander Grant, Food and Drug Administration.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s proposed 40 CFR section 250.13 (d) (2) (i) [extraction procedure], implementing
                                    section
 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
 Dach, L., Schultz, W. (1979). Objections of the Environmental Defense Fund and Public Citizen Health Research Group to the Food and Drug Administration’s tentative
                                    final order for
 over-the-counter anti-emetic drugs. 44 Federal Register 41064-41073, July 13, 1979.
 Silcox, M.F. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on advanced notice for proposed rulemaking, section 8 (a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1979). [40 CFR 162. [Proposed regulations for registrations of pesticides
                                 by statesto meet special local needs. 44 Federal Register, 46413-25]. Letter to
                                 Document Control
 Officer, Office of Toxic Substances, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 Highland, J.H.H. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the report to the President of the Toxic Substances Strategy Committee.
 Highland, J.H.H. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the InteragencyRegulatory Liaison Group’s draft document entitled, “Scientific bases
                                    for identification
 of potential carcinogens and estimation of risks”.
 Box 3 1979Silcox, M.F., Corrigan, M. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on EPA’s
 advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on asbestos-containing materials
                                    in
 school buildings.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the draft report of Governor Brendan Byrne’s Hazardous Waste Advisory Committee.
 Highland, J. (1979). [Re: Proposed water quality criteria 44 Fed. Reg. 15926-15981,
                                 March 15, 1979].
 Harris, R. et al. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the waiver
                                 ofnitrogen oxide for 1981-1984 diesels.
 Butler, W.A. (1979). [Proposed emergency exemption for use of ferriamicide to control
                                 fire ants in eight southern states]. Letter to the Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA.
 1980Lennett, D. et al. (1980).  Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club,
 Environmental Action, Congress Watch on the draft superfund bill.
 Lennett, D. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the technical andeconomic reports concerning the small generator exemption from the requirements
 of section 3002 of the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1980). [Public review draft of the BLM’s managing the public rangelands,
                                 November 1, 1979]. Letter to Dr. Frank Gregg, U.S. Dept of the Interior,
                                 Bureau of
 Land Management.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1980). South Dakota Dept of Agriculture application for specific exemption
                                 to the compound 1080 to control blacktail prairie dog. Letter to the Document
                                 Control Officer,
 Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, EPA.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1980). [Registration standards for the registration of pesticides; Advanced
                                 notice of proposed rulemaking. 44 Federal Register 76311-22, December 26, 1979].
                                 Letter to the
 Document Control Officer, EPA.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1980). Comments on Forest Service policy on pesticide use and criteria for use of 2-4-5-T and 2,4-D. 45 Federal Register 1650-51, January 8, 1980.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1980). Comments on selected testimony as submitted and presentedin response to the public hearings on proposed rules of the EPA to establish
                                    policy and
 procedures for identifying, assessing and regulating airborne substances
                                    posing a risk for
 cancer. 44, Federal Register 56842, October 10, 1979.
 Silcox, M.F., Lennett, D. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on EPA’s proposedrule: friable asbestos-containing materials in schools, identification
                                    and notification.
 Wagoner, J. (1980). [Comments on the role of asbestos as a hazardous agent]. Hinkle, M.K. (1980). [Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund and the National
                                 Audubon Society on the supplemental draft environmental impact statement on the
                                 Rangeland
 Grasshopper Cooperative Management Program of the U.S.D.A. Animal and
                                 Plant
 Inspection Service]. Letter to Mr. James O. Lee, Jr. Animal and Plant
                                 Inspection Service].
 Hinkle, M.K. (1980). [Comments on preliminary notice of determination concluding the
                                 rebuttablepresumption against registration of pesticide products containing lindane.
                                 45 Federal
 Register 45362-69, July 3, 1980.
 Lennett, D., Meyer, S. (1980). Comments on the Environmental Defense Fund on the financial requirements for hazardous waste management facility owners and operators
 pursuant to section 3004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
 Lennett, D. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the regulations of Class IVwells under state underground injection control programs.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1980). Comments on the Memphis study project technical study planof the Environmental Protection Agency Region IV-Atlanta.
 Lennett, D., Holland, M. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the regulation of hazardous wastes to be reused / recycled pursuant to subtitle c of RCRA.
 Baty, C.T. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on EPA’s decision not to listoven fabric dyeing and finishing wastewater treatment sludges: Amendment to subpart
                                    d
 under section 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
 Hinkle, M.K. (1980). [Comments on the DEIS for final disposal of Dept of Defense stocks
                                 of DDT].Letter to Colonel R.A. Hamblin, Office of Planning and Management, Defense
                                 Logistics
 Agency, Defense Property Disposal Service.
 Lennett, D., Highland, J.H. (1980). [Re: BEJ standards for land disposal facilities].
                                 Letter to the Docket Clerk, Docket no. 3004-BEJ, Office of Solid Waste, EPA.
 Hinkle, M. (1980). [Comments on the Global 2000 study]. Letter to Nicholas C. Yost,
                                 Director, Global 2000 Task Force, Council on Environmental Quality.
 1981Greer, L., Neuman, C., Lennett, D. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the
 proposed suspension of the hazardous waste regulations for existing storage
                                    surface
 impoundments and incinerators.
   Baty, C.T., Lennett, D. (1981). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Stablex’s Corporation’s request for clarification and / or petition to exclude a
                                    hazardous waste
 and request for temporary exclusion.
 Skinner, S., Hall, K.L. (1981). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the
                                 EPA’s interim final incinerator standards. 46 Federal Register 7666, January
                                 23, 1981.
 1982Neuman, C., Greer, L., Lennett, D. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the
 proposed revision of the National Contingency Plan.
 Wells, P.L. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on follow-up discussion paper:State action to reduce land disposal of toxic waste. Presented to the Interagency Task Force
 for Reduction of Land Disposal.
 Lennett, D., Cheek, L. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund and the Crum & Forster Insurance Companies on financial assurance requirements for corrective
                                    action.
 Submitted to the EPA.
 Silbergeld, E., Percival, R.V. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed revisions to regulations limiting the lead content of gasoline,
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, docket no. A-81-36.
 Box 4 1983Yuhnke, R.E. et al. (1983). Comments on proposed standards for radionuclides under 112 of the
 Clean Air Act. Presented before the Environmental Protection Agency.
 Greer, L., Lennett, D., Neuman, C. (1983). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the proposed listing of certain wastes containing chlorinated dioxins and
                                    dibenzofurans as
 hazardous wastes.
 Greer, L., Birnbaum, E. (1983). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s April 4, 1983 definition of solid wastes.
 1984Greer, L. (1984). [Comments on the proposed delisting of the Metropolitan Sewer District
                                 of
 Greater Cincinatti lagoons]. Letter to Miles Morse, Office of Solid Waste,
                                 EPA.
 Greer, L., Egan, S. (1984). Comments on the revised closure plan for the J.H. Baxter TieTreating Plant in Laramie, Wyoming.
 Greer, L., Egan, S. (1984). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the proposeddelisting of Union Carbide waste.
 Percival, R.V. et al. (1984). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the interim finalrule and proposed listing as hazardous under RCRA of certain waste generated
                                    during free
 radical catalyzed manufacturing processes of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons.
 No date (1978?):Environmental Defense Fund. Comments on the draft report of the Office of Technology Assessment
 “Information content of premanufacture notices”.
 Warren, J., Silcox, M.F. Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed premanufacture notification requirements and review procedures pursuant to section 5
                                    of the Toxic
 Substances Control Act.
   SERIES 2: Testimony / Speeches Boxes 1, 1a 19751975: On the public’s exposure to carcinogens through water. Statement of Robert H.
                                 Harris to the
 Subcommittee on the Environment and the Atmosphere of the House Committee on Science
                                 and Technology
 1975: On the failure of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act amendments. Statement
                                 of Robert H. Harris before Subcommittee on Water Resources of the House Committee
                                 on Public Worksand Transportation
 1976February 1976: Proposed national emission standard for vinyl chloride; Castleman,
                                 B., et al.; Statement to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 March 1976: Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund on the EPA’s State Underground
                                 Injection Control Program
 1977
 1977: Environmental Defense Fund on the need for recombinant DNA research; Hearings
                                 before theSenate Health Subcommittee of the Committee on Human Resources
 1977: The deadlines and mechanisms under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act;
                                 Statement of James T. Banks, attorney, before the the Senate Subcommittee on Environmental
                                 Pollution of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
 1977: 1972 Review of the Clean Water Act; Joseph Highland, Toxic Chemicals Program;
                                 Testimony before the Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution of the Senate Committee
                                 on Environment and Public Works
 April 1977: Ban on Tris-treated wearing apparel; Robert Harris & Robert Rauch; Statement
                                 before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer and Monetary Affairs of the Committee
                                 on Government Operations
 April 1977: Regulation of toxic chemicals by the Consumer Product Safety Commission;
 Robert Harris, Toxic Chemicals Program, EDF; Statement before the Consumer Subcommittee
 of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Service, and Transportation
 
 September 1977: Regulation of toxic chemicals by the Consumer Product Safety Commission;
                                 Robert Harris and Robert Rauch, EDF; Statement before the Subcommittee on Consumer
 Protection and Finance and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the
 House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce
 December 1977: Testimony of Walter Hang before the Poughkeepsie Common Council regarding
                                 the subject of carcinogens in drinking water and health
 19781978: New source performance standards for steam electric power plants; Robert J.
                                 Rauch, EDF; Statement before the Environmental Protection Agency
 1978: Safe Drinking Water Act; Jacqueline M. Warren, EDF; Statement before the Senate
                                 Committee on Environment and Public Works, Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution October 1978: EPA’s Final Rule for Special Packaging of Pesticides; Maureen Hinkle,
                                 Environmental Defense Fund; Statement on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund Johnson, A. (1978, August). Behind the hype on products liability. Presented to the American Bar Association [Conference?].
 1978: Health hazards of nitrite and N-Nitroso compounds; Anita Johnson, Environmental
                                 Defense Fund; Testimony before the Senate Agriculture Committee 1978: Toxic Substances Control Act Oversight Hearings; Jacqueline M. Warren, Environmental
                                 Defense Fund; Testimony before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works,Subcommittee
                                 on Environmental Pollution Johnson, A. (1978, September). Recent developments on disclosure of safety data by federalregulatory agencies. Presented to the Federal Bar Association.
 1978: Food Safety and Nutrition Amendments of 1978; Testimony of Anita Johnson, Environmental
                                 Defense Fund Johnson, A. 19791979: Hazards posed by use of asbestos liners in hand-held hair dryers; Joseph Highland,
                                 Toxic Chemicals Program, Environmental Defense Fund; Testimony before the Subcommittee
                                 on Consumer Protection and Finance of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce
                                 of the U.S. House of Representatives
 
 1979: PCBs; Jacqueline M. Warren, Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund; Testimony
                                 before the
 Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, House Committee on Interstate and Foreign
                                 Commerce
 Harris, Stephanie. (1979, November). Organochlorine contamination of breast milk.Presented at the American Public Health Association Conference.
 1979: Health hazards posed by asbestos spray materials in schools; Leslie Dach, Environmental
                                 Defense Fund; Testimony before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational
                                 Education 1979: Proposed legislation dealing with asbestos hazards in public schools; Testimony
                                 of the Environmental Defense Fund before the Subcommittee on Elementary and Secondary
                                 Education of the Committee on Education and Labor of the U.S. House of Representatives
                                 
 1979: Proposed consolidated permit regulations [40 CFR §122, 123, 124; 44 Fed. Reg.
                                 34244 et seq., June 14, 1979]; Leslie Dach, Environmental Defense Fund; Statement
                                 before the Environmental Protection Agency
 1979: Cosmetic safety legislation; Leslie Dach, Environmental Defense Fund; Testimony
                                 before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on
                                 Interstate and Foreign Commerce on the need for cosmetic safety legislation 
 1979: Toxic substances; David Lennett, Environmental Defense Fund; Testimony before
                                 the
 Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation, Standing Committee on Health, Subcommittee
                                 on Toxic and Hazardous Substances of the New York State Assembly
 
 1980
 1980: Proposed revisions to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan; Robert J.
                                 Rauch, Environmental Defense Fund; Statement before the Allegheny County Board of
                                 Commissioners
 1980: Toxic chemical problem in Memphis, TN; Joseph Highland, Toxic Chemicals Program,
                                 Environmental Defense Fund; Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
                                 of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce 1980: Issues related to the creature of a post-closure liability fund; Statement on
                                 behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund & Sierra Club before the Subcommittee on
                                 Transportation and Commerce of the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee 1980: Hearing conducted by Harold Ford on SCA Chemical Services Inc.’s proposed Memphis
                                 chemical waste treatment and recovery facility; Testimony of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund
 1981
 1981: Legislation to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Consumer Product
                                 SafetyCommission; Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund at hearings before the
                                 Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the House of Representatives
 1981: review of the post-closure provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response.
                                 Compensation and Liability Act of 1980; Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund
                                 before the  House Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation and Tourism 
 1981: EPA’s budget proposal for fiscal year 1982; Statement of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund before the House Appropriations Task Force
 1981: Joseph Highland on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund on tris-treated
                                 sleepwear, before the Subcommittee on Separation of Power of the Senate Judiciary
                                 Committee 1981: Statement of Joseph Highland and David Lennett on the budget for Superfund,
                                 before the Subcommittee on HUD-Independent Agencies of the House Appropriations Committee March 5, 1981: Testimony of Joseph H. Highland on behalf of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund on legislation to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Consumer
                                 Product Safety Commission before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of
                                 the House of Representatives April 10, 1981: Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed measures to
                                 protect consumers from exposure to asbestos, before the Standing Committee on Consumer
                                 Affairs and Protection, State Assembly of New York Box 2 19821982: Regulation of fuel and fuel additives; Ellen K. Silbergeld, Environmental Defense
                                 Fund, before the Environmental Protection Agency
 1982: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); Khristine L. Hall, Environmental
                                 Defense Fund; Testimony before the Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution of the
                                 Environment andPublic Works, U.S. Senate 1982: Proposals to relax  or rescind regulations limiting the lead content of gasoline;
                                 Robert V. Percival; Testimony before Environmental Protection Agency 1982:  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental
                                 Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund).Testimony of Khristine L. Hall,
                                 Environmental Defense Fund 1982: Superfund; Statement of Khristine L. Hall and Ellen K. Silbergeld before the
                                 Environmental Pollution Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public
                                 Works 1982: Hazard communication standard; Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund before
                                 the Occupational Safety and Health Administration  
 1982: Tris Indemnities bills; Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund before the
                                 House Judiciary Committee
 
 1983
 1983: Testimony of Khristine L. Hall and Ellen K. Sibergeld before the Subcommittee
                                 on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight, Senate Environment and Public Works
                                 Committee
 SERIES 3: Writings by Program Staff Boxes 1, 1a 1971-1979Puleston, D. (1971). Defending the environment: A case history. [Upton, N.Y.]: Brookhaven
 National Laboratory.
 Harris, R. H., Vermeij, E., & Epstein, S. S. (1974). The implications of cancer-causing substances inMississippi River Water. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Defense Fund.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1974). A summary and evaluation of selected state drinking watersystems. Washington, D.C.: The Fund.
 Environmental Defense Fund, & Moskowitz, P. (1977). Troubled waters: Toxic chemicals in theHudson River. New York: Environmental Defense Fund and the New York Public Interest
 Research Group.
 Johnson, A. Is our food additives law ok? Manuscript. Hinkle, M. (1979). [Re: The Nashville Banner’s position on the ban on DDT]. Letter
                                 to the Editor. UndatedWurster, C.F., Habicht, E.R. (ca. 1972). Cancer-causing agents in the human environment: To win
 the war on cancer, we must fight against cancer-causing agents in our
                                    air, food, water.
 Manuscript.
 Highland, J. (undated). Corporate cancer: A new name for an old disease. Manuscript. Highland, J. (undated). PCBs. Manuscript. 1980-1982Harris, R. (1980). The role of citizens in responding to hazardous waste dump sites.
 Mansucript.
 Lennett, D. (1980). Hazardous wastes: A brief overview of an immense problem.Manuscript.
 Silcox, M.F. (1980). The public’s interest in labeling. Manuscript. Harris, S. G., & Highland, J. H. (1981). Birthright denied: The risks and benefits of breast-feeding. [Stony Brook, N.Y.]: Environmental Defense Fund. 3rd edition.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1981). Legal and policy analysis by the Environmental Defense Fundin response to efforts to restrict the relief available in enforcement actions brought
                                    pursuant
 to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
 (Superfund). Manuscript.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (ca. 1981). Controlling the disposal of hazardous waste. Manuscript. Silcox, M.F., Highland, J. (1981). Scientific history of victim compensation. Draft manuscript. Silcox, M.F., Highland, J.H. (1981). A small price to pay for life. [Consumer product hazards].Manuscript.
 Silbergeld, E.K., Anderson, S.M. (1982). Artificial food colors and childhood behavior
                                 disorders. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Science. 58, 275-295.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1982). Administrative process for the land disposal ban.
                                 Memorandum to the Interagency Task Force, Toxic Waste Assessment Program.
 Rauch, R. (n.d.). Challenging sulfur dioxide SIP relaxations: Guidelines for citizen
                                 action.Manuscript.
 Box 2 1982, 1984Silbergeld, E.K. (1982). Effects of lead on reproduction: Review of experimental studies.
 Manuscript.
 Silbergeld, E.K. (1982). Indirectly acting neurotoxins. Manuscript. Greer, L.E. (1984). Definition of hazardous waste. Manuscript. Lennett, D., Greer, L. (1984). State regulation of hazardous waste: A summary and analysis.Manuscript.
 UndatedEnvironmental Defense Fund. [Manual for communities near hazardous waste sites].
 Draft manuscript.
 Wagoner. J.K. (undated). Uranium: The United States experience, a lesson in history.Manuscript.
 Sub-group III Water Resources/ Wetlands Program Sub-group III.1 Water Resources / Wetlands Program—Staff Files SERIES 1: Edward Thompson, Jr. Box 1 Chronological correspondence-Sent & received, 1976-1979 EDF documents:Bylaws & certificate of incorporation
 Litigation Review Committee-Memoranda, 1976, 1978
 Selected case summaries, 1976
 Prospectus, 1978-1979
 Fundraising-Prospectus of the Coastal Resources Program, undated
 Fundraising-Correspondence, 1976
 Staff memoranda, 1977-1978
 Intern projects, 1978
 Programs-Memoranda, 1976-1978
 Water Program-Memoranda
 Water Program-East Setauket NY office, 1976-1977
 Box 1a Water Program-East Setauket NY office, 1976-1977 Speeches:Correspondence, 1977
 Remarks prepared for the National Wetlands Symposium, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 1978
 Wetlands Legislation:Wetlands legislation inventory-University of Miami, 1974
 H.R. 4261-Mosquito Control Act of 1977
 H.R. 6286-Natural Diversity Bill-Statements, 1977
 Alexandra Waterfront legislation-Correspondence, 1972 Trout Unlimited-Copies of correspondence, re: Water projects, 1972-1978Trout Unlimited-Copy of bylaws
 The Wilderness Society-Copies of correspondence, re: wild & scenic rivers
 The Wilderness Society-Copy of certificate of incorporation
 Box 2 Subject Files:Assateague Island—Management plan, clippings, correspondence, ca. 1978
 California drought
 Channelization
 Coastal Alliance—Meeting papers, 1979
 Coastal Coalition—Issue papers, correspondence, 1978
 Box 3 Dredging Dredging-Virginia-Environmental impact statements
 Highway bridge-Georgia
 Land & Water Task Force-United States Department of Agriculture
 Pro Bono planning
 Riverside Marine Terminal, Ohio—Correspondence, 1978
 Box 4 Water quality, Potomac River—pleadings, correspondence, ca. 1977Wetlands-International Wetlands Treaty
 Wetlands-Wetlands Protection: A Guide for Local Governments(draft)-Environmental Law Institute
 Box 5 Soil and Water Resources Conservation Act: United States. (1979). Soil and Water Resources Conservation Act: 1980 appraisal : review draft. [Washington]: Dept. of Agriculture.
 United States. (1980). Soil and water resources conservation act: Program report andenvironmental impact statement : 1980 review draft. [Washington]: U.S. Dept. of
 Agriculture.
 United States. (1980). Summary of appraisal, parts I and II, and program report: Soil and WaterResources Conservation Act. [Washington, D.C.?]: The Dept.
 SERIES 2: Langdon Warner [Science Monitor] Box 1 Subject Files, 1978: Delaware River-Toxics & Drinking WaterDelaware River Basin water pricing scheme-Memoranda
 Seventh Water Resources Program of the Delaware River Basin Commission, 1970
 Francis E. Walter Project-C/B study, citizen letters
 Merrill Creek Dam
 New Jersey water supply master plan-Correspondence
 Pennsylvania State Water Plan-Comments
 Point Pleasant water diversion-Clippings, fact sheets
 Sub-group III.2 Water Resources / Wetlands Program—Legal Files SERIES 1: Litigation & Hearings Files Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge (1971-1976); 1 box Box 1 On vehicular access privileges Correspondence, 1971-1980Correspondence (copies), 1972-1980
 Memoranda, 1973-1980
 Media-Clippings
 Coupland et al. v. Morton Civil action no. 145 Complaint, 1973 National Audubon Society v. Kleppe  Complaint, 1976 Cache River Channelization Project (1971-1972); 1 boxSee also: Record Group 2 New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence / Memoranda, 1971Pleadings, 1971-1972
 Opinion, 1972
 United States. (1972). Cache River basin feature, Mississippi River and tributaries project, Arkansas: Final environmental statement. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief of
 Engineers, Dept. of the Army.
 Water Project Planning-Water Resources Council Regulations; 1 box
 Box 1
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Water Resources Council no. 1005-72(U.S. District Ct., D.C.)
 Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition to motion to dismiss, 1972Exhibits-Answers of the Water Resources Council to interrogatories
 Tanker Construction (1972-1974); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence-EDF, 1972Correspondence-Agencies, 1972-1973
 Correspondence-Naval vessels, 1973
 Memoranda-EDF, 1972Memoranda-Maritime Administration Title XI, 1973
 Media-clippings EDF et al. v. Peterson et al. Civil action 2164-72(U.S. District Ct, District of Columbia)
 Pleadings:Complaint for declaratory & injunctive relief, October 1972
 Motion for preliminary injunction, October 1972
 Affidavits, November 1972
 Re: Motion for preliminary injunction, December 1972
 Box 2 Pleadings:Re: Motion for preliminary injunction, December 1972
 Stipulation, January 1973
 Stipulation-Economic viability analysis of contract vessels, March 1973
 Economic viability analysis-Comments-EDF, March 1973
 Stipulation-Economic viability analysis of contract vessels, April 1973
 Box 3 Pleadings, 1974 Environmental Impact:Environmental impact statement-Maritime Administration Construction Program, 1973
 Memoranda, 1973
 Docket A-75-Final order & opinion of the Maritime Subsidy Board, re: environmental
                                 review of construction program, 1973
 Report:Deepwater ports—Economics, 1972
 Box 4 Report-Maritime Subsidy Board/Maritime Administration—Economic Viability Analysis
                                 of the contract vessels pursuant to stipulation in EDF v. Peterson et al. Civil action no.
                                 2164-72
 Federal Water Project—Discount Rate (1972-1973); 1 box Box 1 EDF v. Water Resources Council no. 1005-72 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Correspondence, 1973Complaint for declaratory & injunctive relief, 1972
 Pleadings (drafts), 1972
 Blue Plains Sewage Treatment Plant (1972-1977); 5 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1972, 1974Correspondence—Federal & State agencies (copies)
 Memoranda, 1975-1976
 Media—Clippings, 1971-1977 Notes, undated. Potomac Environment Conference—Statement of Marian Agnew, Northern Virginia Conservation
                                 Council, 1971 Meeting among the parties, 1976 NPDES discharge permit, 1974 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit hearings before the Environmental
                                    Protection Agency Docket no. DC-AH-0001 Pleadings, 1975-1976 Box 2 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit hearings before the Environmental
                                    Protection Agency Docket no. DC-AH-0001 Testimony-David H. ElliottTestimony-Robert H. Harris
 Testimony-Norbert A. Jaworski
 Testimony—League of Women Voters—Donald Pritchard
 Transcript of proceedings (incomplete), April 27-28, 1976 Box 3 Transcript of testimony—EDF—Robert H. Harris, April 29, 1976Transcript of testimony—Fredrick Ericsson, April 30, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Alan F. Cassell, April 30, 1976
 Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, 1978 Request for adjudicatory hearing, 1979 Box 4 Request for adjudicatory hearing, 1979 Subject files:Blue Plains—Agreements
 Blue Plains—Sewage flows
 Blue Plains—Performance
 Blue Plains—Charlotte P. Garnett critique
 De-nitrification
 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Section 208 planning
 Metro Washington Council of Governments/EPA meeting notes
 NPDES permit—EPA correspondence
 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission—Memoranda
  Box 5 Documents:Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, 1971
 Conferences
 Agreements
 Reports
 Meeting minutes
 Memoranda
 Marco Island Development—Florida (1973-1980); 1 boxSee also: Record Group 2 New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence & memoranda, 1974-1976 Application of the Deltona Corporation for dredge and fill permit nos. 73G-0496-0498 Brief—Environmental Defense Fund, undated Application for certification before the Florida Pollution Control Board Brief—Applicant Deltona Corporation Deltona Corporation v. United States No. 370-76 (U.S. Court of Claims) Pleadings, March-May 1980 St. Phillips Island, South Carolina—Development (1974-1979); 5 boxes Box 1 Chronology Memoranda, 1974-1976Memoranda-Legal issues
 Chronological correspondence—1974:Environmental Defense Fund & local organizations
 Environmental Defense Fund
 To the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (copies)
 To the U.S. Coast Guard, 7th District (copies)
   Chronological correspondence—1975:Environmental Defense Fund & local organizations
 To the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (copies)
 To the U.S. Coast Guard, 7th District (copies)
 Box 2 Chronological correspondence—1975:Miscellaneous
 Chronological correspondence—1976:Environmental Defense Fund & local organizations
 Environmental Defense Fund
 Chronological correspondence—1977:Environmental Defense Fund & local organizations
 Environmental Defense Fund
 To the U.S. Coast Guard, 7th District (copies)
 Chronological correspondence—1978:Environmental Defense Fund
 Box 3 Chronological correspondence, 1974-1975Chronological correspondence, 1978-1979
 Hearing on permit application to construct a bridge, February 1, 1978 Box 4 Chronological correspondence—1978:Environmental Defense Fund & local organizations
 Environmental Defense Fund
 Chronological correspondence—1979:Environmental Defense Fund
 Miscellaneous
 Media—Clippings Turner, R.S. et al. (1977). Alternative futures for St. Phillips Island.Thesis, 1977. Partially funded by the Environmental Defense Fund.
 Environmental Defense Fund—Bibliography of Barrier Islands Literature, 1977 Environmental Defense Fund—Remarks of Edward Thompson, Jr. at public hearing, 1978 Environmental Defense Fund—Comments—Draft rules and regulations of the South Carolina
                                 Coastal Council, 1978 Environmental Defense Fund—Comments—Permit application, n.d. Environmental Impact Statements:Developer’s impact statement, 1973
 Box 5 Environmental Impact Statements:Comments on draft impact statement—Environmental Defense Fund, 1974
 Study-Social & economic effects—U.S. Coast Guard, 1977
 Revised draft—U.S. Coast Guard, 1977
 Comments on revised draft—Environmental Defense Fund, 1977
 Report—Ecosystem inventory / impact of development—For 7th District, U.S. Coast Guard,
                                 n.d. Photographs: Title: [St. Phillips Island area]Creators: Tom Burbage, Roy Attaway, unknown
 Description: Depictions of coastline, birds of prey, landscape
 Date: Unknown
 Size: 3 ½ x 5, 5x7, 8x 10
 Slides: Title: [St. Phillips site]Creators: Unknown
 Description: Maps of vegetation, soils, hydrology, master plan, site plan, et al.
 Date: Unknown
 Davis Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Project, W. Virginia (1974-1980); 1 box Box 1 Federal Power Commission Project no. 2709-Application for construction license Correspondence, 1974, 1979Memoranda, 1974, 1980
 Pleadings, 1974, 1976Initial decision of the Administrative Law Judge, 1976
 Petitions for re-hearing, 1977
   Monongahela Power Co. et al. v. Alexander et al. Civil action no. 78-1712(U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.)
 Memorandum of points and authorities by intervening conservation organizations in
                                 opposition to Plaintiffs’ joint motion for summary judgment and in support of defendants’
                                 cross-motion for summary judgment, 1980 Garrison Diversion (1976-1978); 2 boxes Box 1 Correspondence-agencies, 1976Memoranda, 1976
 Media Complaint Box 2 Hearings before the Select Committee on Small Business-Will the Family Farm Survive
                                 in America?Part 1, July 1975
 Reports:U.S. Department of the Interior-Environmental statement, 1973
 U.S. Department of the Interior-Final environmental statement-Review-Institute of
                                 Ecology
 U.S. Department of the Interior-Supp. environmental statement, 1978
 U.S. Department of the Interior-Fish & wildlife resources
 U.S. Department of the Interior-Report on recommended plan, 1978
 Tocks Island Dam (1976-1978); 7 boxesSee also: Sub-group III.3 Series 2 Delaware River Basin Comprehensive Study
 Box 1 Complaint, Delaware River Basin Commission et al. v. Beal, civil action (draft), n.d.De-authorization of Tocks Island-Correspondence, 1976
 De-authorization of Tocks Island (S.3106)-public hearing statements, 1976
 Delaware River Basin Commission canoe trip-memoranda, 1978
 Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area-correspondence (copies), 1976-1978
 Energy-Report
 Box 2 Environmental Impact Statement-Dept of the Army, n.d.Environmental Study-prepared for the Delaware River Basin Commission, 1970
 Box 3 Schindler, G.E., Sinden, F.W. (1973). Tocks Island Dam: A preliminary reviewPhiladelphia: Save the Delaware Coalition
 Flood ControlNew Jersey-statements on Tocks Island project
 Salinity Control-Delaware River Basin Commission
 Sopper, W.E., Kardos, L.T. (1972). Potential use of spray irrigation in the Tocks IslandArea. Prepared for the Delaware River Basin Commission.
 Box 4 Tocks Island alternatives: M. Disko Associates. (1973). New Jersey water supply: alternatives to Tocks IslandReservoir. West Orange New Jersey: Author.
 Prepared for the Environmental Defense Fund.
 URS / Madigan-Praegar, Conklin & Rossant. (1975). A comprehensive study of the Tocks IslandLake Project & Alternatives. New York: Authors.
 Box 5 Tocks Island alternatives: URS / Madigan-Praegar, Conklin & Rossant. (1975). A comprehensive study of the Tocks IslandLake Project & Alternatives. New York: Authors.
 Box 6 Water management—Delaware River, 1978-1979Wild & Scenic River Act, 1978
 Box 7 Statements before CongressPhotographs
 Tennessee / Tombigbee Waterway (1976-1981); 10 boxesSee also: Record Group 2, New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Memoranda, 1976Media-Clippings, 1976-1977
 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1974). Final environmental statement: Tombigbee River and tributaries-Luxapalila Creek segment, Alabama and Mississippi.
 Mobile: Author.
 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (no date). First supplemental environmental report,
                                 continuing environmental studies. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway,
 Alabama and Mississippi. Volume II, appendix A.
 Mobile: Author.
 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Hoffman et al. civil no. 76-2204(U.S. District Ct., Dist. of Columbia)
 Complaint, 1976 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Hoffman et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Pleadings, 1976-1977Pleadings-Discovery, 1977-1978
 Box 2 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Pleadings-Discovery, 1978Pleadings-Federal defendants’ motion for summary judgment, 1978
 Box 3 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Pleadings-Re: motion for summary judgment, 1978Affidavits, December 1978
 Pleadings-Proposed findings of fact, 1979
 Memorandum of decision, March 1979 Pleadings-Motion for injunction pending appeal, June 1979 Box 4 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Pleadings, 1979-1980Pleadings-Motion for summary judgment, 1980
 Box 5 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Pleadings-Motion for summary judgment, 1980 Memorandum opinion & order, 1980 Affidavits Exhibits (un-marked-Defendants’?) Box 6 Pleadings-Defendants’ motion for judgment on pleadings or summary judgmentDefendant’s appendix
 Exhibits—Defendants
 Box 7 Exhibits-Defendants #18-22 Box 8 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. EC 77-53-K(U.S. Dist. Ct., No. Dist, MS)
 Exhibits (un-marked-Defendants’?)Exhibits-Federal defendants
 Petition for writ of mandamus to the Hon. William C. Keay(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 5th Ciruit)
 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. 79-2684(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 5th Circuit)
 Pleadings, July-August 1979 Box 9 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. 79-2684(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 5th Circuit)
 Pleadings, September 1979-1980Appellees’ appendix
 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. 80-3915(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 5th Circuit)
 Pleadings-Motion for injunction, 1981 Box 10 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Alexander et al. No. 79-2684(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 5th Circuit)
 Pleadings, 1981 Record excerpts Appendix of the appellants Colorado River—Salinity Standards (1977-1979); 4 boxes Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle No. 77-1436 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.) Pleadings:Complaint / Motions to intervene, August 1977
 Motions to intervene, October-November 1977
 Re: Motion for change of venue, November 1977
 Re: Motions to intervene, November-December 1977
 Defendant’s answer to complaint, November 1977
 Re: Motions to intervene, January 1978
 Discovery, February 1978
 Re: Motions for judgment / Discovery, April, June 1978
 Re: Motion for judgment on pleadings, June 1978
 Box 2 Pleadings:Discovery, July-December 1978
 Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, January 1979
 Box 3 Pleadings:Re: Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, July 1979
 Memorandum opinion and order on cross-motions for summary judgment, September 1979
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle No. 78-1471 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Circuit) Re: Appeal for summary reversal on motions to intervene, June-July 1978 Box 4 Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle No. 79-2432 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Circuit) Notice of appeal (Civil no. 77-1436), December 1979 Pleadings:Brief-State Appellees, 1980
 Brief-Appellant Environmental Defense Fund, 1980
 Opinion, 1981
 Colorado River Basin—Water Resources Development (1978-1981); 4 boxes Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Higginson Civil no. 78-1135(U.S. District Ct., Dist of Columbia)
 Complaint, June 1978Pleadings, October-February, 1978
 Box 2 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Higginson Civil no. 78-1135(U.S. District Ct., Dist of Columbia)
 Pleadings, July-October 1979 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Higginson No. 80-1123 et al.(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, District of Columbia)
 Pleadings-Brief of the appellant, June 1980Pleadings-Brief of appellees Utah Power & Light, September 1980
 Pleadings-Joint brief for cross appellant states: Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Wyoming
 Box 3 Pleadings, 1979 Box 4 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Higginson No. 80-1123 et al.(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, District of Columbia)
 Pleadings-Briefs:Federal appellees, November 1980
 Reply brief for cross appellant states: Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Wyoming
 Reply brief of appellees Utah Power & Light
 Brief for appellees Utah Power & Light
 Dredge and Fill permit-Disposal of fill material (1982-1983); 1 box Box 1 National Wildlife Federation v. Marsh no. 82-2632 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.) Correspondence, 1982-1983, 1985Copies of correspondence [Dept of the Army]
 Pleadings & affidavits
 Notes
 SERIES 2: Background Documents Blue Plains Sewage Treatment Plant—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System;6 boxes
 Box 1 American Clean Water Association:Founding meeting papers, 1978
 American Society of Civil Engineers:National meeting papers, 1973
 Chlorine—Subject file Committee on the District of Columbia, Subcommittee on Bicentennial, Environment &
                                 International Community:Hearing testimony, 1976
 Conference on Pollution of Potomac River:Testimony, n.d.
 Council on Environmental Quality:Report—Urban water pollution loads, n.d.
 D.C. Environmental Services:Data—Water quality
 Environmental Protection Agency:Correspondence, 1974-1978
 Reports—Carcinogens, 1975
 Reports—Construction grants
 Reports—Drinking water survey
 Box 2 Environmental Protection Agency:Documents—Dickerson waste treatment facility
 Documents—sludge management
 Data—Water quality
 International Conference on Water Quality Improvement Alternatives:Paper—Viruses in sludge management, n.d.
 Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin:Report—Potomac Estuary Monitoring Program, 1976
 Lake Tahoe—Subject file Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments:Correspondence—Waste load allocation, 1977
 Report—Federal project review policy & procedure, 1977
 Report—Waste load allocation, 1977
 Box 3 Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments:Report—Water quality standards (draft), 1976
 Report—National Pollutant Discharges Elimination System, 1977
 Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments—208 Planning:Memoranda to the Water Resources Planning Board, 1977
 Report—Project control plan, 1977
 Box 4 Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments—Water Resources Planning Board:Memoranda—Water shortage emergency plan, 1976
 Memoranda—Conference on Potomac action strategy, 1977
 Policy statement, 1977
 Report—Waste load allocation
 Report—Water Resources Citizen Advisory Committee, 1977
 Comments--Charlotte Gannett on WRPB staff document on chlorophyll a
 Montgomery County, Maryland:Report—Fish inventory, 1975
 Documents—Pollution studies, 1977
 Montgomery Environmental Coalition:Statements, 1975-1976
 Documents—Seneca NPDES file,
 Pleadings--MEC v. WSSC et al. No. 78-1730
 Box 5 Muskegon Water Treatment Plant—Subject File National Commission on Water Quality:Hearing statements, 1976
 Natural Resources Defense Council:Report—Water pollution control alternatives, 1973
 Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory:Report—Potomac analysis, n.d.
 U.S. Department of the Army:Reports—Water supply
 Data—Estuary baseline study
 Box 6 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission:Correspondence—Viruses, 1973
 Statement—Critique of WSSC—Edward Friend
 Report—Sewerage study, 1971
 Report—Water quality standards
 Report—Carcinogens
 Data—Water quality
 Data:Blue Plains
 Montgomery County STP site survey
 Water quality
 Sub-group III.3 Water Resources / Wetlands Program—Project Files SERIES 1: Committees & Meetings [Reserved] SERIES 2: Project Files St. George’s Harbor, Piney Point, MD—Dredge and fill permit (1971-1972); 1 box Box 1 Correspondence—EDF / Dept of the Army, 1971-1972Reports—Erik Jansson, Potomac River Association
 Background documents-Notes, court brief, permit
 Captain’s Cove Development—Virginia (1972-1979); 2 boxes Box 1 Correspondence-To the Corps of Engineers, 1974-1976Correspondence-Applicants, 1975
 Correspondence-Corps of Engineers-EDF, 1976-1977
 Media Statements to the Corps of Engineers-Re: Dredge & fill permit application File—Media-ClippingsFile—Proposed & existing development construction details—Prince William Engineering
                                 Co.
 File—Draft environmental statement-U.S. Corps of Engineers, 1974
 File—Filings, 1972
 First Charter Land Corporation v. Howard Civil no. 78-14-N-Complaint Comments-Notice of proposed consent decree—Environmental Defense Fund, 1979 Box 2 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description Deepwater Ports (1973-1975); 1 box Box 1 Chronological file-On proposed legislation for construction of facilities, 1973 United States. (1973). Draft environmental impact statement: deepwater ports: To accompanylegislation to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to regulate the construction
                                    and
 operation of deepwater port facilities. [Washington]: Dept. of the Interior.
 Proposed regulations by the U.S. Coast Guard-Comments/Testimony, 1975 Water Quality-Pittsburg (1974-1975); 1 box Box 1 Media-Clippings, 1974 Garvin, John P. (1975). A 1974 study of water quality in twenty-four municipal water
                                 utilities in Allegheny County, PA. University of Pittsburg, School of Public Health.
 Long Island Water (1974-1977); 2 boxesSee also: Record Group 2, New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1975 Subject Files:Groundwater—Geraghty & Miller (Consulting firm)—Qualifications statement, 1975
 Groundwater—Reports
 Sewage treatment facilities—EDF v. Costle—Decision, 1977
 Wastewater—Reports
 Box 2 Wastewater—ReportsWastewater—EPA policy on re-use, 1975
 Wastewater—Municipal Wastewater Re-use Research Needs Workshop, Denver, 1975
 Water Quality—Suffolk County—Memoranda, 1976
 Water Quality—Reports
 Subject Files: Coastal Zone Management / Wetlands (1975-1979); 1 box Box 1 Coastal Zone Management:General information
 Chesapeake Bay / Port of Baltimore-Report, 1977
 Coastal Zone Management Act-American Petroleum Institute v. Knecht
 Coastal Zone Management Program-State-Dept of Commerce reports
 Coastal Management: Options for the ‘80s-Conference Report
 Slaughter Beach
 Soil erosion control
 West Galveston Bay
 Wetlands:Alsea / Siletz wetlands reviews
 Interstate Conference on Water Pollution-Questionnaire
 Slaughter Beach
 Wetlands drainage
 Wetlands preservation
 Ohio River Basin (1975, 1978) Removed for cataloging: Ohio River Basin Commission. (1975). Monongahela River Basin water and relatedland resources study report and environmental impact statement.
 Cincinnati: Author.
 Indiana University, Ohio State University, Purdue University. (1977). Ohio River Basinenergy study: Preliminary technology assessment report. Phase I. Volume
                                    II-A, part 1.
 Washington: Office of Research & Development, EPA.
 Floods & Flood Plains (1975-1978); 2 boxes Box 1 CorrespondenceMedia
 American Society of Planning Officials-Planning Advisory Service-Report, 1972Congressional Committees-Reports,
 Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin-Report, 1974
 Natural Resources Defense Council-Comments-Flood Management Criteria
 Natural Resources Defense Council-Flood brochures
 Natural Hazards Research & Applications Research Center-Bibliographies
 U.S. Dept of Agriculture-Economic Research Service-Working paper
 U.S. Dept of Housing & Urban Development-Flood Insurance Administration-Brochures
 U.S. Dept of Housing & Urban Development-Flood Insurance Administration-Federal Register
 U.S. Dept of Housing & Urban Development-Flood Insurance Administration-Legislation
 Box 2 U.S. Dept of Housing & Urban Development-Flood Insurance Administration-ReportsU.S. Dept of the Interior-Flood Plains forum issue papers
 U.S. Geological Survey-Report
 U.S. Water Resources Council-Guidelines
 Delmarva Waterway (1976); 2 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1976 Media-Clippings U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1976). Preliminary report. Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterwayin Delaware, Maryland and Virginia (Delmarva Waterway). General design
                                    memorandum
 phase 1, draft environmental impact statement. Philadelphia: Author.
 Box 2 Draft environmental impact statements—Comments Reports: Shabman, L.A., Willing, P., Allee, D.P. (1972). The political economy of a Corps of Engineers project             report: The Delmarva Waterway. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University. Virginia Institute of Marine Science. (1974). Assateague Marine Sanctuary: A case study.Gloucester Point: Author.
 Soil Erosion Control Projects [Subject Files] (1976-1978); 1 boxSee also: Record Group 3 Sub-group III.3 Series 2- Barrier Islands
 Box 1 Hutchinson Island, South Carolina-Correspondence, media, 1976Manatee Co. Florida Beach Erosion Control Project-Phase I design memorandum, 1978
 Ocean City, Maryland-Correspondence, 1978
 Ocean City, Maryland-Final environmental impact statement-Wastewater treatment facility,
                                 1978
 Santa Rosa Island, Florida-Correspondence, 1977
 Development Projects [Subject Files] (1976-1978); 3 boxes Box 1 Christina River / bridge construction, Delaware-CorrespondenceCross Florida Barge Canal-Correspondence, 1976
 Curlew Creek, Florida-Correspondence, 1976
 Estero Bay, Florida-Correspondence, 1976
 Falling Springs sewer line construction-Correspondence, 1976
 Lake St. Clair, Michigan-Correspondence, media,
 Mining, Little Sand Lake, Wisconsin-Correspondence
 Mount Rogers Scenic Highway / Recreation Area-Correspondence, 1977
 Mount Rogers Scenic Highway / Recreation Area-Media-The Plow, June 1978 (2 issues)
 Mount Rogers Scenic Highway / Recreation Area-Media-Newsletter of the Citizens for Southwest Virginia, May & August 1978
 Box 2 Mount Rogers Scenic Highway / Recreation Area-Draft environmental statementMount Rogers Scenic Highway / Recreation Area-Citizens for Southwest Virginia-Response
                                 to DEIS
 Mystic Harbour, Maryland-Correspondence
 Obion Creek, Kentucky-Correspondence, 1977
 Peterson Pine Island, Florida-Correspondence, 1978
 Phosphate mining, Florida, 1976
 Punta Gorda Isles Development-Correspondence, 1976
 Box 3 Punta Gorda Isles Development-Draft environmental impact statementSanibel Island, Florida-Articles
 Sand & gravel extraction, Gunpowder Falls, Maryland-Correspondence
 Swan Point, Maryland-Correspondence, 1975
 Tortoise Island Development, Florida-Correspondence, 1975
 West Galveston Island, Texas-Correspondence, 1978
 Water Policy Reform (1977); 2 boxes Box 1 Media-Press releases Hearings before the Water Resources Subcommittee, Senate Committee on Public Works-Testimony,
                                 1974-1975 Council on Environmental Quality-National Environmental Protection ActEnvironmental Defense Fund-Memoranda
 Natural Resources Defense Council-President’s re-organization proposals
 National Governors Association-Proposed policy statement, 1978
 U.S. Department of the Interior-Fish & Wildlife Service-Land trade-offs
 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (subject)-Reports
 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Correspondence
 Box 2 Water Resources Council-CorrespondenceWater Resources Council-Conference on Water-Panels, issues, papers, 1975
 Water Resources Council-Reports, 1975
 Water Policy Study-Task Force reports
 Water Policy Study-Drafts, working papers
 Water Project Review:Media
 Citizens Committee on Natural Resources-Memoranda, 1977
 Coalition for Water Project Review-Memoranda, 1977
 Environmental Defense Fund-Memoranda & federal water project summaries
 Wetlands Taxation (1977-1978); 1 boxSee also: Record Group 2-Sub-group V: Lido Beach
 Box 1 CorrespondencePress release
 Intern reports:Brashares, E. (1977). Introduction to property taxation. Draft typescript.
 Brashares, E. (1977). The value of wetlands. Draft typescript.
 Brashares, E. (1977). Property taxation and protection of wetlands in a few states. Draft typescript.
 Proposed legislation Reports / articles by subject:Development rights
 Property taxes
 State laws on land & water resources
 Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA)/Clean Water Act—Section 404 (1977-1978);3 boxes
 Box 1 Media Subject Files:Environmental Management Plans
 Executive Order 11990-Protection of wetlands
 FWPCA Section 404 Program review—Environmental Protection Agency
 FWPCA Section 404-General permits
 FWPCA Section 404-Cases
 FWPCA Section 404-Congressional Record
 FWPCA Section 404—Regulations-Environmental Defense Fund-Documents
 FWPCA Section 404—Regulations-Environmental Defense Fund-Comments
 FWPCA Section 404—Regulations-Environmental Protection Agency-Documents
 FWPCA Section 404—Regulations-Natural Resources Defense Council-Comments
 Box 2 FWPCA Section 404—Regulations-Environmental Protection Agency-DocumentsFWPCA Section 404(b)—Rules & regulations-Environmental Protection Agency
 State 404 Permit Programs-Environmental Protection Agency-Documents
 FWPCA Section 404-Law review articles
 Box 3 FWPCA Section 404-Law review articlesFWPCA Section 404-Harvard Law Review-Edward Thompson draft article
 Federal projects-Bureau of Reclamation memorandum
 H.R. 3199 (Wright amendment)-Hearings-Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Non-point source control-Correspondence, 1977
 Rural Clean Water Program-DEIS-Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Soil & water conservation-Correspondence
 U.S. Corps of Engineers-EPA regulations
 Water quality management plans-Memoranda, 1977
 Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program (1977-1978); 2 boxes Box 1 Testimony—Edward Thompson, Jr. on the Draft Maryland Coastal Zone Management Plan,
                                 July 1977 Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program document, December 1977Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program document replacement pages, June 1978
 Box 2 U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Coastal Zone Management. (1978). State of Maryland Coastal Management Program and Final environmental impact statement.
 Annapolis: Author.
 Maine Coastal Zone Management Program (1978); 2 boxes Boxes 1-2 U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Coastal Zone Management. (1978). Maine’s coastalprogram: Draft environmental impact statement. Washington, D.C.: Author.
 U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Coastal Zone Management. (1978). Maine’s coastalprogram: Final environmental impact statement. Washington, D.C.: Author.
 Barrier Islands (1978); 2 boxesSee also: Soil erosion control projects
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1978Correspondence-FOIA request of the USDA
 Correspondence—USDA Wetlands Task Force,
 Media Barrier Islands Workshop-PolicyBarrier Islands Coalition-Workshop report, correspondence
 Coastal Barrier Island Study, 1977
 Reports & articles-Miscellaneous Reports: Warner, L. (1976). Status of Barrier Islands of the Southeastern Coast: A summary of the BarrierIsland inventory. New York: Open Space Institute, Natural Resources Defense Council.
 Golberg, T. (1978). Barrier Island ecology. Typescript. Box 2 Draft book chapters-Don Goldman Delaware River Basin Comprehensive Study (Level B) (1978); 3 boxesNote: See also Tocks Island Dam
 Box 1 Delaware River Basin Commission:Policies, code, regulations
 Annual Report, 1966, 1971-1976, 1978
 15th Water Resources Program (preliminary), September 1978
 Level B Study Planning:Guidelines for regional or river basin planning-Water Resources Council
 Plan of study-Delaware River Basin Commission, 1977
 Level B study—planning—comments, 1977
 Box 2 Level B Study Planning:Study Steering Committee
 Study Advisory Committee
 Level B Study Interim Report:Interim report (incomplete), May 1978
 Comments
 Box 3 Proposed impoundments—Delaware River Basin Commission:Comments-EDF, 1978
 Cost / Benefit Methodology—U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Agriculture-Ecology Project (1978); 2 boxes Box 1 Proposed EDF Agri-ecology project, 1978Correspondence
 Copies of correspondence-Re: North Carolina farms
 Media-Press releases, clippings
 National Agricultural Research Planning Committee-National Planning Committee-Report
                                 on land use, 1975 U.S. Dept of Agriculture-Pamphlets, brochuresU.S. Dept of Agriculture-Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service-Water
                                 Bank Pgm
 U.S. Dept of Agriculture-Economic Research Service-Reports-Farmland, 1970s
 U.S. Dept of Agriculture-Water policy report to the U.S. Dept of the Interior, 1978
 United States. (1977). Soil, water, air sciences charters. [Washington]: Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
 Wunderlich, G. (1975). Land along the Blue Ridge: Ownership and use of land in Rappahannock County, Virginia. Agricultural economic report, no. 299. [Washington]: Economic Research
 Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
 Seminar on the Retention of Prime Lands. Recommendations on prime lands: Prepared at theSeminar on the Retention of Prime Lands, July 16-17, 1975, sponsored by
                                    the USDA
 Committee on Land Use. [Washington]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture [1975].
 Seminar on the Retention of Prime Lands. (1975). Perspectives on prime lands: Background papers for seminar on the retention of prime lands, July 16-17, 1975. [Washington]: U.S. Dept. of
 Agriculture.
 United States. (1974). Research and data needs for land use planning: A report. Washington: USDA.
 Box 2 U.S. Dept of Agriculture-Economic Research Service (1974). The U.S. food & fiber sector: Energy     use and outlook. A study of the energy needs of the food industry. Presented to the
 Subcommittee on Agricultural Credit and Rural Electrification of the Senate
                                 Committee
 on Agriculture and Forestry.
 Soil Conservation Society of America. (1976). The World food situation: Implications for landresource conservation. Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society of America.
 United States. (1978). Water conservation: Preliminary proposals for Federal agency programchanges. [Washington]: The Task Force.
 National Agricultural Land Policy Act. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Family
                                 Farms, RuralDevelopment, and Special Studies of the House Committee on Agriculture,
                                 1977.
 Fisheries Management (1978-1979); 2 boxes Box 1 Management of the anchovy, coral, crab, reef fish: U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. Southwest Region. (1977). Draft environmental impact statement on the fishery management plan for the northern anchovy fishery. s.l: s.n.].
 Striped bass—Maryland Dept of Natural Resources-Correspondence, 1979 Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, & United States. (1978). Final environmental impactstatement/fishery management plan for the butterfish fishery of the northwest Atlantic
 Ocean. Dover, Del: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council.
 Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (U.S.). (1979). Environmental impact statement on thefishery management plan for the precious coral fisheries (and associated non-precious
 corals) of the Western Pacific Region. Honolulu, Hawaii: The Council.
 Southeast Fisheries Center (U.S.), & United States. (1978). Draft environmental impact statementand fishery management plan for stone crabs (Gulf of Mexico). Tampa, Fla: Fisheries
 Management Council.
 Tanner crab-Draft management plan-North Pacific Fisheries Management Council, 1977 Thomas, J. C. (1973). An analysis of the commercial lobster (Homarus americanus) fishery Along the coast of Maine, August 1966 through December 1970. NOAA technical report NMFS
 SSRF, 667. Seattle, Wash: National Marine Fisheries Service.
 Dow, R. L., Bell, F. W., & Harriman, D. M. (1975). Bioeconomic relationships for the Maine lobsterfishery with consideration of alternative management schemes. NOAA technical report
 NMFS SSRF, 683. Seattle, WA: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
 Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service.
 Box 2 Management of salmon, billfish/sharks, shrimp: Parsons, J. W. (1973). History of salmon in the Great Lakes, 1850-1970. Technical papers of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 68. Washington: U.S. Bureau of
                                 Sport Fisheries and
 Wildlife; for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Office
 Pacific Fishery Management Council (U.S.). (1977). Draft fishery management plan and environmental impact statement for commercial and recreational salmon
                                    fisheries off the
 coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California commencing in 1978. Portland, Or: Pacific
 Fishery Management Council.
 Fishery Management—Salmon—Pacific Fishery Management Council, copies of memoranda,
                                 1978 United States. (1978). Final environmental impact statement/preliminary fishery management planPacific billfish and oceanic sharks. Terminal Island, Calif: Dept. of Commerce, National
 Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service,
 Southwest Region.
 Eldridge, P. J., & Goldstein, S. A. (1975). The shrimp fishery of the South Atlantic United States:A regional management plan. Charleston: South Carolina Marine Resources Center,
 South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Dept.
 Shrimp management-Report excerpt-Socio-economic characteristics, 1978 Shrimp management-Report excerpt-Legal considerations, 1978 Sub-group III.4: Water Resources / Wetlands Program—Public Statements / Texts Box 1 SERIES 1: Comments Environmental Defense Fund. (1971). [Comments on a proposed regulation to issue permitsto discharge pollutants into navigable waters].
 
 Lang, S. (1972). [Re: Permit for the expansion of Dundalk Marine Terminal in Baltimore
                                 Harbor].
 Letter to Edward Furia, Environmental Protection Agency.
 Watson, H.L. (1972). Comments on proposed regulations for vessel and oil transfer
                                 facilities. Letter to the U.S. Coast Guard.
 Hallman, R,M., Greenberg, E.V.C. (1973). [Re: Construction requirement for tank ships].
                                 Letter to the U.S. Coast Guard.
 Environmental Defense Fund et al. (1975). Comments on Tocks Island Comprehensive ReviewStudy.
 Graff, T. J. (1972). [Comments on the Auburn-Folsom South Unit of Central Valley Project].Letter to the Hon. Caspar Weinberger, Director Office of Management &
                                 Budget.
 Butler, W.A., Thompson, E. (1974). [Comments on the draft environmental statement
                                 DES 74-33 proposed Assateague Island Wilderness Area]. Letter to the Bureau of Sport
                                 Fisheries and
 Wildlife, U.S. Dept of the Interior.
 Tripp. J.T.B., Callison, C.H. (1974). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund et al. on certainsections of the Marco Island preliminary draft environmental impact statement.
 Thompson, E. (1975). [Maintenance dredging, Atlantic Intra-Coastal Waterway, CharlestonDistrict of the Corps of Engineers].  Letter to Mr. Jack E. Raven, Regional
                                 Administrator,
 Environmental Protection Agency.
 Box 2 Thompson, E. (1975). [Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on docket no. R-75-316,
                                 Proposed rulemaking, National Flood Insurance Program]. Letter to the
                                 Office of the
 General Counsel, Dept of Housing and Urban Development.
 Thompson, E. (1975). [Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the draft environmentalimpact statement, flood plain management regulations, November 1974].
                                 Letter to the
 Office of Flood Insurance, Federal Insurance Administration, Dept of Housing
                                 and Urban
 Development.
 Edelman, L. (1975). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fun on “Water Resources: Useand Management” policy statement [of the Dept of the Interior].
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1976). Comments on the draft environmental impact statement on Foothills Project.
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1976). Comments on the draft environmental impact statement on “Proposed Dolores National Wild and Scenic River”.
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1976).  Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Water Quality Standards for Salinity including Numeric Criteria and Plan of
                                    Implementation
 for Salinity Control in the Colorado River System.”
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1976). Comments on the draft environmental impact statement on the Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program.
 El-Ashry, M.T. et al. (1977). [Re: Programmatic environmental impact statement on
                                 the ColoradoRiver Storage Project]. Letter to the Hon. Cecil Andrus, Dept of the Interior.
 Tripp, J.T.B., Moskowitz, P.D. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the United States Army Corps of Engineers “Hudson River Project” draft environmental
 impact statement.
 Trujillo, G. et al. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the proposed
                                 White River Dam and Reservoir.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the initialplanning analysis and work directives of the Delaware River Basin Comprehensive
                                    Study
 (Level B).
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the environmental assessment report (December 1977) for the Grand Valley Unit of the Colorado
 River Basin Salinity Control Project.
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the June 1978 reviewdraft report, “Irrigation Water Use and Management” of the technical work
                                    group for the
 Interagency Task Force on Irrigation Efficiencies.
 Zimmerman, K., Warner, L. (1979). [Re: Notice of proposed consent decree in First
                                 Charter Land Corporation et al. no. 78-14-N and request for public comment, D.J. Ref.
                                 62-81-2
 (Captain’s Cove). Letter to James W. Moorman, U.S. Dept of Justice.
 Zimmerman, K. (1979). [Land and resource management proposed regulations, 44 Fed.
                                 Reg. 26554 (May 4, 1979)]. Letter to Chief, Forest Service, Dept of Agriculture.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the final draft report and environmental impact statement of the Delaware River
                                    Basin Commission’s
 Level B Study.
 SERIES 2: Testimony / Statements July 25, 1973: Testimony of Eldon V.C. Greenberg, Center for Law and Social Policy,
                                 on behalf of the Sierra Club, EDF, NRDC, National Parks and Conservation Association
                                 and the Friends of the Earth, regarding S. 1751, before a Special Joint Subcommittee
                                 of the Senate Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs, Commerce and Public Works. August 2, 1973: Testimony of Gerald H. Meral, Staff Scientist, Environmental Defense
                                 Fund, on the proposed list of toxic pollutants by the Environmental Protection Agency,
                                 before the Effluent Standards and Water Quality Information Advisory Committee. August 21, 1974: Testimony of Chester Stern on Colorado River salinity standards at
                                 Environmental Protection Agency hearings. Tripp, J.T.B. (1975, January). Planning requirements of the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act amendments. Presented at the ALI-ELI Conference.
 Pring, G. W. (1975, February). Reclamation law constraints on energy/industrial uses of western water. Address before the American Bar Association Water Conference, Denver.
 July 22, 1975. Statement by the Environmental Defense Fund on the comprehensive study
                                 of Tocks Island Lake Project and alternatives, before the Delaware River Basin Commission.
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1975, December). Remarks of Dr. Mohamed T. El-Ashry, Staff Scientist on some of the pressing environmental issues facing the Rocky Mountain West.  Presented in the
 “Environmental Town Meeting” held by EPA-Region VIII, Denver.
 Thompson, E. (1977, February). Speech before attendees at the Corps of Engineers’
                                 RegulatoryFunctions Training Program, Alexandria, Virginia.
 March 21, 1977: Testimony of Mohamed T. El-Ashry before the Dept of the Interior Water
                                 Projects Review Team, Hearings on Fruitland Mesa, Dolores and Savery-Pot Hook Water Projects.
 March 29, 1977: Statement of James T. B. Tripp, on behalf of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund, on the Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf and Black Navigation Project,
                                 Louisiana, before the Federal Review hearing. April 20, 1977: Testimony of Edward Thompson, Jr., Environmental Defense Fund, on
                                 the budget of the Interior Department, before the House Appropriations Subcommittee
                                 on Interior and Related Agencies. El-Ashry, M.T. (1977). Speech before the Annual Meeting of Colorado Professional Engineers,
                                 Boulder.
 July 28, 1977. Comments of Mohamed T. El-Ashry on the need for a national water policy,
                                 before the Water Resource Policy Study hearing, Denver. August 5, 1977: Statement of Edward Thompson, Jr. on behalf of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund, on water policy, before the U.S. Water Resources Council. September 22, 1977: Testimony of Paula C. Phillips, representing the Environmental
                                 Defense Fund, before the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, U.S.
                                 Dept of the Interior, Public Hearings on proposed interim regulations for the Surface
                                 Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, Denver. El-Ashry, M.T. (1977, November). Colorado River salinity and its control. Presented before the 13th Annual Meeting of the American Water Resources Association, Tucson,
                                 AZ.
 El-Ashry, M.T. (1978, February). Quality management of irrigation return flows in WesternUnited States. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the
 Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.
 March 22, 1978: Testimony of Mohamed T. El-Ashry, on water supply for energy development,
                                 before the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Subcommittee on
                                 Energy
 Production and Supply.
 September 16, 1978: Testimony of Mohamed T. El-Ashry at the Hearing on the President’s
                                 waterpolicy recommendations, before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public
                                 Works,
 Subcommittee on Water Resources.
 April 11, 1979: Testimony of William A. Butler, General Counsel, Environmental Defense
                                 Fund, before the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Authorization Hearings for the Department
                                 of Justice Land and Natural Resources Division.
 SERIES 3: Writings by Program Staff Harris, R.H. (1973). Will water pollution ever be halted? Manuscript submitted to the Great Lakes Sportsman.
 Environmental Defense Fund et al. (ca. 1973). The Auburn-Folsom South Unit of the Central ValleyProject: An appraisal. Manuscript.
 Cicchetti, C.J. (undated). How to insure that water resource development projects are sociallyjustified. Draft manuscript.
 Wilson, R. J. (ca. 1973). Tocks Island and flood control. Manuscript. El-Ashry, M.T. (1976). Physical and ecological aspects of the upper Colorado River Basin in relationto energy development and environmental problems: A discussion. Manuscript.
 El-Ashry, M.T., Weaver, R. (1977). Colorado water projects: Impacts and alternatives. Manuscript. Article appeared in The Denver Post, April 17, 1977.
 Sub-Group IV: Wildlife Program  Sub-group IV.1 Wildlife Program—Staff Files SERIES 1: Michael Bean  Box 1 Chronological files, 1976-1981 U.S. Navy bombing exercises-Kaula Island, Hawaii: Correspondence, 1979Copies of correspondence, 1976, 1979-1980
 Media-Clippings, 1980
 Report (environmental impact statement)-Kaula Island target-Dept. of the Navy, 1976
 Report (memorandum)-Trip to Kaula-State of Hawaii Dept of Natural Resources, 1979
 Minutes-Executive session of the 17th Meeting of the Marine Mammal Commission, 1978
 Documents-FOIA requests
 Box 2 Documents-FOIA requests Playa lakes: Media-Clippings, 1978Copies of correspondence, 1978
 Notes
 Environmental impact assessments for projects affecting the Mediterranean: Reports-Barbara Blum, United Nations Environmental Programme, 1982-1983 Upper Chester River Watershed Project: Correspondence—Environmental Defense Fund, 1984Copies of memoranda—Environmental Policy Institute, 1984
 SERIES 2: William Y. Brown  Box 1 Correspondence & memoranda, January 1982-December 1984 Sub-group IV.2 Wildlife Program—Legal Files SERIES 1: Litigation & Hearings  Tuna / Porpoise: Regulations Governing Taking of Marine Mammals During Commercial
                                    Fishing Operations (1974-1977); 28 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1974Correspondence, January-September 1975
 Box 2 Correspondence, September-November 1975Correspondence, 1976
 Correspondence, 1977
 Correspondence, 1978
 Correspondence—Marine Mammal Commission, 1975-1976
 Correspondence, n.d.
 Box 3 Memoranda, 1976 Media—ClippingsMedia—Articles
 Media—Bulletins
 Box 4 Public Hearing on possible amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
                                    governingencircling gear: yellowfin tuna purse seining
 Transcript of proceedings, December 1974Exhibits (?)—National Marine Fisheries Service—Tuna-Porpoise Problem: Review of Research
                                 Progress
 Hearing on proposed regulations governing the taking of marine mammals during the
                                    course ofcommercial fishing operations
 Transcript of testimony—Joseph R. Blum, Department of Commerce, May 15, 1974Transcript of testimony—Paul Anderson, Seiners Association, May 15, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—William P. Jensen, National Marine Fisheries Service, May
                                 15, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—Joseph Blum, May 15, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—Antoni Pisano, National Marine Fisheries Service, May 16,
                                 1974
 Transcript of testimony—Thomas Wimmer, National Audubon Society, May 16, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—Richard Hodgkins, Westgate Terminals, May 16, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—Henry Truby, World Dolphin Foundations, May 16, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—Alix Jay, Porpoise News, May 16, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—J.H. Zolzezzi, fisherman, May 16, 1974
 Transcript of testimony—William P. Jensen, May 16, 1974
 Box 5 Hearing on proposed regulations governing the taking of marine mammals during the
                                    course ofcommercial fishing operations
 Recommended decisionPleadings—Briefs—Environmental Defense Fund
 Pleadings—Briefs—Marine Mammal Commission
 Pleadings—Briefs—Tuna Research Foundation
 Hearing on regulations governing taking of marine mammals during the course of commercial
                                    fishing operations before the House Committee on Merchant Marines & Fisheries Transcript of proceedings, August 1974 Hearings to consider re-issuance of incidental take general permit before the National
                                    Marine Fisheries Service Transcript of testimony—Brian Rothschild, National Marine Fisheries Service, October
                                 9, 1975Transcript of testimony—William Fox, National Marine Fisheries Service, October 9,
                                 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Gerald Howard, National Marine Fisheries Service, October
                                 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Morton M. Miller, National Marine Fisheries Service, October
                                 9, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—John Hodges, American Tunaboat Association, October 9, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Gordon Broadhead, American Tunaboat Association, October 9,
                                 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Manuel Silva, fisherman, October 10, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Harold Medina, fisherman, October 10, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Joseph Medina, fisherman, October 10, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Julius Zolezzi—American Tunaboat Association
 Transcript of testimony—John J. Royal—ILW Fisherman’s Union of San Diego, October
                                 10, 1975
 Box 6 Hearings to consider re-issuance of incidental take general permit before the National
                                    Marine Fisheries Service Transcript of testimony—Richard Gutting, Environmental Defense Fund, October 10, 1975Transcript of testimony—William Brown, Monitor, Inc., October 10, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Christine Stevens, Society for Animal Protective Legislation
 Transcript of testimony—Jane Reisk, Animal Protection Institute of America, October
                                 10, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Virginia Hanley, Fund for Animals, October 10, 1975
 Transcript of testimony—Monitor Inc., October 10, 1975
 Supplemental hearings to consider re-issuance of incidental take general permit before
                                    the National Marine Fisheries Service
 Transcript of proceedings, October 25, 1975, n.d. Submissions—American Tunaboat AssociationSubmissions—National Marine Fisheries Service
 Box 7 Hearings to consider re-issuance of incidental take general permit before the National
                                    Marine Fisheries Service Submissions—Miscellaneous Committee for Humane Legislation v. Dent et al. No. 74-1465 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Complaint, December 1974Pleadings, January 1975-January 1976
 Box 8 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Dent et al. No. 74-1465 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Pleadings, January-May 1976Order staying judgment pending appeal, May 1976
 Pleadings, November-December 1976
 Box 9 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Dent et al. No. 74-1465 (U.S. Dist. Ct., D.C.) Pleadings, December 1976-1977 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Richardson No. 76-1479 & cons. cases(U.S. Ct of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)
 Pleadings—Briefs:Reply of the American Tunaboat Association
 Reply of the Pacific Legal foundation
 Joint Brief for the appellees Committee for Humane Legislation et al.
 Brief—The Humane Society
 Reply of the American Tunaboat Association
 Federal appellants
 Box 10 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Richardson No. 76-1479 & cons. cases(U.S. Ct of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)
 Pleadings, 1976-1977 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Richardson No. 76-2170Fund for Animals v. Richardson No. 76-2168
 Pleadings, January-February 1977 Box 11 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Richardson No. 76-2170Fund for Animals v. Richardson No. 76-2168
 Pleadings, February 1977 Hearings on regulations governing taking of marine mammals incidental to commercial
                                    fishing operations before the House Committee on Merchant Marines & Fisheries Transcript excerpts, May 1976Statements, May 1976
 Box 12 Hearings on regulations governing taking of marine mammals incidental to commercial
                                    fishing operations before the House Committee on Merchant Marines & Fisheries Notes on hearings Motor Vessels Theresa Ann et al. v. Richardson No. 76-963-S (U.S. Dist. Ct., So. Dist,
                                    Calif) Pleadings, 1976-1977 Motor Vessels Theresa Ann et al. v. Richardson No. 76-3368 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th
                                    Cir.) Pleadings Box 13 Hearings to consider re-issuance of permits governing incidental taking of marine
                                    mammals MMPAH No. 2-1976
 Transcript of proceedings, November 15, 1976Transcript of testimony—William Fox, November 16, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—John Mulligan, November 16, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Murray D. Bryce, Commonweath of Puerto Rico
 Transcript of testimony—William Fox, November 17, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—James K. Sebenius—NOAA, November 17, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Winfred H. Meibohm, National Marine Fisheries Service
 Transcript of testimony—Douglas Chapman, November 17, 1976
 Box 14 Transcript of testimony—Douglas Chapman, November 18, 1976Transcript of testimony—John T. Everett, National Marine Fisheries Service
 Transcript of testimony—William Jensen, National Marine Fisheries Service
 Transcript of testimony—Gordon Broadhead, Living Marine Resources, November 19, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Kenneth Morris, Marine Mammal Commission, November 22, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Steven Edney, United Cannery & Industrial Workers of the Pacific
 Transcript of testimony—Workers in cannery industry, November 22, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Stephen Anderson, economist on tuna industry, November 22,
                                 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Zoe E. Stout, Pacific Legal Foundation, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Wym Coerr, Defenders of Wildlife, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Virginia Hanley, Fund for Animals, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Stanley Minasian, Save the Dolphins, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Robert K. Cleator, Nuttal Styris (marine hardware store)
 Transcript of testimony—Paul Kelly, November 23, 1976
 Box 15 Transcript of testimony—Pete Wilson, Mayor of San Diego, November 23, 1976Transcript of testimony—Paul Kelly, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Thomas Barber, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—William Silva, Tunaboat captain, November 23, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Johnny O’Connor, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—William Evans, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Maurice Correia, fisherman, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Mario Crivello, fisherman, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—David Lloyd Burdick, statistician, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Bernard Fink, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Fredrick W. Brown, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Julius Zolezzi, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Robert K. Cleator, November 24, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Stanley Levitz, November 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Steven Soares, fisherman, November 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Andrew Castagnola, on behalf of the American Tunaboat Association
 Transcript of testimony—John Anthony Silva on behalf of the American Tunaboat Association
 Transcript of testimony—Paul Magellan, American Tunaboat Association, November 26,
                                 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Manuel Vargas, fisherman, November 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—John Gonsalves, American Tunaboat Association, November 26,
                                 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Harold F. Cary, American Tunaboat Association, November 26,
                                 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Thomas Anthony Crivello, American Tunaboat Association
 Transcript of testimony—George Zeluff, November 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Vincent J. Guarassi, American Tunaboat Association, November
                                 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Agostino Guidi, fisherman, November 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Manuel Silva, American Tunaboat Association, November 26,
                                 1976
 Transcript of testimony—A. Jacob Abrams, November 26, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—John P. Mulligan, American Tunaboat Association, December
                                 1, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Franklin Alverson, American Tunaboat Association, December
                                 1, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—August Felando, American Tunaboat Association, December 1,
                                 1976
 Box 16 Transcript of testimony—William Gensen, December 1, 1976Transcript of testimony—Norman Mendes, National Marine Fisheries Service, December
                                 1, 1976
 Transcript of testimony--John P. Mulligan, American Tunaboat Association, December
                                 2, 1976
 Transcript of testimony--Franklin Alverson, American Tunaboat Association, December
                                 3, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—August Felando, American Tunaboat Association, December 3,
                                 1976
 Transcript of testimony—William Aron, National Marine Fisheries Service, December
                                 4, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—Lawrence Van Mier, Pacific Legal Foundation, December 4, 1976
 Transcript of testimony—William Fox, National Marine Fisheries Service, December 4,
                                 1976
 Pleadings, November-December 1976 Box 17 Hearings to consider re-issuance of permits governing incidental taking of marine
                                    mammals MMPAH No. 2-1976
 Pleadings—Briefs—Environmental Defense FundPleadings—Briefs—American Tunaboat Association
 Pleadings—Briefs—National Marine Fisheries Service
 Recommended decision, January 1977 Pleadings, February 1977 Exhibits:Franklin Alverson
 Box 18 Exhibits:Franklin Alverson
 American Tunaboat Association
 William Aron
 Gordon Broadhead
 Murray D. Bryce
 Douglas Chapman
 Box 19 Exhibits:John T. Everett
 August Felando
 William Fox
 John Hodges
 William Jensen
 Marine Mammal Commission
 John P. Mulligan
 National Marine Fisheries Service
 William F. Perrin
 James K. Sebenius
 Zoe Stout
 Lawrence Van Mier
 Box 20 ExhibitsCounsel’s notes
 Box 21 Motor Vessels Theresa Ann et al. v. Kreps No. 77-1401 (U.S. Dist Ct., 9th Cir.) Pleadings, February 1977 Committee for Humane Legislation v. Kreps Civil no. 77-0564 (U.S. Dist Ct.) Pleadings, April-May 1977 American Tunaboat Association v. Kreps No. 77-0238-S (U.S. Dist Ct.) Pleadings, April 1977 Box 22 American Tunaboat Association v. Kreps No. 77-0238-S (U.S. Dist Ct.) Pleadings, April-May 1977 Hearings before the National Marine Fisheries Service on regulations to govern taking
                                    of marine mammals incidental to commercial fishing Transcript of proceedings, pre-hearing conference, August 12, 1977Transcript of testimony—John T. Everett, August 24, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—James Coe, National Marine Fisheries Service, August 26, 1977
 Box 23 Hearings before the National Marine Fisheries Service on regulations to govern taking
                                    of marine mammals incidental to commercial fishing Transcript of testimony—Warren Stentz, August 26, 1976Transcript of testimony—William F. Jensen, August 26, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—James Coe, August 27, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Franklin Alverson, August 27, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Gordon Broadhead, August 27, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—August Felando, August 27, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Wesley W. Parks, August 29, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Millard Hines, August 29, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Harold Cary, August 29, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Manuel Jorge, August 29, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Max Schetter, San Diego Chamber of Commerce, August 29, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—H. Cushman Dow, San Diego Chamber of Commerce
 Transcript of testimony—Michael Shontz, August 29, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Winfred Meibohm, September 6, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Manuel H. Dubon, September 6, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Lawrence Van Mier, Tuna Research Foundation, September 7,
                                 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Dennis King, National Marine Fisheries Service, September
                                 7, 1977
 Box 24 Transcript of testimony—Dennis King, September 7, 1977Transcript of testimony—Manuel Silva, September 8, 1977
 Transcript of testimony—Franklin Alverson, September 8, 1977
 Oral argument, October 7, 1977
 Pleadings—Brief—Environmental Defense FundFinal Environmental Impact Statement, November 1977
 Exhibits:Franklin Alverson
 Jack C. Bowland
 Gordon Broadhead
 Box 25 Exhibits:Captains affidavits
 Harold Cary
 James Coe
 Manuel Dubon
 John Everett
 August Felando
 William Fox
 William Jensen
 Dennis King
 Box 26 Exhibits:Alfred Klein
 Winfred Meibohm
 Wesley Parks
 William Perrin
 Warren Stuntz
 Lawrence Van Mier
 Counsel’s notes Box 27 Motor Vessels Theresa Ann et al. v. Richardson No. 76-963-E (U.S. District Ct., So. Dist., California)
 Pleadings—Jurisdiction, October 1976Pleadings—Temporary restraining order, October 1976
 Complaint
 Motor Vessels Theresa Ann et al. v. Kreps No. 77-1401 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th Cir.)
 Motion for stay pending appeal Box 28 Fact sheets / copies of correspondence, 1974-1976 Proposed regulations governing taking of marine mammals during fishing operations:Findings of fact / brief—Environmental Defense Fund, 1974
 Hearings on reissue of permits to allow taking of marine mammals—Statements, 1975 Proposed amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act-Testimony, 1976 Fund for Animals et al. v. Richardson no. 74-1465 & cons. cases—Pleadings & exhibits Proposed amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act-Testimony of EDF, 1977 Reports—National Marine Fisheries Service, 1975 Report-Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, ca. 1975 Marine Mammals—Alaska (1976-1977); 6 boxes Request of the State of Alaska to waive moratorium on nine species of marine mammal
                                    & allow state to resume management. Hearings before the Department of the Interior,
                                    Office of Hearings & Appeals. MMPA Docket no. WASH 76-1
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1976 Transcripts of testimony:Jack Lentner on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 Vernon Kuczkuk on state management
 Karl Schneider on behalf of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
 Angel Johnson on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 Henry A. Hansen on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 Kenneth Pitcher on behalf of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
 Gregory Streveler on harbor seals
 Malcolm Edward Islieb on behalf of Cordova District Fisheries Union
 Jon James Burns on behalf of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
 Victor Campbell on hunting
 Thomas J. Ellanna on state management
 Linda J. Ellanna on state management
 Robert Blodgett on state management
 Jerome Trigg on behalf of the Bering Straits Native Corporation
 Box 2 Transcripts of testimony: Jerome Trigg on behalf of the Bering Straits Native Corporation
 Margaret Baker
 Alfred Nakak
 Roger Charles Adams on hunting
 Enoch Adams on hunting
 Gideon Barr on hunting
 George Noongwook on state management
 Caleb Pungowiyi  on behalf of the Bering Straits Native Corporation
 Anderson Apassingok on behalf of the Gambell Native Corporation
 Timothy Gologeren
 Buster Seelkoke on hunting
 Paul Rokok on hunting
 Wilfred C. Murray on hunting
 John Angaiak-Tununak Village Corporation
 David Friday on hunting
 Bob Hurwitz on hunting
 John J. Burns on behalf of the National Marine Fisheries Service
 Box 3 Transcripts of testimony:John J. Burns on behalf of the National Marine Fisheries Service
 Karl Schneider on behalf of the National Marine Fisheries Service
 Fred Woldstad-Alaska Department of Public Safety
 Robert A. Rausch on behalf of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
 Jacob Lestenkof on behalf of the Alaskan Federation of Natives
 Douglas Chapman on behalf of the Marine Mammal Commission
 Milton Kaufman-conservationist
 James G. Ferguson on behalf of the National Fisheries Institute
 Box 4 Transcripts of testimony:Sue Pressman on behalf of the Humane Society
 William Y. Brown
 Exhibits:Administrative Law Judge
 State of Alaska
 Box 5 Exhibits:Fish & Wildlife Service
 National Fisheries Institute
 National Marine Fisheries Service
 Opponents
 Uncommitted parties
 Box 6 Exhibit-State of Alaska United States, & U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1978). Consideration of a waiver of the moratorium and return of management of certain marine mammals to the State of Alaska: Final
 environmental impact statement. Washington, D.C.: The Group.
 Marine Mammals (Walrus)—Alaska (1975); 3 boxes On waiver of moratorium on walrus; Hearings before the Department of the Interior,
                                    Office of Hearings & Appeals, MMPA Docket no. WASH 75-1 Box 1 Correspondence, 1975-1976Media-Press releases & clippings
 Pleadings—Briefs: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
 Environmental Defense Fund
 Marine Mammal Commission
 State of Alaska
 Recommended decisionNegative declaration
 Transcripts of testimony:Francis H. Fay on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 Box 2 Transcripts of testimony:Francis H. Fay on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 Loren W. Croxton on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 John Burns
 Lynn Cassel et al. on behalf of Alaska Professional Hunters Association
 Raymond Tremblay on behalf of the Fish & Wildlife Service
 Robert Rausch on behalf of Alaska Department of Fish & Game
 Exhibits Box 3 Exhibits Bowhead Whale-Regulations on hunting (1978); 2 boxes Box 1 Hopson v. Krebs no. A78-184-Civ Pleadings-Re: Motion for summary judgment, November 1978 Box 2 Exhibits Columbia Dam, Duck River, Tennessee (1978-1983); 7 boxesSee also: Record Group 2, New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence-EDF, 1978-1980Correspondence-To the Army Corps of Engineers (copies), 1980
 Correspondence-Tennessee Valley Authority (copies), 1980
 Memoranda-EDF, 1979-1980Memoranda-Miscellaneous copies
 Box 2 Meetings’ notes, 1978-1980Media-Clippings
 Fact sheets, n.d.
 Wilson, D., Eisel, L.M. (1972?). Water quality and the Duck River Project.Typescript.
 Eisel, L.M. (1973?). Flood control and the Duck River Project.Typescript.
 Notices of public hearings-Army Corps of Engineers FOIA requests-Responses of the Tennessee Valley AuthorityDocument production-EDF
 Document production-Tennessee Valley Authority
 Box 3 Document production-Tennessee Valley Authority Clean Water Act section 401 Certification Hearings before the Tennessee Water Quality
                                    Board Pleadings, 1980-1981 Witnesses-GeneralWitnesses-Memoranda
 Witnesses-Depositions
 Box 4 Clean Water Act section 401 Certification Hearings before the Tennessee Water Quality
                                    Board Witnesses-DepositionsWitnesses-Testimony summaries
 Witnesses-D. Stansberry, D. Etnier, J. Williams
 Exhibits EDF et al. v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board et al. No. 81-1062-IIChancery Ct. of Davidson County
 Pleadings, 1981-1982 Box 5 EDF et al. v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board et al. No. 81-1062-IIChancery Ct. of Davidson County
 Pleadings, 1981-1982 EDF et al. v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board et al. No. 82-282-IICt. of Appeals
 Pleadings, 1982-1983 Hearings before the Senate Committee on Public Works—Re: Water Resources Development
                                 Program: Duck River, 1975 Hearings on section 404 permit before the Army Corps of Engineers—Testimony, 1979 Hearings before the Subcommittee on Environment, Energy & Natural Resources—Statements,
                                 August 1980
 Hearings before the Subcommittee on Environment, Energy & Natural Resources (Moffett
                                 Hearings)Statement, September 1980
 Box 6 Hearings before the Subcommittee on Environment, Energy & Natural Resources (Moffett
                                 Hearings)Statement, September 1980
 Background documents by subject:Columbia Dam evaluation-Report
 Fish-Journal articles
 Historical impact-Report
 Mollusks-Journal articles
 Recreation-Report
 Uniform Relocation Act-Documents
 Box 7 Background documents:THMs-Documents
 Water quality-documents
 Pittston Oil Refinery & Marine Terminal, Eastport Maine (1979); 4 boxes
 Box 1
 Correspondence, 1979-1983Correspondence (copies), 1979-1981
 Media Notes Petition of the Pittston Company for exemption from Section 7 (a) of the Endangered
                                    Species Actbefore the Endangered Species Committee
 Comments- Environmental Defense FundComments-National Marine Fisheries Service
 Statements before the Endangered Species Committee Box 2 Petition of the Pittston Company for exemption from Section 7 (a) of the Endangered
                                    Species Act Statements before the Endangered Species Board, 1979Submissions—Pittston Company
 Box 3 Petition of the Pittston Company for exemption from Section 7 (a) of the Endangered
                                    Species Act
 Papers-re: whales
 National Wildlife Foundation, EDF et al. v. Endangered Species Committee Civil action
                                    no. 79-1779 Draft complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief, n.d. Source documents
 Reports by subject:
 Refinery siting
 Box 4 Reports by subject:Oil spill risk assessment
 Impact on Fundy Bay
 Dall’s Porpoise (1981-1986); 1 box Box 1 Regulations governing the taking of marine mammals incidental to salmon fishing operations Correspondence, 1981 Docket no. MMPAH 1981-1 before the National Marine Fisheries Services Brief—Environmental Defense FundRecommended decision of the Administrative Law Judge
 Docket no. MMPAH No. 1986-1 before the National Marine Fisheries Service Briefs—Marine Mammal Commission National Marine Fisheries Service: Annual Report on Dall Porpoise-Salmon Research, 1979
 Estimation of the Abundance of Dall Porpoise in the North Pacific Ocean-Bering Sea,
                                 1981
 Draft environmental impact statement—Incidental take of Dall’s Porpoise in the Japanese
                                 Salmon Fishery, 1981
 Dall’s Porpoise Program—Final Action Plan, 1984
 Dall’s Porpoise Program—Action Plan, 1986
 Draft environmental impact statement—Incidental take of Dall’s Porpoise in the Japanese
                                 Salmon Fishery, 1986
 Pleadings—related cases Legislation Compound 1080 for Predator Control (1982); 5 boxesSee also: Sub-group II Toxic Chemicals Program for more on Rodenticides and predator
                                    control
 Hearing on applications to use Sodium Fluoracetate (Compound 1080) to control predatorsFIFRA no. 502 before the EPA
 Box 1 Pleadings:Pre-hearing, December 1981-January 1982
 Discovery & Position statements, January 1982
 Requests for answers to interrogatories, February 1982
 Box 2 Pleadings:Interrogatories, February-March 1982
 Pre-hearing / Discovery, March-April 1982
 Box 3 Pleadings, April-July 1982 Box 4 Pleadings:Statements of position
 Witness lists
 Testimony:Witness on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science
 Witnesses on behalf of the Texas Department of Agriculture
 Witnesses on behalf of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
 Witnesses on behalf of the State of Wyoming
 Boxes 4-5 Testimony—Witnesses on behalf of the State of Wyoming Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary, California (1982-1985); 1 box Box 1
 Western Oil & Gas Association v. Byrne No. 82-5034 CBM (U.S. District Ct., Central
                                    District, Caif.)
 Memoranda, 1982, 1985Pleadings
 Background documents-California Coastal Commission, re: consistency certification
 SERIES 2:  Background Documents Tuna-Porpoise Controversy: Regulations to Govern Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
                                    to Commercial Fishing Operations (1974-1977); 9 boxes Box 1 Hearings:Marine Mammal Protection Oversight Hearings, October-December 1975
 Marine Mammal Protection Act Oversight Hearings, February 1977
 Investigation into the Tuna Industry No. 751-0016 before the Federal Trade Commission
 Marine Mammal Protection Act amendments, May 1977
 Regulations governing importation of tuna products, November 1977
 Reports by author:Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
 Box 2 Reports by author:Living Marine Resources
 Marine Mammal Commission
 National Marine Fisheries Service
 National Marine Fisheries Service—Southwest Fisheries Center
 Box 3 Reports by author:National Marine Fisheries Service—Southwest Fisheries Center
 Box 4 Reports by author:National Marine Fisheries Service—Southwest Fisheries Center
 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
 Legislation:Marine Mammal Protection Act amendment bills
 Congressional Record
 Meetings:National Marine Fisheries Service-Tuna / Porpoise public meeting, 1977
 Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
 Box 5 Meetings: Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
 Workshop:Conservationist / Industry Tuna-Porpoise workshop, University of Washington
 Correspondence:National Marine Fisheries Service, 1974-1976
 Subject Files:Tuna Industry
 Box 6 Subject Files:Tuna Industry
 Research notes Box 7 Research notes Boxes 8-9 Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description Sub-group IV.3 Wildlife Program--Project Files SERIES 1: Committees & Meetings [Reserved] SERIES 2: Project Files Antarctica Subject Files (1985-1992); 22 boxes Box 1 Antarctic Advisory Committee, 1992Antarctic Conservation Act—Correspondence, 1992
 Antarctic Mineral Resources—Meeting papers, 1982-1989
 Antarctic Mineral Resources—Regime, 1982-1983
 Antarctic Mineral Resources—Reports
 Box 2 Antarctic Mineral Resources—Reports, 1982-1989Antarctic & Southern Ocean Coalition, 1985
 Antarctic Treaty System—Correspondence, 1991
 Antarctic Treaty System—International Institute for Environment & Development papers
 Box 3 Antarctic Treaty System—Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting papers, 1990Antarctic Treaty System—Protocol to Antarctic Treaty on Environmental Protection
 Antarctic Treaty System—Antarctic Inspection Protocols, 1985-1989
 Box 4 Antarctic Treaty System—Protocol to Antarctic Treaty on Environmental Protection,
                                 1991-1992Antarctic Treaty System—Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting papers, 1990-1991
 Box 5 Antarctic Treaty System—Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting papers, 1990-1991Antarctica & American Law
 Antarctica Briefing [Greenpeace] Nos. 1-6, 13, 1984, 1987
 Antarctica—Environmental issues—statements, 1989
 Box 6 Antarctica—Environmental issues—statements, 1989Antarctica—Oversight Hearings, 1984
 Conservation—Reports
 Box 7 Conservation—WildlifeConvention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—Correspondence
 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—Antarctic &
                                 Southern Ocean Coalition
 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—The Antarctic
                                 Project
 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—Antarctic Treaty
 Box 8 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—Keystone CenterConvention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—Misc. reports
 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities—Statements
 Box 9 Antarctic Minerals Convention—Report-International Institute for Environment & Development,
                                 1988Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Minerals Resource Activities—Statements
 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Minerals Resource Activities-Analysis, 1988
 Legislation-Antarctic World Park and Protection Act of 1990, H.R. 4514-Testimony
 Box 10 Environmental impact in Antarctica—Papers/reportsEnvironmental impact assessments
 French airstrip, Port Geologie, Antarctica
 Greenpeace—Reports, 1987-1988, 1990
 Heard Island Acoustical Global Warming Feasibility Experiment, 1990
 Iceberg Project—Correspondence, 1989
 Box 11 Legislation—H.R. 3416, Antarctic Marine Resources Convention Act—statements, 1984Legislation—Statement of Bruce Manheim, EDF on Protection of the Antarctic Environment,
                                 1990
 Legislation—H.R. 4514, Antarctica World Park & Protection Act of 1990
 Box 12 Legislation—H.R. 3416—Statements before the Subcommitttee on Fisheries & Wildlife
                                 Conservation & the Environment, June 1983
 Legislation—H.R. 3977, Antarctic Protection Act of 1990
 Legislation—H.R. 4210, Antarctic Conservation Act of 1990
 Marion Island
 Media—Clippings—Antarctica
 Box 13 Media—Clippings:Antarctica
 Fishing
 Mining
 Ozone
 Pollution
 Box 14 Media—Clippings—TourismMcMurdo Station—Oil Spill, 1989
 McMurdo Station—Waste Disposal, 1991
 McMurdo Station—Water Quality
 National Research Council—Reports, 1986
 Box 15 National Research Council—Polar Research Board, 1983, 1992National Science Foundation—Environmental Action Memoranda, 1991-1993
 National Science Foundation—Environmental Impact Assessment & Monitoring, 1992
 Box 16 National Science Foundation—Environmental impact assessment for Scientific/Logistical
                                 Activities, 1990National Science Foundation--Compliance with environmental law, 1989
 Box 17 National Science Foundation—Oversight hearings, March 1989National Science Foundation--Pollution regulation, 1991-1992
 National Science Foundation--U.S. Antarctic Program, 1987-1990
 Oil spill—Bahia Paraiso—Media & reports, 1989
 Oil Spill—Bahia Paraiso—Statement of Bruce Manheim, EDF, 1989
 Box 18 PolicyReprints/Articles
 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR)—Reports, 1987-1988, 1990, 1992
 Box 19 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR):SCAR Report, Nos. 1-5, 7-8, 1986-1992
 SCAR Bulletin, Nos. 81-90, 92-96, 99, 102, 104, 105, 107, 1985-1992
 SCAR—Waste disposal—Correspondence, comments, reports, 1987-1989
 Box 20 Tourism:Antarctic Traveler’s Code
 Media & Articles
 National Science Foundation Public Hearings on Antarctic Tourism, 1988
 Box 21 Tourism:Regulation
 Tour Companies
 U.S. Antarctic Program Observer Reports, 1991-1992
 Box 22 United Nations—Question of AntarcticaHistory of U.S. activities in Antarctica, (paper, no author / date)
 Vessels
 World Resources Institute—Reports, 1990-1991
 Sub-group IV.4: Wildlife Program—Public Statements / Texts Box 1 SERIES 1: Comments 1973-1979Meral, G.H. (1973). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed
 amendment to section 216.10 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
 Letter to the Director of the National Marine Fisheries Service.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1974?). Comments on the draft environmental impactstatement for promulgation of rules and proposed issuance of permits to
 commercial fisherman allowing the taking of marine mammals during the
                                    course
 of normal fishing operation.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1975). [Comments on the EIS issued by the National Marine
                                 Fisheries Services regarding porpoise killing].  Internal memorandum.
 Butler, W.A. (1977). [Comments on the American Tunaboat Association’s March 3, 1977
                                 applicationfor a general permit under the MMPA of 1972 to allow the taking of marine
                                 mammals
 incidental to commercial fishing]. Letter to Richard Schoning, Director,
                                 National Marine
 Fisheries Service.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (ca. 1975). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the proposed McCloskey bill to amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
                                    to allow
 the commercial tuna fishing fleet to continue operations while exercising
                                    due care to reduce
 incidental porpoise mortality to insignificant levels approaching near
                                    zero.
 Bean, Michael. (1979). [Re: BLM’s proposed guidelines for the identification, designation
                                 and protection of “areas of critical environmental concern” (ACEC’s)].
 Letter to Mr. Frank Gregg, Director, Bureau of Land Management.
 SERIES 2: Testimony 1971-1977September 8, 1971: John F. Hellegers, attorney, Environmental Defense Fund, before
                                 hearings of the Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation, House Committee
                                 on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.
 January 30, 1976: Statement of Joseph H. Highland to the Subcommittee on Fisheries
                                 and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment of the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries
                                 Committee. September 28, 1976: Statement of William A. Butler on behalf of the Environmental
                                 Defense Fund, Marine Mammal Oversight Hearings before the House Merchant Marine and
                                 Fisheries Committee, Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife Conservation and the Environment. March 2, 1977: Testimony of William A. Butler on behalf of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, National Audubon Society at the Oversight
                                 Hearings on the Marine Mammal Protection Act, before the  House Committee on Merchant
                                 Marine and Fisheries, Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the
                                 Environment. March 11, 1977: Testimony of Juanita Alvarez and William A. Butler on behalf of the
                                 Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, and Defenders of
                                 Wildlife at the Oversight Hearings of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, before the
                                 Senate Commerce Committee. May 13, 1977: Testimony of William A. Butler on behalf of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund and National Audubon Society regarding proposed amendments to the Marine Mammal
                                 Protection Act, before the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee. July 26, 1978: Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Fish and Wildlife
                                 Coordination Act before the Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife and the Environment
                                 of the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Box 2 1980-1984, undatedFebruary 20, 1980: Statement of Clifton E. Curtis on behalf of the Animal Welfare
                                 Institute, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Defense Fund et al. before the Subcommitteee
                                 on Oceanography and the Subcommitteee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the
                                 Environment of the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries concerning the
                                 reauthorization of Title III of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act
                                 of 1972. Draft copy.
 April 3, 1981: Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund, et al. to the Subcommittee
                                 on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment of the House Committee
                                 on Merchant Marine and Fisheries concerning the Reauthorization of the Marine Mammal
                                 Protection Act. June 23, 1983: Statement of William Y. Brown before the Subcommittee on Fisheries
                                 and Wildlife Cocnservation and the Environment, Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee,
                                 concerning the protection of wetlands. June 30, 1983: Statement of William Y. Brown before the Subcommittee on Fisheries
                                 and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment, Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee,
                                 concerning the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. October 12, 1983: Statement of the Environmental Defense Fund, National Audubon Society,
                                 Friends of the Earth. Hearing on the Army Corps of Engineers’ proposal to amend its
                                 permit regulations. November 9, 1983: Statement of William Y. Brown before the Subcommittee on Water Resources,
                                 Committee on Public Works and Transportation, United States House of Representatives,
                                 concerning section 404 of the Clean Water Act (wetlands protection). April 12, 1984: Statement of Dr. William Y. Brown, Environmental Defense Fund, before
                                 the Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations, Committee on Foreign
                                 Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives. Hearing on H.R. 3416-The Marine Living Resources
                                 Convention Act. 1984: Written statement of William Y. Brown, Sr. Scientist, EDF, before the Subcommittee
                                 on Commerce, Justice, State, the Judiciary, and related agencies, Committee on Appropriations,
                                 U.S. Senate.  Hearing on the fiscal year 1984 budget of the NOAA. September 24, 1984: Statement of William Y. Brown before the Subcommittee on Science,
                                 Technology and Space, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportaiton, U.S. Senate.
                                 Oversight Hearing on Antarcitica. SERIES 3: Writings 1981-1985Brown, W.Y. (1981). Acid rain and wildlife conservation. Manuscript.
 Brown, W.Y. (1982). The conservation principles of the Convention of the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Report.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1983). A report prepared for the United Nations EnvironmentProgramme on activities concerning the In Situ conservation of biological
                                    diversity.
 Brown, W.Y. (1984). Federal initiatives for the preservation of wetlands. Manuscript. Brown, W.Y. (1984). Protection of wetlands and other natural areas by elimination of certain taxcredits and deductions: Draft legislation and background information.  Draft report.
 Brown, W.Y. (1985). Eliminating tax subsidies to protect critical habitat for endangered species and other natural areas: A report and a model legislation. Report.
 Brown, W.Y. (undated). Gamboling in the permafrost: An essay on the arctic environment.Manuscript.
 Brown, W.Y. (undated). Corps proposals are further retreat from wetlands protection. Manuscript. Sub-group V: Energy Program Sub-group V.1: Energy Program—Staff Files SERIES 1: Subject Files Energy Program-Memorandum on future directions of the program, 1979 Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) and utility rates: Fact sheet
 CWIP in FERC electric rate base-Congressional hearings, August 1982
 CWIP legislation, H.R. 555
 Congressional testimony
 Coal gasification-Memorandum, government documents, 1970-1973 El Paso coal gasification project-Memoranda, comments, 1975Energy crisis/employment-articles
 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station-Comments, 1979Power Plant & Industrial Fuel Act-Comments, 1979
 Regulatory reform-bills, 1983 Sub-group V.2 Energy Program—Legal Files SERIES 1: Litigation & Hearings  Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (1970-1974); 22 boxesSee also: Record Group 2, New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence, 1971-1972Correspondence—Local counsel (Canada), 1973
 Media—Press releases, 1972-1973 Wilderness Society et al. v. Morton et al. No. 928-70 (U.S. Dist Ct., D.C.) Pleadings:Findings of fact, conclusions of law & preliminary injunction, April 1970
 Box 2 Wilderness Society et al. v. Morton et al. No. 928-70 (U.S. Dist Ct., D.C.) Pleadings:Discovery, February 1971
 Motions to intervene
 Re: Defendant’s motion to maintain motion as class action
 Re: Defendant’s motion for protective order
 Re: Preliminary injunction
 Re: Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment
 Amended complaint for injunction & declaratory judgment
 Pre-trial pleadings, May 1972
 Box 3 Pleadings:Answer of intervenor-plaintiffs to interrogatories by Alyeska, June 1972
 Transcript of proceedings, June 7, 1972
 Re: Defendant’s motion for protective order, June 1972
 Answer of EDF et al. to interrogatories by Alyeska, June 1972
 Answers of Alyeska to interrogatories, June 1972
 Briefs on NEPA issues, July 1972
 Intervenor State of Alaska on Mineral Leasing Act, July 1972
 Box 4 Pleadings:Briefs—Alyeska Pipeline Service Company on Mineral Leasing Act, July 1972
 Plaintiffs’ appendices, Jul 1972
 Memorandum Amicus Curiae of United Distribution Company, July 1972
 Box 5 Pleadings:Reply brief of plaintiffs, August 1972
 Transcript of proceedings—Argument on behalf of the State of Alaska
 Deposition of David Brew on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Deposition of Jared Carter on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Box 6 Pleadings:Motion of David Anderson to intervene as plaintiff, August 1972
 Box 7 Pleadings:Deposition of Jared Carter on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Deposition of Jack Horton on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Box 8 Deposition of Jack Horton on behalf of the Department of the interiorDeposition of Rogers C.B. Morton
 Deposition of Richard Nehring on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Box 9 Deposition of Richard Nehring Deposition of Fredrick Sanger on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Deposition of William Vogley on behalf of the Department of the Interior
 Depositions digest
 Box 10 Draft environmental impact statement—Trans Alaska Pipeline—Department of the Interior Box 11 Final environmental impact statement—Trans Alaska Pipeline—Department of the Interior Box 12 Environmental Impact Statement—Comments:Volume 1-Technical comments
 Volume 2-Terrestrial impact
 Volume 3-Marine impact
 Box 13 Environmental impact statement—Comments:Volume 3-Marine Impacts
 Volume 4
 State of Alaska on TAPS and alternative
 Box 14 Environmental impact statement—CommentsExhibits—Alyeska—Hearings before the Department of the Interior, 1971
 Box 15 Exhibits—Alyeska—Hearings before the Department of the Interior, 1971Exhibits—John Dienelt / EDF
 Box 16 Exhibits—John Dienelt / EDF Document production:Alyeska—Project description, Vols. 1 & 2
 Box 17 Document production:Alyeska—Project Description
 Box 18 Document production:Alyeska—Project Description
 Environmental Defense Fund
 U.S. Department of the Interior
 Box 19 Document Production:U.S. Department of the Interior
 Exhibits—Provenance Unknown—Mineral Leasing ActWitness files
 Notice of appeal—David Anderson & the Canadian Wildlife Federation, 1972
 Wilderness Society et al. v. Morton No. 72-1090 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.) Pleadings:Brief of appellants David Anderson & the Canadian Wildlife Federation
 Brief of appellees Secretary of the Interior
 Box 20 Wilderness Society et al. v. Morton No. 72-1090 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.) Pleadings:Brief of the Wilderness Society, February 1972
 Opinion, May 1972
 Wilderness Society et al. v. Morton No.  72-1797 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.)David Anderson et al. v. Morton No. 72-1796 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C.)
 Appellees’ memorandum…in response to motion for summary judgment filed May 1972Appellees’ brief in response to all plaintiffs’ briefs on NEPA issues, July 1972
 Brief of the State of Alaska on the Mineral Leasing Act & related issues, July 1972
 Opinion, February 1973
 Bill of costs, February 1973
 Rogers C.B. Morton v. Wilderness Society et al. Nos. 72-1227 / 1228/ 1229 (U.S. Supreme Ct.)
 Petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Ct. of Appeals, March 1973 Box 21 Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society et al. No. 73-1977 (U.S. Supreme
                                    Ct.)On writ of certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
 Pleadings:Brief of the Respondents Wilderness Society et al., December 1974
 Opinion, December 1974
 Proposed continued NEPA litigation:Memoranda, June-October 1973
 Pipeline expert files—Lawrence Bliss
 Box 22 Proposed continued NEPA litigation:Pipeline expert files—Lawrence Bliss
 Final environmental impact statement addendum—memoranda on research
 Appendix on deferral
 Four Corners Power Plant (1971-1973); 2 boxes National Wildlife Federation et al. v. Morton No. 1090-71 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.) Box 1 Correspondence, 1971-1973 Media-ClippingsMedia-Press releases
 Pleadings--Complaint for injunctive, declaratory & other reliefPleadings—Motions to intervene
 Box 2 Pleadings Strip Mining—Tennessee Valley Authority (1971-1974); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1971-1973Media-Press release, 1971
 Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. Tennessee Valley Authority No. 71 Civ
                                    919(U.S. District Ct., So. Dist., NY)
 Pleadings, 1971-1972 Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. Tennessee Valley Authority No. 72-1119(U.S. Ct of Appeals, 2nd Cir.)
 Joint appendix, February 1972Pleadings—Briefs—Defendant-Appellant, March 1972
 Decision, March 1972
 Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. Tennessee Valley Authority No. 8062(U.S. District Ct., Eastern Dist., TN)
 Affidavits Box 2 Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. Tennessee Valley Authority No. 8062(U.S. District Ct., Eastern Dist., TN)
 Affidavits Pleadings, 1972-1973 Box 3 Pleadings, 1973-1974Tennessee Valley Authority Annual Report, 1971
 Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. Tennessee Valley Authority No. 74-1132(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 6th Cir.)
 Plaintiffs-Appellants appendix Box 4 Plaintiffs-Appellants appendixPleadings—Brief—Plaintiff-Appellant
 Pleadings—Brief—Defendant-Appellees
 Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station—Maryland (1972-1974); 5 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1974Environmental Impact Statement—Comments—EDF
 Application of the Potomac Electric Power Company, docket nos. 50-448 / 50-449 before
                                    the Atomic Energy Commission Environmental review-Atomic Energy Commission Pleadings:Intervention-Prince George Environmental Coalition et al.
 Stipulations
 Safety review-Atomic Energy Commission Box 2 Application of the Potomac Electric Power Company, docket nos. 50-448 / 50-449 before
                                    the Atomic Energy Commission Pleadings, 1973-1974 Box 3 Application of the Potomac Electric Power Company docket nos. 50-448 / 50-449 before
                                    the Atomic Energy Commission Safety review-Atomic Energy Commission Pleadings—January 1974-November 1974 Application of the Potomac Electric Power Company for a certificate of convenience
                                    & necessitydocket no. 6603 before the Maryland Public Service Commission
 Application of the Potomac Electric Power Company, 1972Preliminary environmental review-Maryland Dept of Natural Resources, 1973
 Box 4 Application of the Potomac Electric Power Company for a certificate of convenience
                                    & necessitydocket no. 6603 before the Maryland Public Service Commission
 Pleadings—January-November 1974 Background:Potomac Electric Power Company—brochures, n.d.
 Johns Hopkins University-Power Plant Site Evaluation Interim Report-Douglas Point
                                 Site, 1974
 Box 5 Background:Johns Hopkins University-Power Plant Site Evaluation Interim Report-Douglas Point
                                 Site, 1974
 Electric Utility Rates—Michigan (1974-1975); 1 box Box 1 Nos. U-4570, U-4576, U-4807 before the Michigan Public Service Commission Correspondence-Press, 1974-1975 Brief-Environmental Defense Fund, December 1974Notice of proposal for decision, December 1974
 Detroit Edison’s motion for interim partial and immediate revenue relief, April 1975Notice of hearing, May 1975
 Motions to intervene, May 1975
 Interrogatories to Detroit Edison, August 1975
 Electric Utilities—North Carolina (1975); 1 box Box 1 Investigation of peak-load pricing, metering, conservation, load management, no. E-100
                                 Sub 21 before the North Carolina Utilities Commission Pleadings, 1975Pleadings-Brief of the Attorney General, 1975
 Rate Design for Electric Corporations (1975-1976); 2 boxes
 Case no. 26806 before the NYS Public Service Commission
 Box 1 Pleadings, April 1975-March 1976 Pleadings-Briefs:Environmental Defense Fund
 ITT World Communications Inc. (Long Island Lighting rates no. 26887)
 Federal Energy Administration
 City of New York
 On behalf of intervenors
 Rochester Gas & Electric
 Consolidated Edison
 Box 2 Pleadings-Briefs:Industrial Powers Consumers Conference
 Pleadings-Reply briefs:Environmental Defense Fund
 AIRCO
 Federal Energy Administration
 Owners Committee on Electric Rates
 Rochester Gas & Electric
 Long Island Lighting Company
 Intervenors
 Prototype Oil Shale Leasing Program (1978-1980); 1 box Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund, Colorado Open Space Council, Friends of the Earthv. Cecil D. Andrus et al. (U.S. Ct of Appeals, 10th Cir.)
 Briefs:Reply brief—Appellants Environmental Defense Fund et al., 1979
 Brief—Appellants, 1979
 Joint appendix Electric Utilities—California (1981-1983); 1 box Box 1 Application no. 57284 before the California Public Utilities Commission Testimony—W.R.Z. Willey—Environmental Defense Fund, 1978 Application no. 59537 before the California Public Utilities Commission Decision no. 93891 Application no. 60153 before the California Public Utilities Commission Report on the quantitative measurement of Pacific Gas & Electric’s conservation programs-test
                                 year 1982 Application no. 61138 before the California Public Utilities Commission Report on energy conservation programs of Southern California Edison-test year 1983 California Public Utilities Commission. (1983). Standard practice for cost-benefit analysis of conservation & load management programs. Joint staff report.
 Financial & Cost Implications of Constructing Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (1981-1982);
                                    12 boxes Case no. 28059 before the NYS Public Service Commission Box 1 Media—Clippings Pleadings (correspondence), December 1981Pleadings—Briefs—Environmental Defense Fund
 Pleadings—Briefs—Capital District Anti-Nuclear Alliance
 Pleadings—Briefs—NYS Consumer Protection Board
 Interrogatories Box 2 Interrogatories Box 3 InterrogatoriesTestimony—summaries
 Box 4 Testimony:Central Hudson Gas & Electric
 Environmental Defense Fund
 NYS Consumer Protection Board
 NYS Department of Public Service
 Box 5 Testimony:NYS Gas & Electric
 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
 William H. Hieronymus in rebuttal to the Environmental Defense Fund
 Witnesses on behalf of co-tenants
 Minutes of pre-hearing conference, September 23, 1981 Box 6 Minutes of pre-hearing conference, September 24, 1981 Minutes of public hearing, December 1, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of Theodore Barry & Associates
 Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Minutes of public hearing, December 2, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Box 7 Minutes of public hearing, December 2, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Witnesses on behalf of the co-tenants
 Minutes of public hearing, December 3, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of the co-tenants
 Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Consumer Protection Board
 Minutes of public hearing, December 4, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation / Rochester Gas & Electric
 Box 8 Minutes of public hearing, December 4, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of Niagara Mohawk / Rochester Gas & Electric
 Witness on behalf of the NYS Consumer Protection Board
 Minutes of public hearing, December 7, 1981:Witness on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Witnesses on behalf of co-tenants
 Minutes of public hearing, December 8, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Witness on behalf of the NYS Consumer Protection Board
 Box 9 Minutes of public hearing, December 8, 1981:Witness on behalf of Assemblyman Maurice D. Hinchey
 Minutes of public hearing, December 10, 1981 Minutes of public hearing, December 11, 1981:Witnesses on behalf of co-tenants
 Witnesses on behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
 Box 10 Environmental Defense Fund. (1981). A new alternative to completing Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Nuclear Station: Economic and technical
 analysis. Berkeley: Author.
 Opening brief-Environmental Defense Fund, December 1981 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on incentive rate of return plan for ratemaking
                                 treatment of future construction cost of the Nine Mile 2 Nuclear Generating Plant.,
                                 March 1982 Petition for reconsideration submitted by the NYS Consumer Protection Board et al.,
                                 May 1982Reply of the co-tenants in response to petition for re-hearing, June 1982
 Box 11 Exhibits Analysis of record—Administrative Law Judge Documents—Reports—Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Box 12 Documents—Theodore Barry & Associates audit—CommentsMinutes—Verification meeting for the TB&A audit, Syracuse NY, May 1981
 New York State Energy Master Plan (1981-1983); 1 box Box 1 The 1981 State Energy Master Plan & long range electric & gas system planning proceedingsbefore the State Energy Office
 Rebuttal testimony of George L. Fitzpatrick on behalf of the New York Power PoolPrepared testimony of David Nichols, Paul D. Raskin, Energy Systems Research Group
 Reports: New York State Energy Office. (1982). New York State energy master plan & long range electricand gas report, volume one. Final report. Albany: Author.
 New York State Energy Office. (1983). New York State energy master plan & long range electricand gas report, volume three: draft environmental impact statement. Albany: Author.
 Implementation of Conservation Programs that will Reduce Electric Use (1981-1983);
                                    14 boxes
 See also: Record Group 2, New York Office, Sub-group V
 Case no. 28223 before the NYS Public Service Commission Box 1
 Correspondence—Pilot programs
 Memoranda, 1982-1983
 Memoranda, undated
 Memoranda—Legal issues
 Minutes—Pre-hearing conference, May-June 1982Minutes—Pre-hearing conference, September 1982
 Box 2 Interrogatories Box 3 InterrogatoriesPleadings, December 1982
 Pleadings—Briefs—Rochester Gas & Electric
 Pleadings—Briefs—Utilities
 Pleadings—Briefs—Environmental Defense Fund
 Box 4 Recommended decision, 1983 Pleadings:Briefs—Utilities
 Briefs—Public Service Commission
 Briefs—Central Hudson Electric & Gas
 Briefs—Consolidated Edison
 Briefs—Natural Resources Defense Council / Environmental Planning Lobby
 Briefs—Niagara Mohawk
 Briefs—Rochester Gas & Electric
 Pleadings—Data requests—Environmental Defense Fund Testimony:Witnesses on behalf of the Applied Energy Group
 Witnesses on behalf of Consolidated Edison
 Box 5 Testimony:Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Witnesses on behalf of the Long Island Lighting Company
 Witnesses on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council / Environmental Planning
                                 Lobby
 Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Witnesses on behalf of New York State Electric & Gas
 Witnesses on behalf of the New York State Energy Office
 Box 6 Testimony:Witnesses on behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
 Witnesses on behalf of Orange & Rockland Utilities
 Minutes of Public Hearing, December 6, 1982:Witnesses on behalf of NYS Electric & Gas
 Witnesses on behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
 Witnesses on behalf of Rochester Gas & Electric
 Witnesses on behalf of utility companies
 Minutes of Public Hearing, December 7, 1982:Witness on behalf of utility companies
 
 Box 7
 Minutes of public hearing, December 7, 1982:Witnesses on behalf of utility companies
 Witness on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Minutes of public hearing, December 8, 1982:Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Witness on behalf of Energy Systems Research Group
 Minutes of public hearing, July 12, 1983:Witnesses on behalf of NYS Electric & Gas (NYSEG)
 Witnesses on behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
 Box 8 Minutes of public hearing, July 12, 1983:Witnesses on behalf of the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO)
 Minutes of public hearing, July 13, 1983:Witnesses on behalf of Consolidated Edison
 Witnesses on behalf of Applied Energy Group
 Witnesses on behalf of Orange & Rockland Utilities
 Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Minutes of public hearing, July 14, 1983:Witnesses on behalf of Rochester Gas & Electric
 Witnesses on behalf of Energy Systems Research Group
 Witness on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Minutes of public hearing, July 15, 1983:Witness on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Box 9 Minutes of public hearing, July 15, 1983:Witness on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Minutes of public hearing, July 18, 1983:Witnesses on behalf of Central Hudson Electric & Gas
 Witness on behalf of the NYC Energy Office
 Witness on behalf of the NYS Consumer Protection Board
 Minutes of public hearing, July 19, 1983:Witness on behalf of the NYS Department of Public Service
 Witnesses on behalf of the NYS Energy Office
 Exhibits Box 10 Exhibits Box 11 Comments on shared savings proposal of the PSC staff—Environmental Defense FundNotes of counsel on testimony
 Box 12 Correspondence, 1982-1986 Report-Conservation potential-NYSEG, ca. 1981Statement-Conservation measures, September 1982
 Interrogatories-Answers of Consolidated Edison to EDF, September 1982
 Symposium on utility investment in conservation-Announcement, October 1982
 Interrogatories-Answers of Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), October 1982
 Interrogatories-Answers of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, October 1982
 Interrogatories-Answers of NYSEG
 Exhibit-EDF-Methodology for assessing cost-effectiveness of end-use conservation programs
 Notes-Rebuttal testimony preparation
 Report-Residential appliance inventory, survey instruments, December 1982
 Brief-NYSEG
 Box 13 Briefs-utilities, February 1983Shared savings proposal-Staff-Comments, March 1983
 Report-Evaluation of the energy conservation potential in the large commercial sector-
 Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), March 1983
 Interrogatories-Answers of Central Hudson Gas & Electric
 Interrogatories-Answers of Orange & Rockland Utilities
 Box 14 Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on Conservation Voltage Regulation reports
                                 submitted by utilities, March 1983 Interrogatories-Answers of the Environmental Defense FundStaff & non-utility intervenors’ agreement
 Conservation Program plans—Comments, 1985
 Conservation Program plan for 1986-Consolidated Edison, 1985
 Conservation Program plan for 1987-Consolidated Edison, 1986
 Niagara Mohawk Corporation-Long Run Avoided Costs (1985-1987); 1 box Box 1 Order & pleadings, 1985Opinion & order of the NYS Public Service Commission no. 86-8
 Petition by the Occidental Chemical Corporation for rehearing of opinion
 PSC-Long-run avoided costs: updated estimates of fuel prices, inflation & electric
                                 load growth\
 Order adopting long run avoided cost updates
 Nine Mile Point 2-Prudence of costs incurred (1986); 1 box Box 1 Rebuttal testimony-Niagara Mohawk CorporationPleadings
 Testimony-NYS Consumer Protection Board
 Petition for rehearing
 SERIES 2: Background Documents Trans-Alaska Pipeline System—Canadian Alternative Route; 12 boxes Box 1 Memoranda—Re: Canadian alternative routeMedia—Canadian
 Box 2 Environmental studies—Government:Canada-Department of Energy, Mines and Resources
 Canada-Department of the Environment
 Box 3 Environmental studies—Government:Canada-Department of External Affairs
 Geological Survey of Canada
 Canada-Department of Indian Affairs & Northern Development
 Box 4 Environmental studies—Government:Canada-Department of Indian Affairs & Northern Development
 National Research Council of Canada
 Box 5 Environmental studies:Canadian Arctic Gas Study Ltd.
 Canadian Gas Association
 Canadian Arctic Resources Committee
 Canadian Environment Protection Board
 Box 6 Environmental studies:Canadian Environment Protection Board
 Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Research Ltd.
 Northwest Project Study Group
 Trans-Canada Pipelines
 University sources
 Box 7 Environmental studies: University sources
 Reports:Atlantic Pipeline Company—Transport
 Bechtel Corporation-Transport
 Canadian Arctic Resources Committee
 Canadian Arctic Gas Survey
 Canada-Department of the Environment
 Charles Cicchetti—Benefit cost analysis
 Box 8 Reports:Department of the Interior—Economic & security aspects
 Canadian Government Documents:House of Commons Debates—Vol. 115, nos. 95, 214, 237, Official reports
 House of Commons Debates—Vol. 117, nos. 137, 140, 154-56, Official reports
 House of Commons—Minutes of proceedings of Special Committee on Environmental Pollution
 Subject Files:Energy Policy—Canada
 Box 9 Subject Files:Energy Policy—Canada
 Mackenzie Valley Corridor
 Native claims
 Pipeline maps
 Box 10 Official correspondence and other communications between Canada & the U.S.Closed or Retained Document, Closed Description
 Alyeska / Oil Industry input on Canadian alternative
 Box 11 Alyeska / Oil Industry input on Canadian alternative Box 12 Feasibility of a Canadian alternative—Source unknown Trans-Alaska Pipeline System—Legislation (1973); 4 boxesSee also: Record Group 2: New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence, February 1973Correspondence—Congress, April-July 1973
 Senate bills:Senate bill 1081—Research
 Senate bill 1081—Foreign Relations Committee—Canadian alternative
 House bills:House bill 9130
 Box 2 Natural Gas Regulations and the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System—Hearings before the Joint
                                 Economic Committee June 1972 Rights-of-Way Across Federal Lands—Hearings before the Senate Insular & Interior Affairs
                                 Committee, 1973 Testimony / statements before the Senate Insular & Interior Affairs Committee:Alaskan
 Congressmen
 U.S. industry
 Box 3 Testimony / statements before the Senate Insular & Interior Affairs Committee:U.S. Industry
 Environmental groups
 Hearing notices—House committees Hearings before the Subcommittee on Public Lands, House Interior & Insular Affairs
                                 Committee, Volume 1: Government; Volume 2: Plaintiffs & Industry
 Statements to Congressional Committees—Administration Box 4 Statements to Congressional committees—AdministrationStatements before House committees—Congressmen
 Statements before House committees—Environmental groups
 Statements—Canadian industries
 Implementation of Conservation Programs that Will Reduce Electric Use (1981-1986);4 boxes
 Box 1 By Subject: 1983 Residential appliance inventory: Methodology & results—For NYS utilitiesAppliance saturation survey-For Central Hudson Gas & Electric, 1981
 Citizens Committee for a Long Island Power Authority-Report, 1985
 Coal conversion-Impact on utilities-Dept of Energy, 1980
 Conservation activities sponsored by utilities-Bibliography-Rochester Gas & Electric,
                                 1982
 Conservation activities-Niagara Mohawk Research Advisory Council, 1986
 Conservation-Articles
 Conservation Assessment Program Plan-New York State Energy & Gas, 1986
 Box 2 Conservation Assessment Program-Niagara Mohawk PowerConservation Assessment Project-1980 residential energy use survey-NYSEG Market Research
 Conservation Assessment Project-1981 commercial customer analysis-NYSEG Market Research
 Conservation plan for 1987-Orange & Rockland Utilities
 Conservation plan-PSE&G-New Jersey, 1982
 Conservation & Renewable Energy
 Conservation voltage regulation-Pacific Gas & Electric
 Conservation voltage regulation-Reports-Utilities, 1982-1983
 Box 3 Edison Electric Institute-PapersElectricity Conservation Assessment Programs-Utilities
 Electricity Conservation Investment Programs-Utilities
 Electricity Supply Sufficiency-Department of Energy
 Energy conservation activities, 1981-Pacific Gas & Electric
 Box 4 Energy conservation activities, 1981-San Diego Gas & ElectricEnergy technology alternatives-New York State-for NYS R&D Authority, 1982
 Financial incentives-Niagara Mohawk, 1986
 Home Energy Assistance Program-NYS Dept of Social Services, 1983-1984
 Home Insulation & Conservation Program-Evaluation-Niagara Mohawk, 1982
 Load Management Testing Model-for Niagara Mohawk, 1986
 Sherburne Co. Generating Station-Findings of fact, 1982
 Utility oil & gas consumption reduction-Department of Energy, 1980
 Weatherization Program-Idaho Power Company, 1981
 Sub-group V.4 Energy Program—Public Statements / Texts SERIES 1: Comments Box 1 Butler, W.A. (1970). [Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed amendments to the regulations of the Atomic Energy Commission]. Letter
 to the Secretary of the Commission.
 Roisman, A.Z. (1973). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed revisionto the Atomic Energy Commission regulations implementing the National
                                    Environmental
 Policy Act.
 Greenberg, E.V.C., Bartelman, C. (1975). Comments on behalf of the Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, the National Parks and
                                    Conservation
 Association and Friends of the Earth on the Energy Research and Development
 Administration’s draft impact statement, “Expansion of U.S. Uranium Enrichment
                                    Capacity”.
 Trujllo, G., Mastbaum, D.C. (1977). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the application of Gulf Oil Corporation and Standard Oil Company for a subsurface
                                    disposal
 system in Rio Blanco County, Colorado.
 Willey, W.R.Z., Mastbaum, D. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the assessment of the consequences of oil shale development (August 1979 draft),
 prepared by Batelle Northwest Laboratories for the U.S. Department of
                                    Energy.
 Percival, R.V. (1981). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the “Managementand Technical Review of the Construction and Feasibility of Nine Mile
                                    Point #2”
 prepared by Theodore Barry & Associates and Canatom, Inc.
 Percival, R.V. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on incentive rate of return Plan for ratemaking treatment of future construction costs of the Nine
                                    Mile 2 Nuclear
 Generating Plant. From proceedings before the NYS Public Service Commission,
 case no. 28059.
 SERIES 2: Testimony / Speeches Habicht, E.R. (1974, September).  [Speech on utility ratemaking reform]. Presented
                                 before the Federal Energy Administration’s Electric Utility Rate Conference.
 Habicht, E.R. (1975, April). Towards resolution of the conflict between energy and the environment.Presented at the Conference of the Measurement of Social and Economic
                                 Data and Public
 Policy, Austin, TX.
 May 7, 1975: Testimony of Ernst R. Habicht, Staff Scientist and Director of Energy
                                 Program of the Environmental Defense Fund, regarding the design of electricity tariffs
                                 before the Senate Public Works Committee. Habicht, E.R. (1975, June). The energy puzzle: Electric rates, space conditioning and loadmanagement.  Presented before the Federal Energy Administration Conference,
 “The Challenge of Load Management, a Convergence of Diverse Interests”,
 Washington, D.C.
 February 24, 1976: Testimony of Ernst R. Habicht, Director of the Energy Program,
                                 regarding Electric utilities, before the House Subcommittee on Energy Research, Development
                                 and Demonstration.
 April 2, 1976: Testimony of Ernst R. Habicht, Staff Scientist and Director of the
                                 Energy Program, regarding electric utility rate design reform, before the House Interstate
                                 and Foreign CommerceCommittee, Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
 April 13, 1976: Testimony of Katherine Fletcher, Staff Scientist, on guaranteed loans
                                 for synthetic fuels, before the House Committee on Science and Technology. May 3, 1977: Testimony of John Krautkraemer on behalf of the Environmental Defense
                                 Fund on the “Modifications to the Detailed Development Plan” of oil shale lease c-b
                                 (Ashland Oil, Inc. and Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.), Denver, Colorado. July 26, 1977: Testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Rio Blanco Oil Shale
                                 ProjectRevised Detailed Development Plan.
 June 14, 1979: Testimony of David B. Roe on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
                                 on National Solar Policy: Impact of Utility Financing on Solar Development, before the
                                 House
 Subcommittee on Energy and Power of the Commerce Committee and the Subcommittee on
 Energy Development and Applications of the Science and Technology Committee.
 February 27, 1980: Statement of Robert J. Rauch, Staff Attorney of the Environmental
                                 Defense Fund, on behalf of the National Clean Air Coalition, before the House Subcommittee
                                 on Oversight and Investigation of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. September 9, 1980: Testimony of Paula C. Phillips, Regional Counsel, on S. 2858 (oil
                                 shale leasing)before the Subcommittee on Energy Resources and Materials Production of the Senate
                                 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
 Willey,W.R.Z. (1981, February). Review of Hahn and Noll’s “Implementing tradable emissionspermits”. Prepared for the Conference on Reforming Government Regulation: Alternative
 Strategies to Social Regulatory Policy
 SERIES 3: Writings by Program Staff
 Habicht, E.R. (1976). Improving the efficiency of capital investment in the energy sector of our economy. Draft working paper.
 Habicht, E.R. (ca. 1976). The social origins and economic basis of the demand for electricity.Manuscript.
 Habicht, E.R. (1979). Property rights and energy prices. Manuscript. Wagoner, J.K. (1979). Uranium: The United States experience-A Lesson in History.Manuscript.
 Kirshner, D. (1980). Economic alternatives to new nuclear and coal plants in Michigan.Final report to the Special Joint Committee on Nuclear Energy, Michigan
                                 State
 Legislature.
 Oppenheimer, M. (1982). [Summary of article: “The relationship between sulfur emissions
                                 and sulfate in precipitation]. Memorandum.
 Roe, D.B. (1982). [Op-Ed piece on Nine Mile Point Unit 2].  Manuscript submitted to
                                 The New YorkTimes.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1983). Summary of National Clean Air Coalition positions on acid rain strategies for east and west. Memorandum.
 Oppenheimer, M. (1983). The relationship of sulfur emissions to sulfate in precipitation.
                                 Atmospheric Environment17(3) 451-460.
 Environmental Defense Fund. (1984). The positive alternative to completing Shoreham and NineMile 2: Supplement to economic and technical analysis, November 1981.  Report
 submitted to the Hon. Mario M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York.
  Sub-group VI: Transportation Program Sub-group VI.1: Transportation Program—Staff Files [Reserved] Sub-group VI.2: Transportation Program—Legal Files SERIES 1: Litigation & Hearings  Supersonic Transport—Concorde (1970-1977); 9 boxesSee also: Record Group 2: New York Office, Sub-group V
 Box 1 Correspondence:1968-1969
 1970
 1972
 1973
 1974
 1975
 Box 2 Correspondence:1975
 1976
 Memoranda, 1974-1975 Box 3 Memoranda, 1975-1976 Media:Concorde factsheet—EDF, n.d.
 Press releases—EDF, 1972
 Press releases—EDF, 1973-1974
 Petition under the Federal Aviation Act requesting the immediate promulgation of the
                                    environmental standards that will govern certification of the supersonic transport;
                                    Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund, 1970 Petition requesting the immediate promulgation of a rule barring the use of airport
                                    facilities to any new aircraft…that are unable to meet the noise standards applicable
                                    to newly certified subsonic aircraft. Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund to
                                    the State of Alaska et al., 1970 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Butterfield et al. No. 74-217 (U.S. Dist Ct.,
                                    D.C.) ComplaintsPleadings, 1974-1977
 Box 4 Documents—Environmental Protection AgencyDocuments—Department of Transportation—Federal Aviation Administration
 Hearings on the draft environmental impact statement on the Concorde Supersonic Transport
                                    before the Federal Aviation Administration
 Statement on behalf of Fairfax County, Virginia, April 1975Statement on behalf of the Anti-Concorde Project (London), April 1975
 Statement on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, April 1975
 Statement of Andrew Wilson, aviation journalist, April 1975
 Hearings on noise standards for SSTs before the Federal Aviation Administration Testimony of John Hellegers on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, May 1975 Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund for amendment of foreign air carrier permits
                                    held by British Airways Board and Compagnie Nationale Air France to forbid use of
                                    Concorde SST, Docket no. 28347 before the Civil Aeronautics Board Pleadings, October 1975 Box 5 Pleadings, November 1975` Hearings before the Subcommittee on Governmental Activities & Transportation
 Statement of Harold S. Johnston-University of California at Berkeley
 Statement of John Hellegers on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
 Statement of Robert H. Cannon, Jr.-University of Michigan
 Statement of Thomas M. Donahue
 Hearings on Concorde flight permits before the Department of TransportationStatement of Air France & British Airways
 Statement of the Concorde Team
 Statements of opponents to the Concorde (British)
 Statement on behalf of Alameda Co. et al., Calfornia
 Statement of Environmental Defense Fund
 Statement of National Parks & Conservation Association
 Statement of the Attorney General of New York
 Statement of Fairfax County, Virginia
 Statement of Federal officials
 Hearings on the Concorde SST before the Department of Transportation Submissions of the Environmental Defense Fund, 1975-1976 Box 6 Transcript of hearings, January 6, 1976 Environmental Defense Fund v. Department of Transportation & Wm. Coleman, Jr. No. 76-1105 (U.S. Ct. of Appeals)
 Pleadings, February-March 1976 Pleadings—Briefs:State of New York, March 1976
 Intervenor-Aviation Consumer Action Project, March 1976
 Environmental Defense Fund, March 1976
 Reply brief-Environmental Defense Fund, April 1976
 Brief-intervenor Pacific Legal Foundation, April 1976
 Reply brief—State of New York
 Box 7 Pleadings, April 1976Appendix
 Box 8 Appendix Petition of the Environmental Defense Fund for Concorde permit amendments to forbid false & deceptive advertising as to effect on jet lag Docket no. 29242 before
                                    the
 Civil Aeronautics Board
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 76-1062 (U.S. District Ct.,
                                    D.C.) Pleadings, 1976-1977 British Airways Board v. Port Authority of New York et al. No. 77-7237(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 2nd Cir.)
 Joint appendix Box 9 Pleadings—Reply brief—Amici Curiae Friends of the Earth et al.Pleadings—Reply brief—State of New York
 Documents—Environmental Protection Agency—Noise levels for airplanesDocuments—National Transportation Safety Board
 Documents—Federal Aviation Administration—Final Environmental Impact Statement for
                                 the Concorde SST, volume II, September 1975
 Documents—Federal Aviation Administration—Noise Abatement Policy,1976
 Documents—Federal Aviation Administration—Final Environmental Impact Statement-Noise
                                 regulation & type certification of civil supersonic aircraft, volume II, June 1978
 Air Quality—Washington D.C. (1971-1973); 5 boxes Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Washington et al. No. 6707(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)
 Correspondence, 1971-1973Pleadings, 1972
 Health studies
 Box 2 Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Washington et al. No. 6707(U.S. Ct. of Appeals, D.C. Cir.)
 Pleadings-Brief for petitioners, August 1972 Petition for review of the refusal of the Commissioner of the District of Columbia
                                 and the Director of the Dept of Environmental Services to take immediate action to
                                 alleviate a chronic air pollution emergency resulting form excessive concentrations
                                 of carbon monoxide in the ambient air… Pleadings-Brief for respondents, January 1973Appendices
 Box 3 Correspondence-EDF, 1971-1972Correspondence-Agencies (copies), 1971-1972
 Media-Press release-EDF, 1972Media-Clippings
 Comments-EDF-Proposed implementation plan for the control of carbon monoxide, nitrogen
                                 dioxide, hydrocarbons & oxidants for the District of Columbia portion of the National
                                 Capital Interstate Air Quality Control Region, 1972 Reports-Natural Resources Defense Council-Action for Clean Air, ca. 1971Reports-U.S. Dept of H.E.W.-Public Health Service-Carbon Monoxide
 Report-EPA-Vehicle Emissions Control
 Report-Washington D.C. Council of Governments?-Air Quality Planning
 Report-D.C.-Dept of Environmental Services-Annual Report on Quality of Air, 1973
 Box 4 Report-D.C.-Department of Environmental Services- Proposed implementation plan for
                                 the control of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, hydrocarbons & oxidants for the
                                 District of Columbia portion of the National Capital Interstate Air Quality Control
                                 Region Box 5 Reports-D.C. Department of Human ResourcesReports-Scientific journals
 Federal Register-EPA-ambient air quality standards Data-EPA-Air monitoring Highways (1972-1973); 2 boxes Box 1 Correspondence-1971-1975Correspondence-Miscellaneous highway cases, 1973-1974
 Speeches-John Hellegers Media—ClippingsMedia—Newsletter-TheConcrete Opposition, April, November 1972; January, Sept. 1974
 Media—Articles
 EDF et al. v. Volpe Civil no. 151-72 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.) Complaint Miscellaneous cases Box 2 Miscellaneous cases By Subject:Air quality guidelines-DEIS-Federal Highway Administration, 1973
 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety-Status reports
 Federal-Aid Highway Act
 National Cooperative Highway Research Program—Progress through 1972
 Occupant crash protection-DEIS-Federal Highway Administration
 Freight Rate Increases—Petitions before the Interstate Commerce Commission / Environmental
                                    Impact of surcharges on recyclable goods (1972-1974); 14 boxes Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (S.C.R.A.P.) et al. v. Interstate
                                    Commerce Commission No. 971-72 (U.S. District Ct., D.C.) Box 1 Correspondence, September 1971-October 1972Correspondence, January 1973-November 1974
 Correspondence, January-July 1975
 Memoranda—Research, 1974 Media—Clippings Pleadings:Re: Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, April 1972
 Plaintiffs’ motion for three-judge court, May 1972
 Box 2 Pleadings:Re: Motion to dismiss, May 1972
 Complaint to enjoin orders of the I.C.C. re: freight rates, May 1972
 Complaint for injunctive & declaratory relief, May 1972
 Re: Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, June-August 1972
 Notice of the United States’ appeal to the Supreme Court of the injunction order,
                                 July 1972
 Re: Motion to file amended complaint, November 1972
 Affidavits of Railroads, December 1972
 Memorandum of intervening railroads regarding relief sought by S.C.R.A.P. & EDF, December
                                 1972
 Box 3 Pleadings:Re: Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, December 1972
 Motions to intervene, February 1973
 Re: motion for restraining order, May 1973
 Re: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, July 1973
 Notice of appeal to the Supreme Court re: June 7 order enjoining freight rate increases
 Re: Intervenor-Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, June-August 1973
 Box 4 Pleadings:Re: Motion for summary judgment, appendices
 Affidavits of intervening railroads, October 1973
 Judgment, February 1974
 Notice of appeal of the I.C.C. to the Supreme Court, April-June 1974
 Pleadings, October-November 1973, 1974
 Box 5 Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co.’s application for stay of the preliminary injunction,
                                 A-72 (U.S. Supreme Court), July 1972
 U.S., Interstate Commerce Commission et al. v. S.C.R.A.P. et al. Nos. 72-535 / 72-562
                                    (U.S. Supreme Court)  Pleadings:Appendix, October 1972
 Jurisdictional statements, October 1972
 Re: Appellees’ motion to remand or affirm preliminary injunction, November-December
                                 1972
 Box 6 Pleadings:Motions to remand or affirm, November-December 1972
 Brief—Environmental Defense Fund, February 1973
 Brief—Amicus Curiae National Association of Secondary Material Industries
 Reply brief—Interstate Commerce Commission
 Opinion, June 1973 Applications nos. 1234 / 1239 (U.S. Supreme Court) Application of the Environmental Defense Fund to vacate stayApplications of the Railroad / Interstate Commerce Commission for stay of preliminary
                                 injunction pending appeal
 United States / Interstate Commerce Commission et al. v. Students Challenging Regulatory
                                    Agency Procedures et al. Nos. 73-399 / 73-420 (U.S. Supreme Court) Pleadings:Appellants’ motion to dismiss interlocutory appeals as moot, October 1973
 Re: Appellees’ motion to dismiss, October 1973
 Case remanded to district court, November 1973
 United States / Interstate Commerce Commission et al. v. Students Challenging Regulatory
                                    Agency Procedures et al. Nos. 73-1966 / 73-1971 (U.S. Supreme Court) Pleadings:Appendix, July 1974
 Box 7 Pleadings:Appellees’ motion to dismiss, August 1974
 Brief—Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company, December 1974
 Brief—Institute of Scrap Iron & Steel, February 1975
 Brief—National Association of Recycling Industries et al.
 Brief—S.C.R.A.P., Environmental Defense Fund
 Reply brief—Interstate Commerce Commission, March 1975
 Re: Mootness, April 1975
 Ex parte 55—Implementation of the National Environmental Protection Act; Proceedings
                                    before the Interstate Commerce Commission Notice of proposed rulemaking & orderOpinion
 Petition for re-consideration, September 1971
 Ex parte 265 & 267—Increased freight rates, 1970-1971; Proceedings before the Interstate
                                    Commerce Commission Petitions for intervention & reply of railroads, January 1972 Ex parte 270—Investigation of Railroad Freight Rate Structure; Proceedings before
                                    the Interstate Commerce Commission Preliminary report, November 1971 Ex parte 281—Increased freight rates, 1972; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce
                                    Commission Statements in support of increases—Railroads Box 8 Ex parte 281—Increased freight rates, 1972; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce
                                    Commission Statements in support of increases, January 1972Amendments to petition, March 1972
 Supplemental memorandum of railroad respondents, April 1972
 Reply verified statements—Railroads
 Order, October 1972
 Petition for re-consideration—Railroads, November 1972
 Box 9 Ex parte 281—Increased freight rates, 1972; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce
                                    Commission Document file with indexDraft environmental impact statement
 Final environmental impact statement—comments
 Box 10 Ex parte 288—Protective Service Charges; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce
                                    Commission Petition for increase in rates & charges, August 1972Statements in support of increase
 Ex parte 292—Emergency tariff; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission Petition to file an emergency surcharge of 2% on railroad freight rates & charges,
                                 January 1973 Statements by railroadsStatement by W.F. Betts, Association of American Railroads
 Box 11 Ex parte 292—Emergency tariff; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission Statement by W.F. Betts, Association of American Railroads Ex parte 295—Increase freight rates; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission Petition and amendments for a general increase in freight rates & charges, Statement of W.F. Betts, Association of American Railroads
 Box 12 Ex parte 295—Increase freight rates on recyclable materials; Proceedings before the
                                    Interstate Commerce Commission Statements—Railroads, April 1973 Box 13 Ex parte 295—Increase freight rates; Proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission Decision, October 1974 Ex parte 303—Increase in freight rates & charge; Proceedings before the Interstate
                                    Commerce Commission Statements—Railroads, January 1974Supplemental statement of W.F. Betts, Association of American Railroads
 Box 14 Background documents: Statements—National Association of Secondary Material IndustriesRelated cases
 Gateways Elimination (1973-1975); 1 box Box 1 Petition for the elimination of gateways by rulemaking, ex parte no. 55 (sub-no. 8)before the Interstate Commerce Commission
 Correspondence, 1973-1974
 Petition for initiation of a rulemaking procedure, March 1973
 Comments—Environmental Defense Fund in support of relief, August 1973
 Notice of proposed rulemaking and order, November 1973
 Comments on proposed rule and order:On behalf of consumer and environmental groups
 Consumers Union of the United States
 Midwest Packers Traffic Association
 U.S. Dept of Justice
 U.S. Dept of Transportation
 Order, February 1974Petition for oral hearing and/or modification of order, March 1974
 Petition for reconsideration of order, March 1974
 Petition for reconsideration-Common Carrier Conference-Irregular Route, 1975
 National Airport System Plan (1974-1977); 1 box Box 1 Environmental Defense Fund v. Brinegar, civil no. 74-340Environmental Defense Fund v. Coleman civil no. 74-340
 Environmental Defense Fund v. Adams civil no. 74-340
 Complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief, February-May 1974Pleadings-Document production, June-September 1974
 Pleadings-Re: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, 1975-1976
 Pleadings-Discovery, November-December 1976
 Pleadings, 1977
 Exhibits-Source unknown Automobile Fuel Economy Standards (1977); 1 box Box 1 Correspondence, 1977 Center for Auto Safety—Comments on treatment of information submitted for proceedingsDept. of Transportation—Treatment of confidential information, request for comment
 Environmental Defense Fund—Petition for compensation of certain participants in DOT
                                 proceedings
 Environmental Defense Fund—Application for funding
 Environmental Defense Fund—Post hearing comments on proposed fuel economy standards
                                 for 1981-1984 models
 SERIES 2: Background Documents Supersonic Transport—Concorde (1975-1977); 4 boxes Box 1 Correspondence, 1975-1976Memoranda—Department of Transportation, 1975
 Media—Clippings—British PressMedia—Department of Transportation News, 1976
 Media—Articles, 1968, 1970, 1972-1974
 TVASNAC Quotes [Newsletter], Vol. 8, 1976 Reports—British Aircraft Corporation Box 2 Reports—British Aircraft CorporationReports—Environmental Protection Agency
 Reports—Environmental groups
 Reports—Department of Transportation—Federal Aviation Administration
 Box 3 Reports—Department of Transportation—Federal Aviation AdministrationReports—State of Hawaii—Task Force on SST in Hawaii
 Reports—Bo Lundberg
 Environmental Impact Statement—DOT—DEIS on Concorde SST Transport, 1975Environmental Impact—Australia—Concorde Operations
 Box 4 Subject Files—Noise monitoringSubject Files—Ozone & supersonic transport
 Subject Files—Supersonic transport in Australia
 Sub-group VI.4: Transportation Program—Public Statements / Texts Habicht, E.R., Dienelt, J.F. (1971). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the proposed implementation plan for the control of carbon monoxide, nitrogen
 dioxide, hydrocarbons and oxidants for the District of Columbia portion
                                    of the
 National Capital Interstate Air Quality Control Program.
 Hellegers, J.F. (1975). [Op-Ed piece on SST].  Draft manuscript submitted to Newsday. |